Cargando…

Predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? A comparison with breast MRI

OBJECTIVES: Image monitoring is essential to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Whilst breast MRI is the gold-standard technique, evidence suggests contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is comparable. We investigate whether the addition of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savaridas, Sarah L, Vinnicombe, Sarah J, Warwick, Violet, Evans, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37399083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220921
_version_ 1785083010230517760
author Savaridas, Sarah L
Vinnicombe, Sarah J
Warwick, Violet
Evans, Andrew
author_facet Savaridas, Sarah L
Vinnicombe, Sarah J
Warwick, Violet
Evans, Andrew
author_sort Savaridas, Sarah L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Image monitoring is essential to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Whilst breast MRI is the gold-standard technique, evidence suggests contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is comparable. We investigate whether the addition of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to CESM increases the accuracy of response prediction. METHODS: Women receiving NACT for breast cancer were included. Imaging with CESM+DBT and MRI was performed post-NACT. Imaging appearance was compared with pathological specimens. Accuracy for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) and concordance with size of residual disease was calculated. RESULTS: Sixteen cancers in 14 patients were included, 10 demonstrated pCR. Greatest accuracy for predicting pCR was with CESM enhancement (accuracy: 81.3%, sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 57.1%), followed by MRI (accuracy: 62.5%, sensitivity: 44.4%, specificity: 85.7%). Concordance with invasive tumour size was greater for CESM enhancement than MRI, concordance-coefficients 0.70 vs 0.66 respectively. MRI demonstrated greatest concordance with whole tumour size followed by CESM+microcalcification, concordance coefficients 0.86 vs 0.69. DBT did not improve accuracy for prediction of pCR or residual disease size. CESM+DBT underestimated size of residual disease, MRI overestimated but no significant differences were seen (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CESM is similar to MRI for predicting residual disease post-NACT. Size of enhancement alone demonstrates best concordance with invasive disease. Inclusion of residual microcalcification improves concordance with ductal carcinoma in situ. The addition of DBT to CESM does not improve accuracy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The addition ofDBT to CESM does not improve NACT response prediction. CESM enhancement has greatest accuracy for residual invasive disease, CESM+calcification has greater accuracy for residual in situ disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10392651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103926512023-08-02 Predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? A comparison with breast MRI Savaridas, Sarah L Vinnicombe, Sarah J Warwick, Violet Evans, Andrew Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVES: Image monitoring is essential to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Whilst breast MRI is the gold-standard technique, evidence suggests contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is comparable. We investigate whether the addition of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to CESM increases the accuracy of response prediction. METHODS: Women receiving NACT for breast cancer were included. Imaging with CESM+DBT and MRI was performed post-NACT. Imaging appearance was compared with pathological specimens. Accuracy for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) and concordance with size of residual disease was calculated. RESULTS: Sixteen cancers in 14 patients were included, 10 demonstrated pCR. Greatest accuracy for predicting pCR was with CESM enhancement (accuracy: 81.3%, sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 57.1%), followed by MRI (accuracy: 62.5%, sensitivity: 44.4%, specificity: 85.7%). Concordance with invasive tumour size was greater for CESM enhancement than MRI, concordance-coefficients 0.70 vs 0.66 respectively. MRI demonstrated greatest concordance with whole tumour size followed by CESM+microcalcification, concordance coefficients 0.86 vs 0.69. DBT did not improve accuracy for prediction of pCR or residual disease size. CESM+DBT underestimated size of residual disease, MRI overestimated but no significant differences were seen (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CESM is similar to MRI for predicting residual disease post-NACT. Size of enhancement alone demonstrates best concordance with invasive disease. Inclusion of residual microcalcification improves concordance with ductal carcinoma in situ. The addition of DBT to CESM does not improve accuracy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The addition ofDBT to CESM does not improve NACT response prediction. CESM enhancement has greatest accuracy for residual invasive disease, CESM+calcification has greater accuracy for residual in situ disease. The British Institute of Radiology. 2023-08 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10392651/ /pubmed/37399083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220921 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Savaridas, Sarah L
Vinnicombe, Sarah J
Warwick, Violet
Evans, Andrew
Predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? A comparison with breast MRI
title Predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? A comparison with breast MRI
title_full Predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? A comparison with breast MRI
title_fullStr Predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? A comparison with breast MRI
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? A comparison with breast MRI
title_short Predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? A comparison with breast MRI
title_sort predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography? a comparison with breast mri
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37399083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220921
work_keys_str_mv AT savaridassarahl predictingtheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapycantheadditionoftomosynthesisimprovetheaccuracyofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographyacomparisonwithbreastmri
AT vinnicombesarahj predictingtheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapycantheadditionoftomosynthesisimprovetheaccuracyofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographyacomparisonwithbreastmri
AT warwickviolet predictingtheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapycantheadditionoftomosynthesisimprovetheaccuracyofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographyacomparisonwithbreastmri
AT evansandrew predictingtheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapycantheadditionoftomosynthesisimprovetheaccuracyofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographyacomparisonwithbreastmri