Cargando…
Rapid literature review: definition and methodology
Introduction: A rapid literature review (RLR) is an alternative to systematic literature review (SLR) that can speed up the analysis of newly published data. The objective was to identify and summarize available information regarding different approaches to defining RLR and the methodology applied t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37533549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234 |
_version_ | 1785082926348632064 |
---|---|
author | Smela, Beata Toumi, Mondher Świerk, Karolina Francois, Clement Biernikiewicz, Małgorzata Clay, Emilie Boyer, Laurent |
author_facet | Smela, Beata Toumi, Mondher Świerk, Karolina Francois, Clement Biernikiewicz, Małgorzata Clay, Emilie Boyer, Laurent |
author_sort | Smela, Beata |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: A rapid literature review (RLR) is an alternative to systematic literature review (SLR) that can speed up the analysis of newly published data. The objective was to identify and summarize available information regarding different approaches to defining RLR and the methodology applied to the conduct of such reviews. Methods: The Medline and EMBASE databases, as well as the grey literature, were searched using the set of keywords and their combination related to the targeted and rapid review, as well as design, approach, and methodology. Of the 3,898 records retrieved, 12 articles were included. Results: Specific definition of RLRs has only been developed in 2021. In terms of methodology, the RLR should be completed within shorter timeframes using simplified procedures in comparison to SLRs, while maintaining a similar level of transparency and minimizing bias. Inherent components of the RLR process should be a clear research question, search protocol, simplified process of study selection, data extraction, and quality assurance. Conclusions: There is a lack of consensus on the formal definition of the RLR and the best approaches to perform it. The evidence-based supporting methods are evolving, and more work is needed to define the most robust approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10392303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103923032023-08-02 Rapid literature review: definition and methodology Smela, Beata Toumi, Mondher Świerk, Karolina Francois, Clement Biernikiewicz, Małgorzata Clay, Emilie Boyer, Laurent J Mark Access Health Policy Review Article Introduction: A rapid literature review (RLR) is an alternative to systematic literature review (SLR) that can speed up the analysis of newly published data. The objective was to identify and summarize available information regarding different approaches to defining RLR and the methodology applied to the conduct of such reviews. Methods: The Medline and EMBASE databases, as well as the grey literature, were searched using the set of keywords and their combination related to the targeted and rapid review, as well as design, approach, and methodology. Of the 3,898 records retrieved, 12 articles were included. Results: Specific definition of RLRs has only been developed in 2021. In terms of methodology, the RLR should be completed within shorter timeframes using simplified procedures in comparison to SLRs, while maintaining a similar level of transparency and minimizing bias. Inherent components of the RLR process should be a clear research question, search protocol, simplified process of study selection, data extraction, and quality assurance. Conclusions: There is a lack of consensus on the formal definition of the RLR and the best approaches to perform it. The evidence-based supporting methods are evolving, and more work is needed to define the most robust approaches. Routledge 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10392303/ /pubmed/37533549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Smela, Beata Toumi, Mondher Świerk, Karolina Francois, Clement Biernikiewicz, Małgorzata Clay, Emilie Boyer, Laurent Rapid literature review: definition and methodology |
title | Rapid literature review: definition and methodology |
title_full | Rapid literature review: definition and methodology |
title_fullStr | Rapid literature review: definition and methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid literature review: definition and methodology |
title_short | Rapid literature review: definition and methodology |
title_sort | rapid literature review: definition and methodology |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37533549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smelabeata rapidliteraturereviewdefinitionandmethodology AT toumimondher rapidliteraturereviewdefinitionandmethodology AT swierkkarolina rapidliteraturereviewdefinitionandmethodology AT francoisclement rapidliteraturereviewdefinitionandmethodology AT biernikiewiczmałgorzata rapidliteraturereviewdefinitionandmethodology AT clayemilie rapidliteraturereviewdefinitionandmethodology AT boyerlaurent rapidliteraturereviewdefinitionandmethodology |