Cargando…
Death pluralism: a proposal
The debate over the determination of death has been raging for more than fifty years. Since then, objections against the diagnosis of brain death from family members of those diagnosed as dead-have been increasing and are causing some countries to take novel steps to accommodate people’s beliefs and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00139-3 |
_version_ | 1785083471244296192 |
---|---|
author | Díaz-Cobacho, Gonzalo Molina-Pérez, Alberto Rodríguez-Arias, David |
author_facet | Díaz-Cobacho, Gonzalo Molina-Pérez, Alberto Rodríguez-Arias, David |
author_sort | Díaz-Cobacho, Gonzalo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The debate over the determination of death has been raging for more than fifty years. Since then, objections against the diagnosis of brain death from family members of those diagnosed as dead-have been increasing and are causing some countries to take novel steps to accommodate people’s beliefs and preferences in the determination of death. This, coupled with criticism by some academics of the brain death criterion, raises some questions about the issues surrounding the determination of death. In this paper, we discuss some of the main approaches to death determination that have been theoretically proposed or currently put into practice and propose a new approach to death determination called "weak pluralism" as a reasonable ethical and political alternative to respect diversity in death determination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10394888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103948882023-08-03 Death pluralism: a proposal Díaz-Cobacho, Gonzalo Molina-Pérez, Alberto Rodríguez-Arias, David Philos Ethics Humanit Med Research The debate over the determination of death has been raging for more than fifty years. Since then, objections against the diagnosis of brain death from family members of those diagnosed as dead-have been increasing and are causing some countries to take novel steps to accommodate people’s beliefs and preferences in the determination of death. This, coupled with criticism by some academics of the brain death criterion, raises some questions about the issues surrounding the determination of death. In this paper, we discuss some of the main approaches to death determination that have been theoretically proposed or currently put into practice and propose a new approach to death determination called "weak pluralism" as a reasonable ethical and political alternative to respect diversity in death determination. BioMed Central 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10394888/ /pubmed/37528432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00139-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Díaz-Cobacho, Gonzalo Molina-Pérez, Alberto Rodríguez-Arias, David Death pluralism: a proposal |
title | Death pluralism: a proposal |
title_full | Death pluralism: a proposal |
title_fullStr | Death pluralism: a proposal |
title_full_unstemmed | Death pluralism: a proposal |
title_short | Death pluralism: a proposal |
title_sort | death pluralism: a proposal |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00139-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diazcobachogonzalo deathpluralismaproposal AT molinaperezalberto deathpluralismaproposal AT rodriguezariasdavid deathpluralismaproposal |