Cargando…

Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning

PURPOSE: To explore and validate the utility of machine learning (ML) methods using a limited sample size to predict changes in visual acuity and keratometry 2 years following corneal crosslinking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus. METHODS: The study included all consecutive patients with progressiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yu, Shen, Dan, Wang, Hao-yu, Qi, Meng-ying, Zeng, Qing-yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37534322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1146529
_version_ 1785083126534373376
author Liu, Yu
Shen, Dan
Wang, Hao-yu
Qi, Meng-ying
Zeng, Qing-yan
author_facet Liu, Yu
Shen, Dan
Wang, Hao-yu
Qi, Meng-ying
Zeng, Qing-yan
author_sort Liu, Yu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore and validate the utility of machine learning (ML) methods using a limited sample size to predict changes in visual acuity and keratometry 2 years following corneal crosslinking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus. METHODS: The study included all consecutive patients with progressive keratoconus who underwent CXL from July 2014 to December 2020, with a 2 year follow-up period before July 2022 to develop the model. Variables collected included patient demographics, visual acuity, spherical equivalence, and Pentacam parameters. Available case data were divided into training and testing data sets. Three ML models were evaluated based on their performance in predicting case corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (K(max)) changes compared to actual values, as indicated by average root mean squared error (RMSE) and R-squared (R(2)) values. Patients followed from July 2022 to December 2022 were included in the validation set. RESULTS: A total of 277 eyes from 195 patients were included in training and testing sets and 43 eyes from 35 patients were included in the validation set. The baseline CDVA (26.7%) and the ratio of steep keratometry to flat keratometry (K(2)/K(1); 13.8%) were closely associated with case CDVA changes. The baseline ratio of K(max) to mean keratometry (K(max)/K(mean); 20.9%) was closely associated with case K(max) changes. Using these metrics, the best-performing ML model was XGBoost, which produced predicted values closest to the actual values for both CDVA and K(max) changes in testing set (R(2) = 0.9993 and 0.9888) and validation set (R(2) = 0.8956 and 0.8382). CONCLUSION: Application of a ML approach using XGBoost, and incorporation of identifiable parameters, considerably improved variation prediction accuracy of both CDVA and K(max) 2 years after CXL for treatment of progressive keratoconus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10393251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103932512023-08-02 Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning Liu, Yu Shen, Dan Wang, Hao-yu Qi, Meng-ying Zeng, Qing-yan Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: To explore and validate the utility of machine learning (ML) methods using a limited sample size to predict changes in visual acuity and keratometry 2 years following corneal crosslinking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus. METHODS: The study included all consecutive patients with progressive keratoconus who underwent CXL from July 2014 to December 2020, with a 2 year follow-up period before July 2022 to develop the model. Variables collected included patient demographics, visual acuity, spherical equivalence, and Pentacam parameters. Available case data were divided into training and testing data sets. Three ML models were evaluated based on their performance in predicting case corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (K(max)) changes compared to actual values, as indicated by average root mean squared error (RMSE) and R-squared (R(2)) values. Patients followed from July 2022 to December 2022 were included in the validation set. RESULTS: A total of 277 eyes from 195 patients were included in training and testing sets and 43 eyes from 35 patients were included in the validation set. The baseline CDVA (26.7%) and the ratio of steep keratometry to flat keratometry (K(2)/K(1); 13.8%) were closely associated with case CDVA changes. The baseline ratio of K(max) to mean keratometry (K(max)/K(mean); 20.9%) was closely associated with case K(max) changes. Using these metrics, the best-performing ML model was XGBoost, which produced predicted values closest to the actual values for both CDVA and K(max) changes in testing set (R(2) = 0.9993 and 0.9888) and validation set (R(2) = 0.8956 and 0.8382). CONCLUSION: Application of a ML approach using XGBoost, and incorporation of identifiable parameters, considerably improved variation prediction accuracy of both CDVA and K(max) 2 years after CXL for treatment of progressive keratoconus. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10393251/ /pubmed/37534322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1146529 Text en Copyright © 2023 Liu, Shen, Wang, Qi and Zeng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Liu, Yu
Shen, Dan
Wang, Hao-yu
Qi, Meng-ying
Zeng, Qing-yan
Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning
title Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning
title_full Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning
title_fullStr Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning
title_short Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning
title_sort development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37534322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1146529
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyu developmentandvalidationtopredictvisualacuityandkeratometrytwoyearsaftercornealcrosslinkingwithprogressivekeratoconusbymachinelearning
AT shendan developmentandvalidationtopredictvisualacuityandkeratometrytwoyearsaftercornealcrosslinkingwithprogressivekeratoconusbymachinelearning
AT wanghaoyu developmentandvalidationtopredictvisualacuityandkeratometrytwoyearsaftercornealcrosslinkingwithprogressivekeratoconusbymachinelearning
AT qimengying developmentandvalidationtopredictvisualacuityandkeratometrytwoyearsaftercornealcrosslinkingwithprogressivekeratoconusbymachinelearning
AT zengqingyan developmentandvalidationtopredictvisualacuityandkeratometrytwoyearsaftercornealcrosslinkingwithprogressivekeratoconusbymachinelearning