Cargando…
How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I
During the first World War (1914-1918), the British Army found itself confronting enemy armies in several countries in which malaria potentially hampered its ability to engage with the enemy. This article contrasts how it dealt with malaria on two of these fronts, the Macedonia front and the Palesti...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dutch Malaria Foundation
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538369 http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8203655 |
_version_ | 1785083570396594176 |
---|---|
author | Alexander, Anton |
author_facet | Alexander, Anton |
author_sort | Alexander, Anton |
collection | PubMed |
description | During the first World War (1914-1918), the British Army found itself confronting enemy armies in several countries in which malaria potentially hampered its ability to engage with the enemy. This article contrasts how it dealt with malaria on two of these fronts, the Macedonia front and the Palestine front. One front resulted in a failure of the Army to protect itself against the disease, with the other front resulting in successful protection of its troops, enabling those troops to create a decisive victory. The paper briefly explains the major differences between the two fronts, including the different attempts to deal with the disease, and draws lessons for contemporary malaria elimination efforts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10395414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dutch Malaria Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103954142023-08-03 How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I Alexander, Anton Malariaworld J Opinion Article During the first World War (1914-1918), the British Army found itself confronting enemy armies in several countries in which malaria potentially hampered its ability to engage with the enemy. This article contrasts how it dealt with malaria on two of these fronts, the Macedonia front and the Palestine front. One front resulted in a failure of the Army to protect itself against the disease, with the other front resulting in successful protection of its troops, enabling those troops to create a decisive victory. The paper briefly explains the major differences between the two fronts, including the different attempts to deal with the disease, and draws lessons for contemporary malaria elimination efforts. Dutch Malaria Foundation 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10395414/ /pubmed/37538369 http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8203655 Text en Copyright © 2023 Alexander https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Article Alexander, Anton How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I |
title | How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I |
title_full | How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I |
title_fullStr | How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I |
title_full_unstemmed | How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I |
title_short | How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I |
title_sort | how malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the british army during world war i |
topic | Opinion Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538369 http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8203655 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexanderanton howmalariawasweaponisedbythebritisharmyduringworldwari |