Poster 344: Reduced Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Revision with Internal Brace Augmentation: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study with a minimum 2-year Follow-up

OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate retear rates in patients who underwent ACLR with and without internal bracing in a matched cohort study. Additionally, we also sought to investigate if there were any differences in clinical and patient-reported outcomes between the groups. We hypothesized that ACLR with internal bracing would reduce the incidence of revisions in a safe and effective manner. METHODS: A total of 200 patients were included in this study. Patients between the ages of 13-39 at the time of surgery who underwent primary autograft ACLR with internal bracing (IB group) between October 2010 and July 2020 and were enrolled in our institution’s registry with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were identified and matched 1:1 with a non-internal brace (no-IB) group based on patient demographics and concomitant procedures. Every patient completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS), Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR- 12), and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pre- and postoperatively. KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were included in the pre- and postoperative objective, clinical assessments. RESULTS: The IB group underwent significantly less revision ACLRs (1% vs. 8%, p = 0.017). Additionally, the average time elapsed from the original ACLR to the revision did not differ significantly and the average ages for the IB and the no-IB groups were comparable (19.0-years-old vs. 19.9-years-old). 5 patients in the no-IB group underwent a total of 9 meniscal procedures among them at the time of their revision ACLR compared to just one in the IB group (p = 0.009). There were also 4 patients in the no-IB group that underwent anterolateral ligament reconstruction at the time of their revisions (4 vs. 0, p = 0.043). All postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) significantly increased in both groups with the exception of the MARS score which significantly decreased in both groups postoperatively. KT-1000 measurements significantly improved in both groups following surgery with the IB and no-IB cohorts yielding comparable results at the manual maximum pull (0.97mm vs. 0.65mm). CONCLUSIONS: ACLR with internal bracing resulted in an 88% decrease in revision ACLRs while maintaining comparable patient reported outcomes. Incorporating an Internal brace into ACLR is therefore safe and effective within these study parameters.