Improving clinical trial recruitment with warm transfers

During recruitment for a large, decentralized clinical trial for high-risk individuals with COVID-19, respondents were either transferred in real-time to a clinical research coordinator (i.e. warm transfer), or a callback time was arranged. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 2341 respondents...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peer, Kyle, Cotliar, Jonathan, Goulian, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Brief Communication
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231191315
_version_ 1785083530375593984
author Peer, Kyle
Cotliar, Jonathan
Goulian, Andrew
author_facet Peer, Kyle
Cotliar, Jonathan
Goulian, Andrew
author_sort Peer, Kyle
collection PubMed
description During recruitment for a large, decentralized clinical trial for high-risk individuals with COVID-19, respondents were either transferred in real-time to a clinical research coordinator (i.e. warm transfer), or a callback time was arranged. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 2341 respondents comparing the rate of enrollment among those who were warm-transferred and those for whom a callback was arranged. A respondent who warm-transferred was significantly more likely to enroll in the clinical trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10395154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103951542023-08-03 Improving clinical trial recruitment with warm transfers Peer, Kyle Cotliar, Jonathan Goulian, Andrew Digit Health Brief Communication During recruitment for a large, decentralized clinical trial for high-risk individuals with COVID-19, respondents were either transferred in real-time to a clinical research coordinator (i.e. warm transfer), or a callback time was arranged. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 2341 respondents comparing the rate of enrollment among those who were warm-transferred and those for whom a callback was arranged. A respondent who warm-transferred was significantly more likely to enroll in the clinical trial. SAGE Publications 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10395154/ /pubmed/37538384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231191315 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Peer, Kyle
Cotliar, Jonathan
Goulian, Andrew
Improving clinical trial recruitment with warm transfers
title Improving clinical trial recruitment with warm transfers
title_full Improving clinical trial recruitment with warm transfers
title_fullStr Improving clinical trial recruitment with warm transfers
title_full_unstemmed Improving clinical trial recruitment with warm transfers
title_short Improving clinical trial recruitment with warm transfers
title_sort improving clinical trial recruitment with warm transfers
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231191315
work_keys_str_mv AT peerkyle improvingclinicaltrialrecruitmentwithwarmtransfers
AT cotliarjonathan improvingclinicaltrialrecruitmentwithwarmtransfers
AT goulianandrew improvingclinicaltrialrecruitmentwithwarmtransfers

Ejemplares similares