Cargando…
Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is preventable. Screening is important for early detection. However, even in high-income countries, coverage is sub-optimal. We identified socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage. METHODS: In Denmark, women aged 23–64 are free o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37295965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad091 |
_version_ | 1785083171111436288 |
---|---|
author | Tabatabai, Milad K Lophaven, Søren Lauenborg, Jeannet Holmager, Therese Jepsen, Randi Lynge, Elsebeth |
author_facet | Tabatabai, Milad K Lophaven, Søren Lauenborg, Jeannet Holmager, Therese Jepsen, Randi Lynge, Elsebeth |
author_sort | Tabatabai, Milad K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is preventable. Screening is important for early detection. However, even in high-income countries, coverage is sub-optimal. We identified socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage. METHODS: In Denmark, women aged 23–64 are free of charge personally invited to screening. All cervical cell samples are registered centrally in the Patobank. We linked data from the Lolland–Falster Health Study (LOFUS) with Patobank data. LOFUS was a population-based health survey undertaken in 2016–2020. With logistic regression, coverage defined as ≥1 cervical sample registered within a 6-year period from 2015 to 2020 was compared across levels of risk factors expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 13 406 women of screening aged 23–64 and invited to LOFUS, 72% had ≥1 cervical sample registered. Non-participation in LOFUS was a strong predictor of low coverage; aOR 0.32; 95% CI 0.31–0.36. Among LOFUS participants, education was a strong predictor of coverage in univariate analysis, OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.48–0.71, but this association disappeared in multi-variate analysis, aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66–1.10. In multi-variate analysis, predictors of low coverage were high age, living without a partner, retired, current smoker, poor self-rated health, elevated blood pressure and elevated glycated haemoglobin. CONCLUSIONS: Women with low cervical screening coverage had limited contact to healthcare, exemplified by non-participation in LOFUS, and pertinent health and social problems, exemplified by elevated blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin, poor self-rated health, and retirement already in screening age. Structural changes in screening are needed to reach non-screened women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10393493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103934932023-08-02 Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark Tabatabai, Milad K Lophaven, Søren Lauenborg, Jeannet Holmager, Therese Jepsen, Randi Lynge, Elsebeth Eur J Public Health Social Determinants BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is preventable. Screening is important for early detection. However, even in high-income countries, coverage is sub-optimal. We identified socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage. METHODS: In Denmark, women aged 23–64 are free of charge personally invited to screening. All cervical cell samples are registered centrally in the Patobank. We linked data from the Lolland–Falster Health Study (LOFUS) with Patobank data. LOFUS was a population-based health survey undertaken in 2016–2020. With logistic regression, coverage defined as ≥1 cervical sample registered within a 6-year period from 2015 to 2020 was compared across levels of risk factors expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 13 406 women of screening aged 23–64 and invited to LOFUS, 72% had ≥1 cervical sample registered. Non-participation in LOFUS was a strong predictor of low coverage; aOR 0.32; 95% CI 0.31–0.36. Among LOFUS participants, education was a strong predictor of coverage in univariate analysis, OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.48–0.71, but this association disappeared in multi-variate analysis, aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66–1.10. In multi-variate analysis, predictors of low coverage were high age, living without a partner, retired, current smoker, poor self-rated health, elevated blood pressure and elevated glycated haemoglobin. CONCLUSIONS: Women with low cervical screening coverage had limited contact to healthcare, exemplified by non-participation in LOFUS, and pertinent health and social problems, exemplified by elevated blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin, poor self-rated health, and retirement already in screening age. Structural changes in screening are needed to reach non-screened women. Oxford University Press 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10393493/ /pubmed/37295965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad091 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Social Determinants Tabatabai, Milad K Lophaven, Søren Lauenborg, Jeannet Holmager, Therese Jepsen, Randi Lynge, Elsebeth Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark |
title | Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark |
title_full | Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark |
title_fullStr | Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark |
title_full_unstemmed | Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark |
title_short | Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland–Falster Health Study, Denmark |
title_sort | socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: lolland–falster health study, denmark |
topic | Social Determinants |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37295965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tabatabaimiladk socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark AT lophavensøren socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark AT lauenborgjeannet socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark AT holmagertherese socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark AT jepsenrandi socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark AT lyngeelsebeth socioeconomiclifestyleandbiologicaldeterminantsofcervicalscreeningcoveragelollandfalsterhealthstudydenmark |