Cargando…

Poster 145: A Biomechanical Comparison of All-Inside versus Trans-tibial Meniscal Root Repair Techniques

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of an all-inside meniscal root repair procedure versus transtibial repair METHODS: Nine paired cadaveric knees were prepared with pressure mapping sensors and underwent pressure testing to obtain peak pressures, average pressures, and femorot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasic, Nicholas, Dragoo, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392408/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00135
_version_ 1785082953517236224
author Pasic, Nicholas
Dragoo, Jason
author_facet Pasic, Nicholas
Dragoo, Jason
author_sort Pasic, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of an all-inside meniscal root repair procedure versus transtibial repair METHODS: Nine paired cadaveric knees were prepared with pressure mapping sensors and underwent pressure testing to obtain peak pressures, average pressures, and femorotibial contact area in both the medial and lateral compartments. Testing was performed in three states: meniscus intact, meniscal root cut, and following meniscal root repair with all-inside repair technique. Additionally, testing was completed on eight pairs of cadaveric knees to compare stiffness and maximal load to failure between all-inside and transtibial meniscal root repair techniques. RESULTS: In the medial compartment, there were significant increases in both median peak pressures (p=0.017) and median average pressures (p=0.047) in the root cut state compared to the intact state (+636 kilopascal (kPA) [246-1026 95% confidence interval (95%CI)] and +190 kPA [49-330 95%CI] respectively). All-inside meniscal root repair restored median peak pressures and median average pressures to approach that of the intact meniscus (p=0.293; +311 kPA [-79-701 95%CI] and p=0.171; +137 kPA [-3-277 95%CI] respectively). In the lateral compartment, there were also significant increases in both median peak pressures (p=0.025) and median average pressures (p=0.05) in the root cut state compared to the intact state (+718 kPA [246-1191 95%CI] and +203 kPA [51-355 95%CI]) respectively). All-inside meniscal root repair restored median peak pressures and median average pressures to be not significantly different from the intact state (p=0.399; +322 kPA [-150-795 95%CI] and p=0.97; +18 kPA [- 134-171 95%CI] respectively). There was no difference between repair techniques regarding load to failure (p=0.896). CONCLUSIONS: All-inside meniscal root repair restores median peak and average pressures that approach that of the native, intact meniscus. Compared to a transtibial meniscal root repair technique, all-inside repair demonstrated equivalent load to failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10392408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103924082023-08-02 Poster 145: A Biomechanical Comparison of All-Inside versus Trans-tibial Meniscal Root Repair Techniques Pasic, Nicholas Dragoo, Jason Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of an all-inside meniscal root repair procedure versus transtibial repair METHODS: Nine paired cadaveric knees were prepared with pressure mapping sensors and underwent pressure testing to obtain peak pressures, average pressures, and femorotibial contact area in both the medial and lateral compartments. Testing was performed in three states: meniscus intact, meniscal root cut, and following meniscal root repair with all-inside repair technique. Additionally, testing was completed on eight pairs of cadaveric knees to compare stiffness and maximal load to failure between all-inside and transtibial meniscal root repair techniques. RESULTS: In the medial compartment, there were significant increases in both median peak pressures (p=0.017) and median average pressures (p=0.047) in the root cut state compared to the intact state (+636 kilopascal (kPA) [246-1026 95% confidence interval (95%CI)] and +190 kPA [49-330 95%CI] respectively). All-inside meniscal root repair restored median peak pressures and median average pressures to approach that of the intact meniscus (p=0.293; +311 kPA [-79-701 95%CI] and p=0.171; +137 kPA [-3-277 95%CI] respectively). In the lateral compartment, there were also significant increases in both median peak pressures (p=0.025) and median average pressures (p=0.05) in the root cut state compared to the intact state (+718 kPA [246-1191 95%CI] and +203 kPA [51-355 95%CI]) respectively). All-inside meniscal root repair restored median peak pressures and median average pressures to be not significantly different from the intact state (p=0.399; +322 kPA [-150-795 95%CI] and p=0.97; +18 kPA [- 134-171 95%CI] respectively). There was no difference between repair techniques regarding load to failure (p=0.896). CONCLUSIONS: All-inside meniscal root repair restores median peak and average pressures that approach that of the native, intact meniscus. Compared to a transtibial meniscal root repair technique, all-inside repair demonstrated equivalent load to failure. SAGE Publications 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10392408/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00135 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Pasic, Nicholas
Dragoo, Jason
Poster 145: A Biomechanical Comparison of All-Inside versus Trans-tibial Meniscal Root Repair Techniques
title Poster 145: A Biomechanical Comparison of All-Inside versus Trans-tibial Meniscal Root Repair Techniques
title_full Poster 145: A Biomechanical Comparison of All-Inside versus Trans-tibial Meniscal Root Repair Techniques
title_fullStr Poster 145: A Biomechanical Comparison of All-Inside versus Trans-tibial Meniscal Root Repair Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Poster 145: A Biomechanical Comparison of All-Inside versus Trans-tibial Meniscal Root Repair Techniques
title_short Poster 145: A Biomechanical Comparison of All-Inside versus Trans-tibial Meniscal Root Repair Techniques
title_sort poster 145: a biomechanical comparison of all-inside versus trans-tibial meniscal root repair techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392408/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00135
work_keys_str_mv AT pasicnicholas poster145abiomechanicalcomparisonofallinsideversustranstibialmeniscalrootrepairtechniques
AT dragoojason poster145abiomechanicalcomparisonofallinsideversustranstibialmeniscalrootrepairtechniques