Cargando…

Efficacy of Low-level Laser Versus High-intensity Laser Therapy in the Management of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) are effective in alleviating pain and improving functionality in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC); however, no study has compared the efficacy of these two laser treatments. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectivene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ordahan, Banu, Yigit, Fatih, Mülkoglu, Cevriye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37533657
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_626_22
_version_ 1785083091550732288
author Ordahan, Banu
Yigit, Fatih
Mülkoglu, Cevriye
author_facet Ordahan, Banu
Yigit, Fatih
Mülkoglu, Cevriye
author_sort Ordahan, Banu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) are effective in alleviating pain and improving functionality in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC); however, no study has compared the efficacy of these two laser treatments. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of LLLT and HILT in improving the shoulder joint range of motion and functional status and in reducing pain level in patients with AC. TRIAL DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel group, patient- and assessor-blinded. METHODS: A total of 45 patients (aged: 18–65 years) with complaint of shoulder pain were evaluated for inclusion criteria, which included being aged 18–65 years and a diagnosis of AC based on physical examinations. Using computer-generated random numbers, eligible patients were randomized into two groups: HILT + stretching exercise and LLLT + stretching exercise groups. Both HILT and LLLT were performed three times/week for 3 weeks. Functional status and pain of the patients were evaluated with Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while shoulder joint range of motion was measured with goniometry. All assessments were done before and 3 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients (20 in each group) completed the study. At baseline, there was no statistically significant difference in the demographic and clinical characteristics between both groups. Both the LLLT and HILT groups showed significant improvement in the VAS and SPADI scores 3 weeks after treatment; however, the improvement was significantly higher in the HILT group than the LLLT group. There was no significant improvement in goniometric scores in both groups compared with baseline. No injury or other musculoskeletal complications were recorded during or after the treatments. CONCLUSION: HILT + stretching exercise treatment was more effective than LLLT + stretching exercise for improving functional parameters and pain in patients with AC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05469672. FUNDING: None
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10393096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103930962023-08-02 Efficacy of Low-level Laser Versus High-intensity Laser Therapy in the Management of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Ordahan, Banu Yigit, Fatih Mülkoglu, Cevriye Saudi J Med Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) are effective in alleviating pain and improving functionality in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC); however, no study has compared the efficacy of these two laser treatments. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of LLLT and HILT in improving the shoulder joint range of motion and functional status and in reducing pain level in patients with AC. TRIAL DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel group, patient- and assessor-blinded. METHODS: A total of 45 patients (aged: 18–65 years) with complaint of shoulder pain were evaluated for inclusion criteria, which included being aged 18–65 years and a diagnosis of AC based on physical examinations. Using computer-generated random numbers, eligible patients were randomized into two groups: HILT + stretching exercise and LLLT + stretching exercise groups. Both HILT and LLLT were performed three times/week for 3 weeks. Functional status and pain of the patients were evaluated with Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while shoulder joint range of motion was measured with goniometry. All assessments were done before and 3 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients (20 in each group) completed the study. At baseline, there was no statistically significant difference in the demographic and clinical characteristics between both groups. Both the LLLT and HILT groups showed significant improvement in the VAS and SPADI scores 3 weeks after treatment; however, the improvement was significantly higher in the HILT group than the LLLT group. There was no significant improvement in goniometric scores in both groups compared with baseline. No injury or other musculoskeletal complications were recorded during or after the treatments. CONCLUSION: HILT + stretching exercise treatment was more effective than LLLT + stretching exercise for improving functional parameters and pain in patients with AC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05469672. FUNDING: None Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10393096/ /pubmed/37533657 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_626_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ordahan, Banu
Yigit, Fatih
Mülkoglu, Cevriye
Efficacy of Low-level Laser Versus High-intensity Laser Therapy in the Management of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Efficacy of Low-level Laser Versus High-intensity Laser Therapy in the Management of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Efficacy of Low-level Laser Versus High-intensity Laser Therapy in the Management of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of Low-level Laser Versus High-intensity Laser Therapy in the Management of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Low-level Laser Versus High-intensity Laser Therapy in the Management of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Efficacy of Low-level Laser Versus High-intensity Laser Therapy in the Management of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort efficacy of low-level laser versus high-intensity laser therapy in the management of adhesive capsulitis: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37533657
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_626_22
work_keys_str_mv AT ordahanbanu efficacyoflowlevellaserversushighintensitylasertherapyinthemanagementofadhesivecapsulitisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yigitfatih efficacyoflowlevellaserversushighintensitylasertherapyinthemanagementofadhesivecapsulitisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mulkoglucevriye efficacyoflowlevellaserversushighintensitylasertherapyinthemanagementofadhesivecapsulitisarandomizedclinicaltrial