Cargando…

How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I

During the first World War (1914-1918), the British Army found itself confronting enemy armies in several countries in which malaria potentially hampered its ability to engage with the enemy. This article contrasts how it dealt with malaria on two of these fronts, the Macedonia front and the Palesti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Alexander, Anton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dutch Malaria Foundation 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538369
http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8203655
_version_ 1785083570396594176
author Alexander, Anton
author_facet Alexander, Anton
author_sort Alexander, Anton
collection PubMed
description During the first World War (1914-1918), the British Army found itself confronting enemy armies in several countries in which malaria potentially hampered its ability to engage with the enemy. This article contrasts how it dealt with malaria on two of these fronts, the Macedonia front and the Palestine front. One front resulted in a failure of the Army to protect itself against the disease, with the other front resulting in successful protection of its troops, enabling those troops to create a decisive victory. The paper briefly explains the major differences between the two fronts, including the different attempts to deal with the disease, and draws lessons for contemporary malaria elimination efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10395414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dutch Malaria Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103954142023-08-03 How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I Alexander, Anton Malariaworld J Opinion Article During the first World War (1914-1918), the British Army found itself confronting enemy armies in several countries in which malaria potentially hampered its ability to engage with the enemy. This article contrasts how it dealt with malaria on two of these fronts, the Macedonia front and the Palestine front. One front resulted in a failure of the Army to protect itself against the disease, with the other front resulting in successful protection of its troops, enabling those troops to create a decisive victory. The paper briefly explains the major differences between the two fronts, including the different attempts to deal with the disease, and draws lessons for contemporary malaria elimination efforts. Dutch Malaria Foundation 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10395414/ /pubmed/37538369 http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8203655 Text en Copyright © 2023 Alexander https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Opinion Article
Alexander, Anton
How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I
title How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I
title_full How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I
title_fullStr How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I
title_full_unstemmed How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I
title_short How malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the British Army during World War I
title_sort how malaria was ‘weaponised’ by the british army during world war i
topic Opinion Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538369
http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8203655
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderanton howmalariawasweaponisedbythebritisharmyduringworldwari