Cargando…

Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is preventable. Screening is important for early detection. However, even in high-income countries, coverage is sub-optimal. We identified socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage. METHODS: In Denmark, women aged 23–64 are free o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabatabai, Milad K, Lophaven, Søren, Lauenborg, Jeannet, Holmager, Therese, Jepsen, Randi, Lynge, Elsebeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37295965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad091
_version_ 1785083171111436288
author Tabatabai, Milad K
Lophaven, Søren
Lauenborg, Jeannet
Holmager, Therese
Jepsen, Randi
Lynge, Elsebeth
author_facet Tabatabai, Milad K
Lophaven, Søren
Lauenborg, Jeannet
Holmager, Therese
Jepsen, Randi
Lynge, Elsebeth
author_sort Tabatabai, Milad K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is preventable. Screening is important for early detection. However, even in high-income countries, coverage is sub-optimal. We identified socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage. METHODS: In Denmark, women aged 23–64 are free of charge personally invited to screening. All cervical cell samples are registered centrally in the Patobank. We linked data from the Lolland–Falster Health Study (LOFUS) with Patobank data. LOFUS was a population-based health survey undertaken in 2016–2020. With logistic regression, coverage defined as ≥1 cervical sample registered within a 6-year period from 2015 to 2020 was compared across levels of risk factors expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 13 406 women of screening aged 23–64 and invited to LOFUS, 72% had ≥1 cervical sample registered. Non-participation in LOFUS was a strong predictor of low coverage; aOR 0.32; 95% CI 0.31–0.36. Among LOFUS participants, education was a strong predictor of coverage in univariate analysis, OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.48–0.71, but this association disappeared in multi-variate analysis, aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66–1.10. In multi-variate analysis, predictors of low coverage were high age, living without a partner, retired, current smoker, poor self-rated health, elevated blood pressure and elevated glycated haemoglobin. CONCLUSIONS: Women with low cervical screening coverage had limited contact to healthcare, exemplified by non-participation in LOFUS, and pertinent health and social problems, exemplified by elevated blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin, poor self-rated health, and retirement already in screening age. Structural changes in screening are needed to reach non-screened women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10393493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103934932023-08-02 Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark Tabatabai, Milad K Lophaven, Søren Lauenborg, Jeannet Holmager, Therese Jepsen, Randi Lynge, Elsebeth Eur J Public Health Social Determinants BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is preventable. Screening is important for early detection. However, even in high-income countries, coverage is sub-optimal. We identified socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage. METHODS: In Denmark, women aged 23–64 are free of charge personally invited to screening. All cervical cell samples are registered centrally in the Patobank. We linked data from the Lolland–Falster Health Study (LOFUS) with Patobank data. LOFUS was a population-based health survey undertaken in 2016–2020. With logistic regression, coverage defined as ≥1 cervical sample registered within a 6-year period from 2015 to 2020 was compared across levels of risk factors expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 13 406 women of screening aged 23–64 and invited to LOFUS, 72% had ≥1 cervical sample registered. Non-participation in LOFUS was a strong predictor of low coverage; aOR 0.32; 95% CI 0.31–0.36. Among LOFUS participants, education was a strong predictor of coverage in univariate analysis, OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.48–0.71, but this association disappeared in multi-variate analysis, aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66–1.10. In multi-variate analysis, predictors of low coverage were high age, living without a partner, retired, current smoker, poor self-rated health, elevated blood pressure and elevated glycated haemoglobin. CONCLUSIONS: Women with low cervical screening coverage had limited contact to healthcare, exemplified by non-participation in LOFUS, and pertinent health and social problems, exemplified by elevated blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin, poor self-rated health, and retirement already in screening age. Structural changes in screening are needed to reach non-screened women. Oxford University Press 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10393493/ /pubmed/37295965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad091 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Social Determinants
Tabatabai, Milad K
Lophaven, Søren
Lauenborg, Jeannet
Holmager, Therese
Jepsen, Randi
Lynge, Elsebeth
Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark
title Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark
title_full Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark
title_fullStr Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark
title_short Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark
title_sort socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: lolland–falster health study, denmark
topic Social Determinants
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37295965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad091
work_keys_str_mv AT tabatabaimiladk socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark
AT lophavensøren socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark
AT lauenborgjeannet socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark
AT holmagertherese socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark
AT jepsenrandi socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark
AT lyngeelsebeth socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark