Cargando…

Rapid virtual fractional flow reserve using 3D computational fluid dynamics

AIMS: Over the last ten years, virtual Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) has improved the utility of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), a globally recommended assessment to guide coronary interventions. Although the speed of vFFR computation has accelerated, techniques utilising full 3D computational fluid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Newman, Thomas, Borker, Raunak, Aubiniere-Robb, Louise, Hendrickson, Justin, Choudhury, Dipankar, Halliday, Ian, Fenner, John, Narracott, Andrew, Hose, D Rodney, Gosling, Rebecca, Gunn, Julian P, Morris, Paul D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad028
_version_ 1785083242596007936
author Newman, Thomas
Borker, Raunak
Aubiniere-Robb, Louise
Hendrickson, Justin
Choudhury, Dipankar
Halliday, Ian
Fenner, John
Narracott, Andrew
Hose, D Rodney
Gosling, Rebecca
Gunn, Julian P
Morris, Paul D
author_facet Newman, Thomas
Borker, Raunak
Aubiniere-Robb, Louise
Hendrickson, Justin
Choudhury, Dipankar
Halliday, Ian
Fenner, John
Narracott, Andrew
Hose, D Rodney
Gosling, Rebecca
Gunn, Julian P
Morris, Paul D
author_sort Newman, Thomas
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Over the last ten years, virtual Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) has improved the utility of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), a globally recommended assessment to guide coronary interventions. Although the speed of vFFR computation has accelerated, techniques utilising full 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions rather than simplified analytical solutions still require significant time to compute. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study investigated the speed, accuracy and cost of a novel 3D-CFD software method based upon a graphic processing unit (GPU) computation, compared with the existing fastest central processing unit (CPU)-based 3D-CFD technique, on 40 angiographic cases. The novel GPU simulation was significantly faster than the CPU method (median 31.7 s (Interquartile Range (IQR) 24.0–44.4s) vs. 607.5 s (490–964 s), P < 0.0001). The novel GPU technique was 99.6% (IQR 99.3–99.9) accurate relative to the CPU method. The initial cost of the GPU hardware was greater than the CPU (£4080 vs. £2876), but the median energy consumption per case was significantly less using the GPU method (8.44 (6.80–13.39) Wh vs. 2.60 (2.16–3.12) Wh, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that vFFR can be computed using 3D-CFD with up to 28-fold acceleration than previous techniques with no clinically significant sacrifice in accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10393878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103938782023-08-03 Rapid virtual fractional flow reserve using 3D computational fluid dynamics Newman, Thomas Borker, Raunak Aubiniere-Robb, Louise Hendrickson, Justin Choudhury, Dipankar Halliday, Ian Fenner, John Narracott, Andrew Hose, D Rodney Gosling, Rebecca Gunn, Julian P Morris, Paul D Eur Heart J Digit Health Original Article AIMS: Over the last ten years, virtual Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) has improved the utility of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), a globally recommended assessment to guide coronary interventions. Although the speed of vFFR computation has accelerated, techniques utilising full 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions rather than simplified analytical solutions still require significant time to compute. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study investigated the speed, accuracy and cost of a novel 3D-CFD software method based upon a graphic processing unit (GPU) computation, compared with the existing fastest central processing unit (CPU)-based 3D-CFD technique, on 40 angiographic cases. The novel GPU simulation was significantly faster than the CPU method (median 31.7 s (Interquartile Range (IQR) 24.0–44.4s) vs. 607.5 s (490–964 s), P < 0.0001). The novel GPU technique was 99.6% (IQR 99.3–99.9) accurate relative to the CPU method. The initial cost of the GPU hardware was greater than the CPU (£4080 vs. £2876), but the median energy consumption per case was significantly less using the GPU method (8.44 (6.80–13.39) Wh vs. 2.60 (2.16–3.12) Wh, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that vFFR can be computed using 3D-CFD with up to 28-fold acceleration than previous techniques with no clinically significant sacrifice in accuracy. Oxford University Press 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10393878/ /pubmed/37538147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad028 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Newman, Thomas
Borker, Raunak
Aubiniere-Robb, Louise
Hendrickson, Justin
Choudhury, Dipankar
Halliday, Ian
Fenner, John
Narracott, Andrew
Hose, D Rodney
Gosling, Rebecca
Gunn, Julian P
Morris, Paul D
Rapid virtual fractional flow reserve using 3D computational fluid dynamics
title Rapid virtual fractional flow reserve using 3D computational fluid dynamics
title_full Rapid virtual fractional flow reserve using 3D computational fluid dynamics
title_fullStr Rapid virtual fractional flow reserve using 3D computational fluid dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Rapid virtual fractional flow reserve using 3D computational fluid dynamics
title_short Rapid virtual fractional flow reserve using 3D computational fluid dynamics
title_sort rapid virtual fractional flow reserve using 3d computational fluid dynamics
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad028
work_keys_str_mv AT newmanthomas rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT borkerraunak rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT aubiniererobblouise rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT hendricksonjustin rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT choudhurydipankar rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT hallidayian rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT fennerjohn rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT narracottandrew rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT hosedrodney rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT goslingrebecca rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT gunnjulianp rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics
AT morrispauld rapidvirtualfractionalflowreserveusing3dcomputationalfluiddynamics