Cargando…
Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis
BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used as a treatment for actinic keratoses (AK), with new sunlight‐based regimens proposed as alternatives to lamp‐based treatments. Prescribing indoor daylight activation could help address the seasonal temperature, clinical supervision, and access va...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.226 |
_version_ | 1785083616086196224 |
---|---|
author | Ruiz, Alberto J. LaRochelle, Ethan P. M. Fahrner, Marie‐Christine P. Emond, Jennifer A. Samkoe, Kimberley S. Pogue, Brian W. Chapman, M. Shane |
author_facet | Ruiz, Alberto J. LaRochelle, Ethan P. M. Fahrner, Marie‐Christine P. Emond, Jennifer A. Samkoe, Kimberley S. Pogue, Brian W. Chapman, M. Shane |
author_sort | Ruiz, Alberto J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used as a treatment for actinic keratoses (AK), with new sunlight‐based regimens proposed as alternatives to lamp‐based treatments. Prescribing indoor daylight activation could help address the seasonal temperature, clinical supervision, and access variability associated with outdoor treatments. OBJECTIVE: To compare the AK lesion clearance efficacy of indoor daylight PDT treatment (30 min of 5‐aminolevulinic acid (ALA) pre‐incubation, followed by 2 h of indoor sunlight) versus a lamp‐based PDT treatment (30 min of ALA preincubation, followed by 10 min of red light). METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 41 patients. Topical 10% ALA was applied to the entire treatment site (face, forehead, scalp). Patients were assigned to either the lamp‐based or indoor daylight treatment. Actinic keratosis lesion counts were determined by clinical examination and recorded for pre‐treatment, 1‐month, and 6‐month follow‐up visits. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the efficacy of AK lesion clearance between the red‐lamp (1‐month clearance = 57 ± 17%, 6‐month clearance = 57 ± 20%) and indoor daylight treatment (1‐month clearance = 61 ± 19%, 6‐month clearance = 67 ± 20%). A 95% confidence interval of the difference of the means was measured between −4.4% and 13.4% for 1‐month, and −2.2% and +23.6% for 6‐month timepoints when comparing the indoor daylight to the red‐lamp treatment, with a priori interval of equivalence of ±20%. LIMITATIONS: Ensuring an equivalent dose between the indoor and lamp treatment cohorts limited randomisation since it required performing indoor daylight treatments only during sunny days. CONCLUSION: Indoor‐daylight PDT provided equivalent AK treatment efficacy to a lamp‐based regimen while overcoming temperature limitations and UV‐block sunscreen issues associated with outdoor sunlight treatments in the winter. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov listing: NCT03805737. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10395623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103956232023-08-03 Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis Ruiz, Alberto J. LaRochelle, Ethan P. M. Fahrner, Marie‐Christine P. Emond, Jennifer A. Samkoe, Kimberley S. Pogue, Brian W. Chapman, M. Shane Skin Health Dis Original Articles BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used as a treatment for actinic keratoses (AK), with new sunlight‐based regimens proposed as alternatives to lamp‐based treatments. Prescribing indoor daylight activation could help address the seasonal temperature, clinical supervision, and access variability associated with outdoor treatments. OBJECTIVE: To compare the AK lesion clearance efficacy of indoor daylight PDT treatment (30 min of 5‐aminolevulinic acid (ALA) pre‐incubation, followed by 2 h of indoor sunlight) versus a lamp‐based PDT treatment (30 min of ALA preincubation, followed by 10 min of red light). METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 41 patients. Topical 10% ALA was applied to the entire treatment site (face, forehead, scalp). Patients were assigned to either the lamp‐based or indoor daylight treatment. Actinic keratosis lesion counts were determined by clinical examination and recorded for pre‐treatment, 1‐month, and 6‐month follow‐up visits. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the efficacy of AK lesion clearance between the red‐lamp (1‐month clearance = 57 ± 17%, 6‐month clearance = 57 ± 20%) and indoor daylight treatment (1‐month clearance = 61 ± 19%, 6‐month clearance = 67 ± 20%). A 95% confidence interval of the difference of the means was measured between −4.4% and 13.4% for 1‐month, and −2.2% and +23.6% for 6‐month timepoints when comparing the indoor daylight to the red‐lamp treatment, with a priori interval of equivalence of ±20%. LIMITATIONS: Ensuring an equivalent dose between the indoor and lamp treatment cohorts limited randomisation since it required performing indoor daylight treatments only during sunny days. CONCLUSION: Indoor‐daylight PDT provided equivalent AK treatment efficacy to a lamp‐based regimen while overcoming temperature limitations and UV‐block sunscreen issues associated with outdoor sunlight treatments in the winter. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov listing: NCT03805737. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10395623/ /pubmed/37538332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.226 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ruiz, Alberto J. LaRochelle, Ethan P. M. Fahrner, Marie‐Christine P. Emond, Jennifer A. Samkoe, Kimberley S. Pogue, Brian W. Chapman, M. Shane Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis |
title | Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis |
title_full | Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis |
title_fullStr | Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis |
title_short | Equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis |
title_sort | equivalent efficacy of indoor daylight and lamp‐based 5‐aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruizalbertoj equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis AT larochelleethanpm equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis AT fahrnermariechristinep equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis AT emondjennifera equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis AT samkoekimberleys equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis AT poguebrianw equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis AT chapmanmshane equivalentefficacyofindoordaylightandlampbased5aminolevulinicacidphotodynamictherapyfortreatmentofactinickeratosis |