Cargando…
The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus
BACKGROUND: The lupus band test (LBT) is a direct immunofluorescence (DIF) technique which shows a band of localised immunoglobulins at the dermo‐epidermal junction in lesional, non‐sun‐exposed skin of patients with both systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE), and in perilesional skin of pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.205 |
_version_ | 1785083616363020288 |
---|---|
author | Ní Maolcatha, Sarah Nic Dhonncha, Ellis O’Connor, Cathal Dinneen, Sinead Heffron, Cynthia C. B. B. |
author_facet | Ní Maolcatha, Sarah Nic Dhonncha, Ellis O’Connor, Cathal Dinneen, Sinead Heffron, Cynthia C. B. B. |
author_sort | Ní Maolcatha, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The lupus band test (LBT) is a direct immunofluorescence (DIF) technique which shows a band of localised immunoglobulins at the dermo‐epidermal junction in lesional, non‐sun‐exposed skin of patients with both systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE), and in perilesional skin of patients with systemic LE. However, low sensitivity and poor concordance between histological and clinical diagnoses warrant a review of the application of the LBT in the diagnosis of LE. OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the LBT in diagnosing LE following clinico‐pathological correlation (CPC). METHODS: All cases sent to our pathology department between 2011 and 2018 for DIF with a clinical query of LE were reviewed. Data collection included demographic details, pathology requests, histology and DIF reports, clinical reports and diagnoses, and serology. RESULTS: Of 256 histology requests, 9% (n = 23) had a positive LBT. This was discordant with the prevalence of LE diagnosis, as 46.3% were diagnosed with LE following CPC. The sensitivity and specificity of the LBT for LE was 17.6% and 98.8% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 92.9% and negative predictive value of 58.2%. CONCLUSION: The LBT is not a sensitive diagnostic test for LE, but is highly specific, and should be considered as a supportive diagnostic tool for LE. This is the largest reported case series evaluating the efficacy of the LBT in the diagnosis of LE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10395624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103956242023-08-03 The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus Ní Maolcatha, Sarah Nic Dhonncha, Ellis O’Connor, Cathal Dinneen, Sinead Heffron, Cynthia C. B. B. Skin Health Dis Original Articles BACKGROUND: The lupus band test (LBT) is a direct immunofluorescence (DIF) technique which shows a band of localised immunoglobulins at the dermo‐epidermal junction in lesional, non‐sun‐exposed skin of patients with both systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE), and in perilesional skin of patients with systemic LE. However, low sensitivity and poor concordance between histological and clinical diagnoses warrant a review of the application of the LBT in the diagnosis of LE. OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the LBT in diagnosing LE following clinico‐pathological correlation (CPC). METHODS: All cases sent to our pathology department between 2011 and 2018 for DIF with a clinical query of LE were reviewed. Data collection included demographic details, pathology requests, histology and DIF reports, clinical reports and diagnoses, and serology. RESULTS: Of 256 histology requests, 9% (n = 23) had a positive LBT. This was discordant with the prevalence of LE diagnosis, as 46.3% were diagnosed with LE following CPC. The sensitivity and specificity of the LBT for LE was 17.6% and 98.8% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 92.9% and negative predictive value of 58.2%. CONCLUSION: The LBT is not a sensitive diagnostic test for LE, but is highly specific, and should be considered as a supportive diagnostic tool for LE. This is the largest reported case series evaluating the efficacy of the LBT in the diagnosis of LE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10395624/ /pubmed/37538339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.205 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ní Maolcatha, Sarah Nic Dhonncha, Ellis O’Connor, Cathal Dinneen, Sinead Heffron, Cynthia C. B. B. The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus |
title | The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus |
title_full | The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus |
title_fullStr | The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus |
title_full_unstemmed | The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus |
title_short | The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus |
title_sort | lupus band test: a review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nimaolcathasarah thelupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus AT nicdhonnchaellis thelupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus AT oconnorcathal thelupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus AT dinneensinead thelupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus AT heffroncynthiacbb thelupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus AT nimaolcathasarah lupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus AT nicdhonnchaellis lupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus AT oconnorcathal lupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus AT dinneensinead lupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus AT heffroncynthiacbb lupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus |