Cargando…

Paper 26: Clinical Outcomes of Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft As The Gold Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes following “gold standard” ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BPTB) autograft versus ACLR combined with an anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) using hamstring tendon autografts (HT), in a large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pioger, Charles, Gousopoulos, Lampros, Hopper, Graeme, Vieira, Thais, Campos, Joao, Philippe, Corentin, Helou, Abdo, Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand, Saithna, Adnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392390/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00052
_version_ 1785082948546985984
author Pioger, Charles
Gousopoulos, Lampros
Hopper, Graeme
Vieira, Thais
Campos, Joao
Philippe, Corentin
Helou, Abdo
Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
Saithna, Adnan
author_facet Pioger, Charles
Gousopoulos, Lampros
Hopper, Graeme
Vieira, Thais
Campos, Joao
Philippe, Corentin
Helou, Abdo
Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
Saithna, Adnan
author_sort Pioger, Charles
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes following “gold standard” ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BPTB) autograft versus ACLR combined with an anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) using hamstring tendon autografts (HT), in a large series of propensity matched patients. The hypothesis was that combined ACLR+ALLR would confer better graft rupture rates and lower non-graft rupture related re-operation rates than isolated ACLR with BPTB METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Patients undergoing ACLR+ALLR using HT between January 2003 and December 2019 were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients undergoing isolated ACLR using BPTB. At the end of the study period rates of graft rupture and any other re-operations or complications that occurred following the index procedure were identified by database interrogation, review of medical records and standardized telephone interview. Kaplan Meier survivorship analyses and Cox-proportional hazards models were used to evaluate graft survivorship, re-operation free survivorship and the significance of potentially important risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 2018 patients (1009 matched pairs) were included. The mean duration of follow-up was 101.3 months. Kaplan Meier Analysis demonstrated a significantly better graft survivorship in the ACLR+ALLR group when compared to the BPTB group at every time point (Fig 1 and Table 1). The Cox model demonstrated that patients in the BPTB group were > 3-fold more likely to experience graft failure (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.554 [1.744;7.243], p = 0.0005). Patients aged less than 20 years were at particularly high risk of graft rupture (HR = 5.65 [1.834;17.241], p = 0.0002) and further analysis of this subgroup demonstrated that isolated ACLR with BPTB also conferred a > 3 fold increased risk of graft rupture in young patients when compared to ACLR+ALLR. Multivariate analysis did not identify any other significant risk factors for graft rupture. Overall, there was a significantly higher reoperation rate following isolated ACLR (BPTB group 20.5%, ACLR+ALLR group 8.9%, p < 0.0001). This finding was accounted for by significantly higher rates of graft rupture (9.9% vs 3.5%, p <0.0001), cyclops syndrome (3.3% vs 1.5%, p <0.0001), and secondary meniscectomy (5% vs 2.9%, p=0.0196) in the BPTB group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent isolated ACLR with BPTB autografts experienced significantly worse ACL graft survivorship and overall re-operation free survivorship when compared to those who underwent combined ACLR+ALLR with hamstring autografts. The risk of graft rupture was more than 3-fold higher in patients who underwent isolated ACLR using BPTB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10392390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103923902023-08-02 Paper 26: Clinical Outcomes of Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft As The Gold Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients Pioger, Charles Gousopoulos, Lampros Hopper, Graeme Vieira, Thais Campos, Joao Philippe, Corentin Helou, Abdo Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand Saithna, Adnan Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes following “gold standard” ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BPTB) autograft versus ACLR combined with an anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) using hamstring tendon autografts (HT), in a large series of propensity matched patients. The hypothesis was that combined ACLR+ALLR would confer better graft rupture rates and lower non-graft rupture related re-operation rates than isolated ACLR with BPTB METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Patients undergoing ACLR+ALLR using HT between January 2003 and December 2019 were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients undergoing isolated ACLR using BPTB. At the end of the study period rates of graft rupture and any other re-operations or complications that occurred following the index procedure were identified by database interrogation, review of medical records and standardized telephone interview. Kaplan Meier survivorship analyses and Cox-proportional hazards models were used to evaluate graft survivorship, re-operation