Cargando…
Image Registration in Longitudinal Bone Assessment Using Computed Tomography
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rigid image registration is an important image processing tool for the assessment of musculoskeletal chronic disease. In this paper, we critically review applications of rigid image registration in terms of similarity measurement methods over the past three years (2019–2022) in th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11914-023-00795-6 |
_version_ | 1785083248700817408 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Han Durongbhan, Pholpat Davey, Catherine E. Stok, Kathryn S. |
author_facet | Liu, Han Durongbhan, Pholpat Davey, Catherine E. Stok, Kathryn S. |
author_sort | Liu, Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rigid image registration is an important image processing tool for the assessment of musculoskeletal chronic disease. In this paper, we critically review applications of rigid image registration in terms of similarity measurement methods over the past three years (2019–2022) in the context of monitoring longitudinal changes to bone microstructure and mechanical properties using computed tomography. This review identifies critical assumptions and trade-offs underlying different similarity measurement methods used in image registration and demonstrates the effect of using different similarity measures on registration outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Image registration has been used in recent studies for: correcting positional shifts between longitudinal scans to quantify changes to bone microstructural and mechanical properties over time, developing registration-based workflows for longitudinal assessment of bone properties in pre-clinical and clinical studies, and developing and validating registration techniques for longitudinal studies. SUMMARY: In evaluating the recent literature, it was found that the assumptions at the root of different similarity measures used in rigid image registration are not always confirmed and reported. Each similarity measurement has its advantages and disadvantages, as well as underlying assumptions. Breaking these assumptions can lead to poor and inaccurate registration results. Thus, care must be taken with regards to the choice of similarity measurement and interpretation of results. We propose that understanding and verifying the assumptions of similarity measurements will enable more accurate and efficient quantitative assessments of structural changes over time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11914-023-00795-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10393902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103939022023-08-03 Image Registration in Longitudinal Bone Assessment Using Computed Tomography Liu, Han Durongbhan, Pholpat Davey, Catherine E. Stok, Kathryn S. Curr Osteoporos Rep Article PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rigid image registration is an important image processing tool for the assessment of musculoskeletal chronic disease. In this paper, we critically review applications of rigid image registration in terms of similarity measurement methods over the past three years (2019–2022) in the context of monitoring longitudinal changes to bone microstructure and mechanical properties using computed tomography. This review identifies critical assumptions and trade-offs underlying different similarity measurement methods used in image registration and demonstrates the effect of using different similarity measures on registration outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Image registration has been used in recent studies for: correcting positional shifts between longitudinal scans to quantify changes to bone microstructural and mechanical properties over time, developing registration-based workflows for longitudinal assessment of bone properties in pre-clinical and clinical studies, and developing and validating registration techniques for longitudinal studies. SUMMARY: In evaluating the recent literature, it was found that the assumptions at the root of different similarity measures used in rigid image registration are not always confirmed and reported. Each similarity measurement has its advantages and disadvantages, as well as underlying assumptions. Breaking these assumptions can lead to poor and inaccurate registration results. Thus, care must be taken with regards to the choice of similarity measurement and interpretation of results. We propose that understanding and verifying the assumptions of similarity measurements will enable more accurate and efficient quantitative assessments of structural changes over time. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11914-023-00795-6. Springer US 2023-06-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10393902/ /pubmed/37264231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11914-023-00795-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Han Durongbhan, Pholpat Davey, Catherine E. Stok, Kathryn S. Image Registration in Longitudinal Bone Assessment Using Computed Tomography |
title | Image Registration in Longitudinal Bone Assessment Using Computed Tomography |
title_full | Image Registration in Longitudinal Bone Assessment Using Computed Tomography |
title_fullStr | Image Registration in Longitudinal Bone Assessment Using Computed Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Image Registration in Longitudinal Bone Assessment Using Computed Tomography |
title_short | Image Registration in Longitudinal Bone Assessment Using Computed Tomography |
title_sort | image registration in longitudinal bone assessment using computed tomography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10393902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11914-023-00795-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuhan imageregistrationinlongitudinalboneassessmentusingcomputedtomography AT durongbhanpholpat imageregistrationinlongitudinalboneassessmentusingcomputedtomography AT daveycatherinee imageregistrationinlongitudinalboneassessmentusingcomputedtomography AT stokkathryns imageregistrationinlongitudinalboneassessmentusingcomputedtomography |