Cargando…

Evaluation of the microbiota-sparing properties of the anti-staphylococcal antibiotic afabicin

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use is associated with collateral damage to the healthy microbiota. Afabicin is a first-in-class prodrug inhibitor of the FabI enzyme that, when converted to the pharmacologically active agent afabicin desphosphono, demonstrates a staphylococcal-specific spectrum of activity....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nowakowska, J, Cameron, D R, De Martino, A, Kühn, J, Le Fresne-Languille, S, Leuillet, S, Amouzou, Y, Wittke, F, Carton, T, Le Vacon, F, Chaves, R L, Nicolas-Metral, V, Vuagniaux, G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37294305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad181
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use is associated with collateral damage to the healthy microbiota. Afabicin is a first-in-class prodrug inhibitor of the FabI enzyme that, when converted to the pharmacologically active agent afabicin desphosphono, demonstrates a staphylococcal-specific spectrum of activity. An expected benefit of highly targeted antibiotics such as afabicin is microbiome preservation. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of oral treatment with afabicin and standard-of-care antibiotics upon the murine gut microbiota, and to assess the effects of oral afabicin treatment on the human gut microbiota. METHODS: Gut microbiota effects of a 10 day oral course of afabicin treatment were monitored in mice and compared with clindamycin, linezolid and moxifloxacin at human-equivalent dose levels using 16S rDNA sequencing. Further, the gut microbiota of healthy volunteers was longitudinally assessed across 20 days of oral treatment with afabicin 240 mg twice daily. RESULTS: Afabicin treatment did not significantly alter gut microbiota diversity (Shannon H index) or richness (rarefied Chao1) in mice. Only limited changes to taxonomic abundances were observed in afabicin-treated animals. In contrast, clindamycin, linezolid and moxifloxacin each caused extensive dysbiosis in the murine model. In humans, afabicin treatment was not associated with alterations in Shannon H or rarefied Chao1 indices, nor relative taxonomic abundances, supporting the findings from the animal model. CONCLUSIONS: Oral treatment with afabicin is associated with preservation of the gut microbiota in mice and healthy subjects.