Cargando…

P12 Assessing the clinical utility of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in India: findings from a questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND: We aimed to formulate a consensus for the therapeutic utilization of antibiotics based on contemporary evidence and the real-world experiences of the clinicians at the forefront of the care of patients with urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: We developed customized technological res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Narmada Prasad, Chibber, Percy, Oza, Umesh, Kumar, Anant, Ramesh, D, Pandey, Sanjay, Mallikarjuna Reddy, N, Kundu, Bibash, Taneja, Rajesh, Kamath, Ganesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395426/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad077.016
_version_ 1785083573387132928
author Gupta, Narmada Prasad
Chibber, Percy
Oza, Umesh
Kumar, Anant
Ramesh, D
Pandey, Sanjay
Mallikarjuna Reddy, N
Kundu, Bibash
Taneja, Rajesh
Kamath, Ganesh
author_facet Gupta, Narmada Prasad
Chibber, Percy
Oza, Umesh
Kumar, Anant
Ramesh, D
Pandey, Sanjay
Mallikarjuna Reddy, N
Kundu, Bibash
Taneja, Rajesh
Kamath, Ganesh
author_sort Gupta, Narmada Prasad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to formulate a consensus for the therapeutic utilization of antibiotics based on contemporary evidence and the real-world experiences of the clinicians at the forefront of the care of patients with urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: We developed customized technological response system for mapping exercise and panel of eminent specialists was convened. Prior consent was obtained, and the weblink of the questionnaire was provided. Sub-expert nationwide panel (n=397), across India (PRISM Survey group), rated their level of agreement with 11 questions with each item on a five-point Likert scale and 5 objective response questions. The consensus was pre-defined if the weighted mean score for the Likert scale was >100. Data were statistically analysed by GraphPad software version 9.5.0. RESULTS: The mean years of experience were 9.2 years (SD ±10, 95% CI 8.2–10), and cumulative clinical experience was 3669 person-years. The predominant clinical practice setting of the respondents was a public hospital (58.6%). The highest agreement score in the decreasing rank order (of adjusted weighted mean score) for UTI were: antibiotic resistance is a major challenge (126.1), oral fosfomycin-based regimens are effective against MDR pathogens (123.4), is a good option for bacterial biofilm reduction (121.7), the potential to manage recurrent lower UTI (121.6), oral fosfomycin along with nitrofurantoin is been useful to manage MDR UTI (106.8), nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin are chosen as empirical treatment (103.7), fosfomycin has stood the test of time (120.2). Adjusted mean response scores (±SD, 95% CI) for consensus were: agree (73±9.4, 95% CI 66 to 79) followed by strongly agree (32±13, 95% CI 24 to 41), neither agree nor disagree (13±4.9, 95% CI 9.8 to 16), disagree (−6.5±4.7, 95% CI −9.7 to −3.4), strongly disagree (−0.86±0.9, 95% CI −1.5 to −0.26). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of MDR UTI, time-tested oral fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin can improve management of UTI without increasing the complexity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10395426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103954262023-08-03 P12 Assessing the clinical utility of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in India: findings from a questionnaire survey Gupta, Narmada Prasad Chibber, Percy Oza, Umesh Kumar, Anant Ramesh, D Pandey, Sanjay Mallikarjuna Reddy, N Kundu, Bibash Taneja, Rajesh Kamath, Ganesh JAC Antimicrob Resist Abstracts BACKGROUND: We aimed to formulate a consensus for the therapeutic utilization of antibiotics based on contemporary evidence and the real-world experiences of the clinicians at the forefront of the care of patients with urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: We developed customized technological response system for mapping exercise and panel of eminent specialists was convened. Prior consent was obtained, and the weblink of the questionnaire was provided. Sub-expert nationwide panel (n=397), across India (PRISM Survey group), rated their level of agreement with 11 questions with each item on a five-point Likert scale and 5 objective response questions. The consensus was pre-defined if the weighted mean score for the Likert scale was >100. Data were statistically analysed by GraphPad software version 9.5.0. RESULTS: The mean years of experience were 9.2 years (SD ±10, 95% CI 8.2–10), and cumulative clinical experience was 3669 person-years. The predominant clinical practice setting of the respondents was a public hospital (58.6%). The highest agreement score in the decreasing rank order (of adjusted weighted mean score) for UTI were: antibiotic resistance is a major challenge (126.1), oral fosfomycin-based regimens are effective against MDR pathogens (123.4), is a good option for bacterial biofilm reduction (121.7), the potential to manage recurrent lower UTI (121.6), oral fosfomycin along with nitrofurantoin is been useful to manage MDR UTI (106.8), nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin are chosen as empirical treatment (103.7), fosfomycin has stood the test of time (120.2). Adjusted mean response scores (±SD, 95% CI) for consensus were: agree (73±9.4, 95% CI 66 to 79) followed by strongly agree (32±13, 95% CI 24 to 41), neither agree nor disagree (13±4.9, 95% CI 9.8 to 16), disagree (−6.5±4.7, 95% CI −9.7 to −3.4), strongly disagree (−0.86±0.9, 95% CI −1.5 to −0.26). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of MDR UTI, time-tested oral fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin can improve management of UTI without increasing the complexity. Oxford University Press 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10395426/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad077.016 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Gupta, Narmada Prasad
Chibber, Percy
Oza, Umesh
Kumar, Anant
Ramesh, D
Pandey, Sanjay
Mallikarjuna Reddy, N
Kundu, Bibash
Taneja, Rajesh
Kamath, Ganesh
P12 Assessing the clinical utility of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in India: findings from a questionnaire survey
title P12 Assessing the clinical utility of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in India: findings from a questionnaire survey
title_full P12 Assessing the clinical utility of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in India: findings from a questionnaire survey
title_fullStr P12 Assessing the clinical utility of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in India: findings from a questionnaire survey
title_full_unstemmed P12 Assessing the clinical utility of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in India: findings from a questionnaire survey
title_short P12 Assessing the clinical utility of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in India: findings from a questionnaire survey
title_sort p12 assessing the clinical utility of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in india: findings from a questionnaire survey
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395426/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad077.016
work_keys_str_mv AT guptanarmadaprasad p12assessingtheclinicalutilityofantibioticsforurinarytractinfectionsinindiafindingsfromaquestionnairesurvey
AT chibberpercy p12assessingtheclinicalutilityofantibioticsforurinarytractinfectionsinindiafindingsfromaquestionnairesurvey
AT ozaumesh p12assessingtheclinicalutilityofantibioticsforurinarytractinfectionsinindiafindingsfromaquestionnairesurvey
AT kumaranant p12assessingtheclinicalutilityofantibioticsforurinarytractinfectionsinindiafindingsfromaquestionnairesurvey
AT rameshd p12assessingtheclinicalutilityofantibioticsforurinarytractinfectionsinindiafindingsfromaquestionnairesurvey
AT pandeysanjay p12assessingtheclinicalutilityofantibioticsforurinarytractinfectionsinindiafindingsfromaquestionnairesurvey
AT mallikarjunareddyn p12assessingtheclinicalutilityofantibioticsforurinarytractinfectionsinindiafindingsfromaquestionnairesurvey
AT kundubibash p12assessingtheclinicalutilityofantibioticsforurinarytractinfectionsinindiafindingsfromaquestionnairesurvey
AT tanejarajesh p12assessingtheclinicalutilityofantibioticsforurinarytractinfectionsinindiafindingsfromaquestionnairesurvey
AT kamathganesh p12assessingtheclinicalutilityofantibioticsforurinarytractinfectionsinindiafindingsfromaquestionnairesurvey