Cargando…

Paper 06: Is There a Home-Field Advantage in Sports Medicine Clinic? Comparing Well-Being Outcomes of Two Staffing Models

OBJECTIVES: LEARNING OBJECTIVES: 1. Define differences between integrated versus rotating team-based models of care. 2. Identify tools to assess professional fulfillment, burnout, and clinical efficiency. 3. Understand the impact of integrated versus rotating team-based care models on care team memb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atanda, Alfred, Falasca, Magdalena, Antal, Holly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392532/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00032
_version_ 1785082984896921600
author Atanda, Alfred
Falasca, Magdalena
Antal, Holly
author_facet Atanda, Alfred
Falasca, Magdalena
Antal, Holly
author_sort Atanda, Alfred
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: LEARNING OBJECTIVES: 1. Define differences between integrated versus rotating team-based models of care. 2. Identify tools to assess professional fulfillment, burnout, and clinical efficiency. 3. Understand the impact of integrated versus rotating team-based care models on care team members well-being. PROJECT OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Team-based healthcare improves patient access, billable services, and recruitment/retention (1). The staff roles and tasks impacts working to top of license (2) which likely contribute to professional fulfillment and well-being at work. However, well-being measures comparing team-staffing models have not been described. We compare well-being measures of an Integrated Consistent Care-Team Model (ICCM) with Rotating Care-Team Model (RTM) in pediatric sports medicine clinics. Our hypothesis is that ICCM providers and staff would consistently demonstrate greater professional fulfillment, less burnout, greater clinical efficiency, and more advanced team development compared to RTM providers and staff. METHODS: We identified an ICCM and RTM model within one healthcare system. The ICCM group includes one core team of pediatric sports medicine providers and staff (n=6), consistently located in the same outpatient practice setting. The RTM includes varying provider and staff team members at varying locations (n=7). All care team members from both models completed three assessments (at 0 and 7 months) of professional fulfillment, burnout, and perception of team development. Metrics used included the Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI), a 16-item survey measuring professional fulfillment and burnout, the Mini-Z_2.0, a 10-item survey measuring burnout via Supportive Work Environment and Practice Efficiency subscales, and the Team Development Measure (TDM), a 31-item survey measuring team development. EMR Data was also analyzed to determine trends in efficiency and practice across the RTM and ICCM groups. RESULTS: PFI results taken at both time periods indicated higher rates of Professional Fulfillment in the ICCM group than the RTM Group. A cutoff point of 3.00 or greater is indicative of professional fulfillment and was demonstrated by the ICCM group at both time points (M=3.31, SD=0.33; M=3.37, SD=0.30). RTM team members scored significantly higher (unfavorable) than ICCM team members on PFI Overall Burnout Scale and showed higher scores in Work Exhaustion and Interpersonal Disengagement subscales. Mini-Z_2.0 results were favorable for ICCM team members on the Supportive Work Environment and Practice Efficiency subscales at both time periods. Overall scaled scores for the ICCM team were greater than the cutoff point of 40 at both time periods, indicating a joyful workplace, in contrast to RTM scores which were below the cutoff points on subscale scores and overall scores at both time periods. ICCM members also trended higher in team development scores on the TDM survey at both time periods. A Welch’s t-test was performed for the Mini-Z and PFI data collection and determined results were statistically significant across both samples and time periods. Furthermore, ICCM providers yielded better EMR efficiency metrics than their RTM colleagues, including less in basket management, PJ time, clinical review and EMR time on unscheduled days at both time periods. Both groups averaged a similar number of appointments per day at each time point (M=9.51 in January; M=11.61 in August). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes differences in well-being measures for providers and staff within a pediatric sports medicine ambulatory clinic setting when comparing two different care team models across a 7-month period, suggesting that consistent care-team with core providers and less variability has advantages to provider and staff well-being. REFERENCES: 1. Jerzak, J., Siddiqui, G., & Sinsky, C. A. (2019). Advanced team-based care: how we made it work. The Journal of family practice, 68(7), E1-E8. 2. Reiss-Brennan B, Brunisholz KD, Dredge C, et al. Association of Integrated Team-Based Care With Health Care Quality, Utilization, and Cost. JAMA. 2016;316(8):826–834. 3. Panagioti M, Panagopoulou E, Bower P, et al. Controlled Interventions to Reduce Burnout in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):195–205.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10392532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103925322023-08-02 Paper 06: Is There a Home-Field Advantage in Sports Medicine Clinic? Comparing Well-Being Outcomes of Two Staffing Models Atanda, Alfred Falasca, Magdalena Antal, Holly Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: LEARNING OBJECTIVES: 1. Define differences between integrated versus rotating team-based models of care. 2. Identify tools to assess professional fulfillment, burnout, and clinical efficiency. 