Cargando…

Bone Cement Waste in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Study of Scope and Cost

BACKGROUND: Medical waste is both costly and detrimental to the environment, and operating room waste represents a substantial portion of this. To the authors’ knowledge, bone cement waste in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not previously been studied. The vast majority of TKA are cemented, and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tompkins, Geoffrey S., Howe, Kevin K., Valderrama, Rebecca, Sypher, Katie, Griffin, Michael, Chiu, Shih Ting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37539365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101162
_version_ 1785083207060815872
author Tompkins, Geoffrey S.
Howe, Kevin K.
Valderrama, Rebecca
Sypher, Katie
Griffin, Michael
Chiu, Shih Ting
author_facet Tompkins, Geoffrey S.
Howe, Kevin K.
Valderrama, Rebecca
Sypher, Katie
Griffin, Michael
Chiu, Shih Ting
author_sort Tompkins, Geoffrey S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical waste is both costly and detrimental to the environment, and operating room waste represents a substantial portion of this. To the authors’ knowledge, bone cement waste in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not previously been studied. The vast majority of TKA are cemented, and the volume of TKA is forecast to increase. Given this, we studied the waste resulting from the routine use of 2 40-gram bags of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) powder during cementing in primary TKA. METHODS: We first studied the yield of commercially available plain and gentamicin medium-viscosity bone cement powder and calculated the cost/gram of product. We then collected the PMMA remaining after primary TKA to determine the average amount of waste, its cost, and possible correlations with patient and implant metrics that could improve efficiency and reduce waste of PMMA. RESULTS: Overall, PMMA waste averaged 59% per TKA, at a median cost of $129 per case. Cost of waste was greater when gentamicin cement was used, as its cost was 2.5X that of plain cement. Implant sizes and surface area ranges were identified that could reliably allow the use of a single 40-gram package of powder, potentially reducing PMMA waste. CONCLUSIONS: While it is acknowledged that zero-waste cementing is not practical, any reduction in waste that does not compromise either the flow of surgery or the adequacy of fixation would be beneficial. Reevaluation of PMMA techniques could reduce waste, resulting in both cost savings and improved sustainability in arthroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10393734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103937342023-08-03 Bone Cement Waste in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Study of Scope and Cost Tompkins, Geoffrey S. Howe, Kevin K. Valderrama, Rebecca Sypher, Katie Griffin, Michael Chiu, Shih Ting Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: Medical waste is both costly and detrimental to the environment, and operating room waste represents a substantial portion of this. To the authors’ knowledge, bone cement waste in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not previously been studied. The vast majority of TKA are cemented, and the volume of TKA is forecast to increase. Given this, we studied the waste resulting from the routine use of 2 40-gram bags of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) powder during cementing in primary TKA. METHODS: We first studied the yield of commercially available plain and gentamicin medium-viscosity bone cement powder and calculated the cost/gram of product. We then collected the PMMA remaining after primary TKA to determine the average amount of waste, its cost, and possible correlations with patient and implant metrics that could improve efficiency and reduce waste of PMMA. RESULTS: Overall, PMMA waste averaged 59% per TKA, at a median cost of $129 per case. Cost of waste was greater when gentamicin cement was used, as its cost was 2.5X that of plain cement. Implant sizes and surface area ranges were identified that could reliably allow the use of a single 40-gram package of powder, potentially reducing PMMA waste. CONCLUSIONS: While it is acknowledged that zero-waste cementing is not practical, any reduction in waste that does not compromise either the flow of surgery or the adequacy of fixation would be beneficial. Reevaluation of PMMA techniques could reduce waste, resulting in both cost savings and improved sustainability in arthroplasty. Elsevier 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10393734/ /pubmed/37539365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101162 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tompkins, Geoffrey S.
Howe, Kevin K.
Valderrama, Rebecca
Sypher, Katie
Griffin, Michael
Chiu, Shih Ting
Bone Cement Waste in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Study of Scope and Cost
title Bone Cement Waste in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Study of Scope and Cost
title_full Bone Cement Waste in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Study of Scope and Cost
title_fullStr Bone Cement Waste in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Study of Scope and Cost
title_full_unstemmed Bone Cement Waste in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Study of Scope and Cost
title_short Bone Cement Waste in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Study of Scope and Cost
title_sort bone cement waste in total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary study of scope and cost
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37539365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101162
work_keys_str_mv AT tompkinsgeoffreys bonecementwasteintotalkneearthroplastyapreliminarystudyofscopeandcost
AT howekevink bonecementwasteintotalkneearthroplastyapreliminarystudyofscopeandcost
AT valderramarebecca bonecementwasteintotalkneearthroplastyapreliminarystudyofscopeandcost
AT sypherkatie bonecementwasteintotalkneearthroplastyapreliminarystudyofscopeandcost
AT griffinmichael bonecementwasteintotalkneearthroplastyapreliminarystudyofscopeandcost
AT chiushihting bonecementwasteintotalkneearthroplastyapreliminarystudyofscopeandcost