Cargando…

Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of revision knee arthroplasty (rKA) compared to non-operative treatment for the management of patients with elective, aseptic causes for a failed knee arthroplasty. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, AM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabah, Shiraz A., Hedge, Elizabeth A., von Fritsch, Lennart, Xu, Joshua, Rajasekaran, Raja Bhaskara, Hamilton, Thomas W., Shearman, Alexander D., Alvand, Abtin, Beard, David J., Hopewell, Sally, Price, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02290-6
_version_ 1785083473799675904
author Sabah, Shiraz A.
Hedge, Elizabeth A.
von Fritsch, Lennart
Xu, Joshua
Rajasekaran, Raja Bhaskara
Hamilton, Thomas W.
Shearman, Alexander D.
Alvand, Abtin
Beard, David J.
Hopewell, Sally
Price, Andrew J.
author_facet Sabah, Shiraz A.
Hedge, Elizabeth A.
von Fritsch, Lennart
Xu, Joshua
Rajasekaran, Raja Bhaskara
Hamilton, Thomas W.
Shearman, Alexander D.
Alvand, Abtin
Beard, David J.
Hopewell, Sally
Price, Andrew J.
author_sort Sabah, Shiraz A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of revision knee arthroplasty (rKA) compared to non-operative treatment for the management of patients with elective, aseptic causes for a failed knee arthroplasty. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and PsychINFO were searched from inception to 1st December 2020 for studies on patients considering elective, aseptic rKA. Patient-relevant outcomes (PROs) were defined as implant survivorship, joint function, quality of life (QoL), complications and hospital admission impact. RESULTS: No studies compared elective, aseptic rKA to non-operative management. Forty uncontrolled studies reported on PROs following elective, aseptic rKA (434434 rKA). Pooled estimates for implant survivorship were: 95.5% (95% CI 93.2–97.7%) at 1 year [seven studies (5524 rKA)], 90.8% (95% CI 87.6–94.0%) at 5 years [13 studies (5754 rKA)], 87.4% (95% CI 81.7–93.1%) at 10 years [nine studies (2188 rKA)], and 83.2% (95% CI 76.7–89.7%) at 15 years [two studies (452 rKA)]. Twelve studies (2382 rKA) reported joint function and/or QoL: all found large improvements from baseline to follow-up. Mortality rates were low (0.16% to 2% within 1 year) [four studies (353064 rKA)]. Post-operative complications were common (9.1 to 37.2% at 90 days). CONCLUSION: Higher-quality evidence is needed to support patients with decision-making in elective, aseptic rKA. This should include studies comparing operative and non-operative management. Implant survivorship following elective, aseptic rKA was ~ 96% at 1 year, ~ 91% at 5 years and ~ 87% at 10 years. Early complications were common after elective, aseptic rKA and the rates summarised here can be shared with patients during informed consent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020196922 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02290-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10394899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103948992023-08-03 Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review Sabah, Shiraz A. Hedge, Elizabeth A. von Fritsch, Lennart Xu, Joshua Rajasekaran, Raja Bhaskara Hamilton, Thomas W. Shearman, Alexander D. Alvand, Abtin Beard, David J. Hopewell, Sally Price, Andrew J. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of revision knee arthroplasty (rKA) compared to non-operative treatment for the management of patients with elective, aseptic causes for a failed knee arthroplasty. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and PsychINFO were searched from inception to 1st December 2020 for studies on patients considering elective, aseptic rKA. Patient-relevant outcomes (PROs) were defined as implant survivorship, joint function, quality of life (QoL), complications and hospital admission impact. RESULTS: No studies compared elective, aseptic rKA to non-operative management. Forty uncontrolled studies reported on PROs following elective, aseptic rKA (434434 rKA). Pooled estimates for implant survivorship were: 95.5% (95% CI 93.2–97.7%) at 1 year [seven studies (5524 rKA)], 90.8% (95% CI 87.6–94.0%) at 5 years [13 studies (5754 rKA)], 87.4% (95% CI 81.7–93.1%) at 10 years [nine studies (2188 rKA)], and 83.2% (95% CI 76.7–89.7%) at 15 years [two studies (452 rKA)]. Twelve studies (2382 rKA) reported joint function and/or QoL: all found large improvements from baseline to follow-up. Mortality rates were low (0.16% to 2% within 1 year) [four studies (353064 rKA)]. Post-operative complications were common (9.1 to 37.2% at 90 days). CONCLUSION: Higher-quality evidence is needed to support patients with decision-making in elective, aseptic rKA. This should include studies comparing operative and non-operative management. Implant survivorship following elective, aseptic rKA was ~ 96% at 1 year, ~ 91% at 5 years and ~ 87% at 10 years. Early complications were common after elective, aseptic rKA and the rates summarised here can be shared with patients during informed consent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020196922 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02290-6. BioMed Central 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10394899/ /pubmed/37528486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02290-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sabah, Shiraz A.
Hedge, Elizabeth A.
von Fritsch, Lennart
Xu, Joshua
Rajasekaran, Raja Bhaskara
Hamilton, Thomas W.
Shearman, Alexander D.
Alvand, Abtin
Beard, David J.
Hopewell, Sally
Price, Andrew J.
Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
title Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
title_full Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
title_fullStr Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
title_short Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
title_sort patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10394899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02290-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sabahshiraza patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT hedgeelizabetha patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT vonfritschlennart patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT xujoshua patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT rajasekaranrajabhaskara patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT hamiltonthomasw patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT shearmanalexanderd patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT alvandabtin patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT bearddavidj patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT hopewellsally patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT priceandrewj patientrelevantoutcomesfollowingelectiveasepticrevisionkneearthroplastyasystematicreview