Cargando…

Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used as a treatment for actinic keratoses (AK), with new sunlight‐based regimens proposed as alternatives to lamp‐based treatments. Prescribing indoor daylight activation could help address the seasonal temperature, clinical supervision, and access va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruiz, Alberto J., LaRochelle, Ethan P. M., Fahrner, Marie‐Christine P., Emond, Jennifer A., Samkoe, Kimberley S., Pogue, Brian W., Chapman, M. Shane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.226
_version_ 1785083616086196224
author Ruiz, Alberto J.
LaRochelle, Ethan P. M.
Fahrner, Marie‐Christine P.
Emond, Jennifer A.
Samkoe, Kimberley S.
Pogue, Brian W.
Chapman, M. Shane
author_facet Ruiz, Alberto J.
LaRochelle, Ethan P. M.
Fahrner, Marie‐Christine P.
Emond, Jennifer A.
Samkoe, Kimberley S.
Pogue, Brian W.
Chapman, M. Shane
author_sort Ruiz, Alberto J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used as a treatment for actinic keratoses (AK), with new sunlight‐based regimens proposed as alternatives to lamp‐based treatments. Prescribing indoor daylight activation could help address the seasonal temperature, clinical supervision, and access variability associated with outdoor treatments. OBJECTIVE: To compare the AK lesion clearance efficacy of indoor daylight PDT treatment (30 min of 5‐aminolevulinic acid (ALA) pre‐incubation, followed by 2 h of indoor sunlight) versus a lamp‐based PDT treatment (30 min of ALA preincubation, followed by 10 min of red light). METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 41 patients. Topical 10% ALA was applied to the entire treatment site (face, forehead, scalp). Patients were assigned to either the lamp‐based or indoor daylight treatment. Actinic keratosis lesion counts were determined by clinical examination and recorded for pre‐treatment, 1‐month, and 6‐month follow‐up visits. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the efficacy of AK lesion clearance between the red‐lamp (1‐month clearance = 57 ± 17%, 6‐month clearance = 57 ± 20%) and indoor daylight treatment (1‐month clearance = 61 ± 19%, 6‐month clearance = 67 ± 20%). A 95% confidence interval of the difference of the means was measured between −4.4% and 13.4% for 1‐month, and −2.2% and +23.6% for 6‐month timepoints when comparing the indoor daylight to the red‐lamp treatment, with a priori interval of equivalence of ±20%. LIMITATIONS: Ensuring an equivalent dose between the indoor and lamp treatment cohorts limited randomisation since it required performing indoor daylight treatments only during sunny days. CONCLUSION: Indoor‐daylight PDT provided equivalent AK treatment efficacy to a lamp‐based regimen while overcoming temperature limitations and UV‐block sunscreen issues associated with outdoor sunlight treatments in the winter. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov listing: NCT03805737.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10395623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103956232023-08-03 Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis Ruiz, Alberto J. LaRochelle, Ethan P. M. Fahrner, Marie‐Christine P. Emond, Jennifer A. Samkoe, Kimberley S. Pogue, Brian W. Chapman, M. Shane Skin Health Dis Original Articles BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used as a treatment for actinic keratoses (AK), with new sunlight‐based regimens proposed as alternatives to lamp‐based treatments. Prescribing indoor daylight activation could help address the seasonal temperature, clinical supervision, and access variability associated with outdoor treatments. OBJECTIVE: To compare the AK lesion clearance efficacy of indoor daylight PDT treatment (30 min of 5‐aminolevulinic acid (ALA) pre‐incubation, followed by 2 h of indoor sunlight) versus a lamp‐based PDT treatment (30 min of ALA preincubation, followed by 10 min of red light). METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 41 patients. Topical 10% ALA was applied to the entire treatment site (face, forehead, scalp). Patients were assigned to either the lamp‐based or indoor daylight treatment. Actinic keratosis lesion counts were determined by clinical examination and recorded for pre‐treatment, 1‐month, and 6‐month follow‐up visits. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the efficacy of AK lesion clearance between the red‐lamp (1‐month clearance = 57 ± 17%, 6‐month clearance = 57 ± 20%) and indoor daylight treatment (1‐month clearance = 61 ± 19%, 6‐month clearance = 67 ± 20%). A 95% confidence interval of the difference of the means was measured between −4.4% and 13.4% for 1‐month, and −2.2% and +23.6% for 6‐month timepoints when comparing the indoor daylight to the red‐lamp treatment, with a priori interval of equivalence of ±20%. LIMITATIONS: Ensuring an equivalent dose between the indoor and lamp treatment cohorts limited randomisation since it required performing indoor daylight treatments only during sunny days. CONCLUSION: Indoor‐daylight PDT provided equivalent AK treatment efficacy to a lamp‐based regimen while overcoming temperature limitations and UV‐block sunscreen issues associated with outdoor sunlight treatments in the winter. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov listing: NCT03805737. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10395623/ /pubmed/37538332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.226 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ruiz, Alberto J.
LaRochelle, Ethan P. M.
Fahrner, Marie‐Christine P.
Emond, Jennifer A.
Samkoe, Kimberley S.
Pogue, Brian W.
Chapman, M. Shane
Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis
title Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis
title_full Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis
title_fullStr Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis
title_full_unstemmed Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis
title_short Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis
title_sort equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.226
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizalbertoj equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT larochelleethanpm equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT fahrnermariechristinep equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT emondjennifera equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT samkoekimberleys equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT poguebrianw equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis
AT chapmanmshane equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis