Cargando…

Poster 209: Physical Examination vs Ultrasonography for Detection of Ulnar Nerve Subluxation in Professional Baseball Pitchers

OBJECTIVES: Despite the importance of accurately detecting the presence of ulnar nerve subluxation in vulnerable athletes, minimal research has compared the performance of physical examination and ultrasound in professional baseball pitchers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Day, Hannah, Reddy, Manoj, Paul, Ryan, Nazarian, Levon, Cohen, Steven, Looney, Austin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392352/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00194
_version_ 1785082938704003072
author Day, Hannah
Reddy, Manoj
Paul, Ryan
Nazarian, Levon
Cohen, Steven
Looney, Austin
author_facet Day, Hannah
Reddy, Manoj
Paul, Ryan
Nazarian, Levon
Cohen, Steven
Looney, Austin
author_sort Day, Hannah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Despite the importance of accurately detecting the presence of ulnar nerve subluxation in vulnerable athletes, minimal research has compared the performance of physical examination and ultrasound in professional baseball pitchers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize the diagnostic validity of physical examination in the detection of ulnar nerve subluxation at the cubital tunnel of the elbow compared with ultrasound. METHODS: Physical and sonographic examinations for ulnar nerve subluxation were performed on 186 elbows of 95 consecutive male professional baseball pitchers (ages 17 to 30 years) as a routine part of Spring Training assessments. Provocative maneuvers consisting of Tinel’s test and the elbow flexion compression test were evaluated over the cubital tunnel. The validity of physical examination for detecting ulnar nerve subluxation at the elbow was determined using ultrasound as the gold standard for comparison. RESULTS: Ulnar nerve subluxation was detected by physical examination in 58 (31.2%) elbows and by ultrasonography in 61 (32.8%) elbows. Of the 58 elbows with positive physical examination, 47 were positive on ultrasound. The accuracy of physical examination was 86.6%, with 77.0% sensitivity and 91.2% specificity. The positive and negative predictive value of physical examination were 81.0% and 89.1%, respectively. There was no relationship between nerve instability and positive provocative tests overall, in dominant vs nondominant arms, or in right vs left arms (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Physical examination has moderate sensitivity and high specificity for detecting ulnar nerve subluxation at the cubital tunnel of the elbow when compared with ultrasound. These findings suggest that when detecting the presence of a subluxating ulnar nerve is most important, it may be advisable to obtain an ultrasound evaluation instead of relying on physical examination; however, physical examination alone may be appropriate for ruling out subluxation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10392352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103923522023-08-02 Poster 209: Physical Examination vs Ultrasonography for Detection of Ulnar Nerve Subluxation in Professional Baseball Pitchers Day, Hannah Reddy, Manoj Paul, Ryan Nazarian, Levon Cohen, Steven Looney, Austin Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Despite the importance of accurately detecting the presence of ulnar nerve subluxation in vulnerable athletes, minimal research has compared the performance of physical examination and ultrasound in professional baseball pitchers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize the diagnostic validity of physical examination in the detection of ulnar nerve subluxation at the cubital tunnel of the elbow compared with ultrasound. METHODS: Physical and sonographic examinations for ulnar nerve subluxation were performed on 186 elbows of 95 consecutive male professional baseball pitchers (ages 17 to 30 years) as a routine part of Spring Training assessments. Provocative maneuvers consisting of Tinel’s test and the elbow flexion compression test were evaluated over the cubital tunnel. The validity of physical examination for detecting ulnar nerve subluxation at the elbow was determined using ultrasound as the gold standard for comparison. RESULTS: Ulnar nerve subluxation was detected by physical examination in 58 (31.2%) elbows and by ultrasonography in 61 (32.8%) elbows. Of the 58 elbows with positive physical examination, 47 were positive on ultrasound. The accuracy of physical examination was 86.6%, with 77.0% sensitivity and 91.2% specificity. The positive and negative predictive value of physical examination were 81.0% and 89.1%, respectively. There was no relationship between nerve instability and positive provocative tests overall, in dominant vs nondominant arms, or in right vs left arms (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Physical examination has moderate sensitivity and high specificity for detecting ulnar nerve subluxation at the cubital tunnel of the elbow when compared with ultrasound. These findings suggest that when detecting the presence of a subluxating ulnar nerve is most important, it may be advisable to obtain an ultrasound evaluation instead of relying on physical examination; however, physical examination alone may be appropriate for ruling out subluxation. SAGE Publications 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10392352/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00194 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Day, Hannah
Reddy, Manoj
Paul, Ryan
Nazarian, Levon
Cohen, Steven
Looney, Austin
Poster 209: Physical Examination vs Ultrasonography for Detection of Ulnar Nerve Subluxation in Professional Baseball Pitchers
title Poster 209: Physical Examination vs Ultrasonography for Detection of Ulnar Nerve Subluxation in Professional Baseball Pitchers
title_full Poster 209: Physical Examination vs Ultrasonography for Detection of Ulnar Nerve Subluxation in Professional Baseball Pitchers
title_fullStr Poster 209: Physical Examination vs Ultrasonography for Detection of Ulnar Nerve Subluxation in Professional Baseball Pitchers
title_full_unstemmed Poster 209: Physical Examination vs Ultrasonography for Detection of Ulnar Nerve Subluxation in Professional Baseball Pitchers
title_short Poster 209: Physical Examination vs Ultrasonography for Detection of Ulnar Nerve Subluxation in Professional Baseball Pitchers
title_sort poster 209: physical examination vs ultrasonography for detection of ulnar nerve subluxation in professional baseball pitchers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392352/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00194
work_keys_str_mv AT dayhannah poster209physicalexaminationvsultrasonographyfordetectionofulnarnervesubluxationinprofessionalbaseballpitchers
AT reddymanoj poster209physicalexaminationvsultrasonographyfordetectionofulnarnervesubluxationinprofessionalbaseballpitchers
AT paulryan poster209physicalexaminationvsultrasonographyfordetectionofulnarnervesubluxationinprofessionalbaseballpitchers
AT nazarianlevon poster209physicalexaminationvsultrasonographyfordetectionofulnarnervesubluxationinprofessionalbaseballpitchers
AT cohensteven poster209physicalexaminationvsultrasonographyfordetectionofulnarnervesubluxationinprofessionalbaseballpitchers
AT looneyaustin poster209physicalexaminationvsultrasonographyfordetectionofulnarnervesubluxationinprofessionalbaseballpitchers