Cargando…

The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND: The lupus band test (LBT) is a direct immunofluorescence (DIF) technique which shows a band of localised immunoglobulins at the dermo‐epidermal junction in lesional, non‐sun‐exposed skin of patients with both systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE), and in perilesional skin of pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ní Maolcatha, Sarah, Nic Dhonncha, Ellis, O’Connor, Cathal, Dinneen, Sinead, Heffron, Cynthia C. B. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.205
_version_ 1785083616363020288
author Ní Maolcatha, Sarah
Nic Dhonncha, Ellis
O’Connor, Cathal
Dinneen, Sinead
Heffron, Cynthia C. B. B.
author_facet Ní Maolcatha, Sarah
Nic Dhonncha, Ellis
O’Connor, Cathal
Dinneen, Sinead
Heffron, Cynthia C. B. B.
author_sort Ní Maolcatha, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The lupus band test (LBT) is a direct immunofluorescence (DIF) technique which shows a band of localised immunoglobulins at the dermo‐epidermal junction in lesional, non‐sun‐exposed skin of patients with both systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE), and in perilesional skin of patients with systemic LE. However, low sensitivity and poor concordance between histological and clinical diagnoses warrant a review of the application of the LBT in the diagnosis of LE. OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the LBT in diagnosing LE following clinico‐pathological correlation (CPC). METHODS: All cases sent to our pathology department between 2011 and 2018 for DIF with a clinical query of LE were reviewed. Data collection included demographic details, pathology requests, histology and DIF reports, clinical reports and diagnoses, and serology. RESULTS: Of 256 histology requests, 9% (n = 23) had a positive LBT. This was discordant with the prevalence of LE diagnosis, as 46.3% were diagnosed with LE following CPC. The sensitivity and specificity of the LBT for LE was 17.6% and 98.8% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 92.9% and negative predictive value of 58.2%. CONCLUSION: The LBT is not a sensitive diagnostic test for LE, but is highly specific, and should be considered as a supportive diagnostic tool for LE. This is the largest reported case series evaluating the efficacy of the LBT in the diagnosis of LE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10395624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103956242023-08-03 The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus Ní Maolcatha, Sarah Nic Dhonncha, Ellis O’Connor, Cathal Dinneen, Sinead Heffron, Cynthia C. B. B. Skin Health Dis Original Articles BACKGROUND: The lupus band test (LBT) is a direct immunofluorescence (DIF) technique which shows a band of localised immunoglobulins at the dermo‐epidermal junction in lesional, non‐sun‐exposed skin of patients with both systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE), and in perilesional skin of patients with systemic LE. However, low sensitivity and poor concordance between histological and clinical diagnoses warrant a review of the application of the LBT in the diagnosis of LE. OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the LBT in diagnosing LE following clinico‐pathological correlation (CPC). METHODS: All cases sent to our pathology department between 2011 and 2018 for DIF with a clinical query of LE were reviewed. Data collection included demographic details, pathology requests, histology and DIF reports, clinical reports and diagnoses, and serology. RESULTS: Of 256 histology requests, 9% (n = 23) had a positive LBT. This was discordant with the prevalence of LE diagnosis, as 46.3% were diagnosed with LE following CPC. The sensitivity and specificity of the LBT for LE was 17.6% and 98.8% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 92.9% and negative predictive value of 58.2%. CONCLUSION: The LBT is not a sensitive diagnostic test for LE, but is highly specific, and should be considered as a supportive diagnostic tool for LE. This is the largest reported case series evaluating the efficacy of the LBT in the diagnosis of LE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10395624/ /pubmed/37538339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.205 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ní Maolcatha, Sarah
Nic Dhonncha, Ellis
O’Connor, Cathal
Dinneen, Sinead
Heffron, Cynthia C. B. B.
The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus
title The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus
title_full The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus
title_fullStr The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus
title_full_unstemmed The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus
title_short The lupus band test: A review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus
title_sort lupus band test: a review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37538339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.205
work_keys_str_mv AT nimaolcathasarah thelupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus
AT nicdhonnchaellis thelupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus
AT oconnorcathal thelupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus
AT dinneensinead thelupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus
AT heffroncynthiacbb thelupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus
AT nimaolcathasarah lupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus
AT nicdhonnchaellis lupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus
AT oconnorcathal lupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus
AT dinneensinead lupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus
AT heffroncynthiacbb lupusbandtestareviewofthesensitivityandspecificityinthediagnosisoflupuserythematosus