free survivorship and the significance of potentially important risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 2018 patients (1009 matched pairs) were included. The mean duration of follow-up was 101.3 months. Kaplan Meier Analysis demonstrated a significantly better graft survivorship in the ACLR+ALLR group when compared to the BPTB group at every time point (Fig 1 and Table 1). The Cox model demonstrated that patients in the BPTB group were > 3-fold more likely to experience graft failure (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.554 [1.744;7.243], p = 0.0005). Patients aged less than 20 years were at particularly high risk of graft rupture (HR = 5.65 [1.834;17.241], p = 0.0002) and further analysis of this subgroup demonstrated that isolated ACLR with BPTB also conferred a > 3 fold increased risk of graft rupture in young patients when compared to ACLR+ALLR. Multivariate analysis did not identify any other significant risk factors for graft rupture. Overall, there was a significantly higher reoperation rate following isolated ACLR (BPTB group 20.5%, ACLR+ALLR group 8.9%, p < 0.0001). This finding was accounted for by significantly higher rates of graft rupture (9.9% vs 3.5%, p <0.0001), cyclops syndrome (3.3% vs 1.5%, p <0.0001), and secondary meniscectomy (5% vs 2.9%, p=0.0196) in the BPTB group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent isolated ACLR with BPTB autografts experienced significantly worse ACL graft survivorship and overall re-operation free survivorship when compared to those who underwent combined ACLR+ALLR with hamstring autografts. The risk of graft rupture was more than 3-fold higher in patients who underwent isolated ACLR using BPTB. SAGE Publications 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10392390/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00052 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Pioger, Charles
Gousopoulos, Lampros
Hopper, Graeme
Vieira, Thais
Campos, Joao
Philippe, Corentin
Helou, Abdo
Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
Saithna, Adnan
Paper 26: Clinical Outcomes of Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft As The Gold Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients
title Paper 26: Clinical Outcomes of Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft As The Gold Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients
title_full Paper 26: Clinical Outcomes of Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft As The Gold Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients
title_fullStr Paper 26: Clinical Outcomes of Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft As The Gold Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Paper 26: Clinical Outcomes of Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft As The Gold Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients
title_short Paper 26: Clinical Outcomes of Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft As The Gold Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients
title_sort paper 26: clinical outcomes of combined acl and anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus isolated acl reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft as the gold standard: a matched-pair analysis of 2018 patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392390/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00052
work_keys_str_mv AT piogercharles paper26clinicaloutcomesofcombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionversusisolatedaclreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneautograftasthegoldstandardamatchedpairanalysisof2018patients
AT gousopouloslampros paper26clinicaloutcomesofcombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionversusisolatedaclreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneautograftasthegoldstandardamatchedpairanalysisof2018patients
AT hoppergraeme paper26clinicaloutcomesofcombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionversusisolatedaclreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneautograftasthegoldstandardamatchedpairanalysisof2018patients
AT vieirathais paper26clinicaloutcomesofcombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionversusisolatedaclreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneautograftasthegoldstandardamatchedpairanalysisof2018patients
AT camposjoao paper26clinicaloutcomesofcombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionversusisolatedaclreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneautograftasthegoldstandardamatchedpairanalysisof2018patients
AT philippecorentin paper26clinicaloutcomesofcombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionversusisolatedaclreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneautograftasthegoldstandardamatchedpairanalysisof2018patients
AT helouabdo paper26clinicaloutcomesofcombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionversusisolatedaclreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneautograftasthegoldstandardamatchedpairanalysisof2018patients
AT sonnerycottetbertrand paper26clinicaloutcomesofcombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionversusisolatedaclreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneautograftasthegoldstandardamatchedpairanalysisof2018patients
AT saithnaadnan paper26clinicaloutcomesofcombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionversusisolatedaclreconstructionwithbonepatellartendonboneautograftasthegoldstandardamatchedpairanalysisof2018patients