3. Understand the impact of integrated versus rotating team-based care models on care team members well-being. PROJECT OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Team-based healthcare improves patient access, billable services, and recruitment/retention (1). The staff roles and tasks impacts working to top of license (2) which likely contribute to professional fulfillment and well-being at work. However, well-being measures comparing team-staffing models have not been described. We compare well-being measures of an Integrated Consistent Care-Team Model (ICCM) with Rotating Care-Team Model (RTM) in pediatric sports medicine clinics. Our hypothesis is that ICCM providers and staff would consistently demonstrate greater professional fulfillment, less burnout, greater clinical efficiency, and more advanced team development compared to RTM providers and staff. METHODS: We identified an ICCM and RTM model within one healthcare system. The ICCM group includes one core team of pediatric sports medicine providers and staff (n=6), consistently located in the same outpatient practice setting. The RTM includes varying provider and staff team members at varying locations (n=7). All care team members from both models completed three assessments (at 0 and 7 months) of professional fulfillment, burnout, and perception of team development. Metrics used included the Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI), a 16-item survey measuring professional fulfillment and burnout, the Mini-Z_2.0, a 10-item survey measuring burnout via Supportive Work Environment and Practice Efficiency subscales, and the Team Development Measure (TDM), a 31-item survey measuring team development. EMR Data was also analyzed to determine trends in efficiency and practice across the RTM and ICCM groups. RESULTS: PFI results taken at both time periods indicated higher rates of Professional Fulfillment in the ICCM group than the RTM Group. A cutoff point of 3.00 or greater is indicative of professional fulfillment and was demonstrated by the ICCM group at both time points (M=3.31, SD=0.33; M=3.37, SD=0.30). RTM team members scored significantly higher (unfavorable) than ICCM team members on PFI Overall Burnout Scale and showed higher scores in Work Exhaustion and Interpersonal Disengagement subscales. Mini-Z_2.0 results were favorable for ICCM team members on the Supportive Work Environment and Practice Efficiency subscales at both time periods. Overall scaled scores for the ICCM team were greater than the cutoff point of 40 at both time periods, indicating a joyful workplace, in contrast to RTM scores which were below the cutoff points on subscale scores and overall scores at both time periods. ICCM members also trended higher in team development scores on the TDM survey at both time periods. A Welch’s t-test was performed for the Mini-Z and PFI data collection and determined results were statistically significant across both samples and time periods. Furthermore, ICCM providers yielded better EMR efficiency metrics than their RTM colleagues, including less in basket management, PJ time, clinical review and EMR time on unscheduled days at both time periods. Both groups averaged a similar number of appointments per day at each time point (M=9.51 in January; M=11.61 in August). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes differences in well-being measures for providers and staff within a pediatric sports medicine ambulatory clinic setting when comparing two different care team models across a 7-month period, suggesting that consistent care-team with core providers and less variability has advantages to provider and staff well-being. REFERENCES: 1. Jerzak, J., Siddiqui, G., & Sinsky, C. A. (2019). Advanced team-based care: how we made it work. The Journal of family practice, 68(7), E1-E8. 2. Reiss-Brennan B, Brunisholz KD, Dredge C, et al. Association of Integrated Team-Based Care With Health Care Quality, Utilization, and Cost. JAMA. 2016;316(8):826–834. 3. Panagioti M, Panagopoulou E, Bower P, et al. Controlled Interventions to Reduce Burnout in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):195–205. SAGE Publications 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10392532/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00032 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Atanda, Alfred
Falasca, Magdalena
Antal, Holly
Paper 06: Is There a Home-Field Advantage in Sports Medicine Clinic? Comparing Well-Being Outcomes of Two Staffing Models
title Paper 06: Is There a Home-Field Advantage in Sports Medicine Clinic? Comparing Well-Being Outcomes of Two Staffing Models
title_full Paper 06: Is There a Home-Field Advantage in Sports Medicine Clinic? Comparing Well-Being Outcomes of Two Staffing Models
title_fullStr Paper 06: Is There a Home-Field Advantage in Sports Medicine Clinic? Comparing Well-Being Outcomes of Two Staffing Models
title_full_unstemmed Paper 06: Is There a Home-Field Advantage in Sports Medicine Clinic? Comparing Well-Being Outcomes of Two Staffing Models
title_short Paper 06: Is There a Home-Field Advantage in Sports Medicine Clinic? Comparing Well-Being Outcomes of Two Staffing Models
title_sort paper 06: is there a home-field advantage in sports medicine clinic? comparing well-being outcomes of two staffing models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392532/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967123S00032
work_keys_str_mv AT atandaalfred paper06isthereahomefieldadvantageinsportsmedicinecliniccomparingwellbeingoutcomesoftwostaffingmodels
AT falascamagdalena paper06isthereahomefieldadvantageinsportsmedicinecliniccomparingwellbeingoutcomesoftwostaffingmodels
AT antalholly paper06isthereahomefieldadvantageinsportsmedicinecliniccomparingwellbeingoutcomesoftwostaffingmodels