Cargando…
Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of revision knee arthroplasty (rKA) compared to non-operative treatment for the management of patients with elective, aseptic causes for a failed knee arthroplasty. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, AM...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02290-6 |
_version_ | 1785083473799675904 |
---|---|
author | Sabah, Shiraz A. Hedge, Elizabeth A. von Fritsch, Lennart Xu, Joshua Rajasekaran, Raja Bhaskara Hamilton, Thomas W. Shearman, Alexander D. Alvand, Abtin Beard, David J. Hopewell, Sally Price, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Sabah, Shiraz A. Hedge, Elizabeth A. von Fritsch, Lennart Xu, Joshua Rajasekaran, Raja Bhaskara Hamilton, Thomas W. Shearman, Alexander D. Alvand, Abtin Beard, David J. Hopewell, Sally Price, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Sabah, Shiraz A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of revision knee arthroplasty (rKA) compared to non-operative treatment for the management of patients with elective, aseptic causes for a failed knee arthroplasty. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and PsychINFO were searched from inception to 1st December 2020 for studies on patients considering elective, aseptic rKA. Patient-relevant outcomes (PROs) were defined as implant survivorship, joint function, quality of life (QoL), complications and hospital admission impact. RESULTS: No studies compared elective, aseptic rKA to non-operative management. Forty uncontrolled studies reported on PROs following elective, aseptic rKA (434434 rKA). Pooled estimates for implant survivorship were: 95.5% (95% CI 93.2–97.7%) at 1 year [seven studies (5524 rKA)], 90.8% (95% CI 87.6–94.0%) at 5 years [13 studies (5754 rKA)], 87.4% (95% CI 81.7–93.1%) at 10 years [nine studies (2188 rKA)], and 83.2% (95% CI 76.7–89.7%) at 15 years [two studies (452 rKA)]. Twelve studies (2382 rKA) reported joint function and/or QoL: all found large improvements from baseline to follow-up. Mortality rates were low (0.16% to 2% within 1 year) [four studies (353064 rKA)]. Post-operative complications were common (9.1 to 37.2% at 90 days). CONCLUSION: Higher-quality evidence is needed to support patients with decision-making in elective, aseptic rKA. This should include studies comparing operative and non-operative management. Implant survivorship following elective, aseptic rKA was ~ 96% at 1 year, ~ 91% at 5 years and ~ 87% at 10 years. Early complications were common after elective, aseptic rKA and the rates summarised here can be shared with patients during informed consent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020196922 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02290-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10394899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103948992023-08-03 Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review Sabah, Shiraz A. Hedge, Elizabeth A. von Fritsch, Lennart Xu, Joshua Rajasekaran, Raja Bhaskara Hamilton, Thomas W. Shearman, Alexander D. Alvand, Abtin Beard, David J. Hopewell, Sally Price, Andrew J. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of revision knee arthroplasty (rKA) compared to non-operative treatment for the management of patients with elective, aseptic causes for a failed knee arthroplasty. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and PsychINFO were searched from inception to 1st December 2020 for studies on patients considering elective, aseptic rKA. Patient-relevant outcomes (PROs) were defined as implant survivorship, joint function, quality of life (QoL), complications and hospital admission impact. RESULTS: No studies compared elective, aseptic rKA to non-operative management. Forty uncontrolled studies reported on PROs following elective, aseptic rKA (434434 rKA). Pooled estimates for implant survivorship were: 95.5% (95% CI 93.2–97.7%) at 1 year [seven studies (5524 rKA)], 90.8% (95% CI 87.6–94.0%) at 5 years [13 studies (5754 rKA)], 87.4% (95% CI 81.7–93.1%) at 10 years [nine studies (2188 rKA)], and 83.2% (95% CI 76.7–89.7%) at 15 years [two studies (452 rKA)]. Twelve studies (2382 rKA) reported joint function and/or QoL: all found large improvements from baseline to follow-up. Mortality rates were low (0.16% to 2% within 1 year) [four studies (353064 rKA)]. Post-operative complications were common (9.1 to 37.2% at 90 days). CONCLUSION: Higher-quality evidence is needed to support patients with decision-making in elective, aseptic rKA. This should include studies comparing operative and non-operative management. Implant survivorship following elective, aseptic rKA was ~ 96% at 1 year, ~ 91% at 5 years and ~ 87% at 10 years. Early complications were common after elective, aseptic rKA and the rates summarised here can be shared with patients during informed consent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020196922 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02290-6. BioMed Central 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10394899/ /pubmed/37528486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02290-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sabah, Shiraz A. Hedge, Elizabeth A. von Fritsch, Lennart Xu, Joshua Rajasekaran, Raja Bhaskara Hamilton, Thomas W. Shearman, Alexander D. Alvand, Abtin Beard, David J. Hopewell, Sally Price, Andrew J. Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review |
title | Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review |
title_full | Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review |
title_short | Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review |
title_sort | patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02290-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sabahshiraza patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview AT hedgeelizabetha patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview AT vonfritschlennart patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview AT xujoshua patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview AT rajasekaranrajabhaskara patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview AT hamiltonthomasw patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview AT shearmanalexanderd patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview AT alvandabtin patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview AT bearddavidj patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview AT hopewellsally patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview AT priceandrewj patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview |