Cargando…
Comparison of anakinra and tocilizumab in management of severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND/AIM: Studies regarding effectiveness of anakinra and tocilizumab treatments in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have contradictory results. Furthermore, there is scarce comparative data regarding superiority of any agent. To further elucidate any superiority between these two agents, w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36422492 http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5487 |
_version_ | 1785083639955980288 |
---|---|
author | KÜÇÜKŞAHİN, Orhan ERDEN, Abdulsamet KARAKAŞ, Özlem GÜVEN, Serdar Can ARMAĞAN, Berkan ŞAHİNER, Enes Seyda İNAN, Osman KURTİPEK, Ali Can GEMCİOĞLU, Emin KARAAHMETOĞLU, Selma TURAN, Sema İZDEŞ, Seval ERDEM, Deniz AYPAK, Adalet AYHAN, Müge AKINCI, Esragül BODUR, Hürrem GÜNER, Rahmet OMMA, Ahmet ATEŞ, İhsan |
author_facet | KÜÇÜKŞAHİN, Orhan ERDEN, Abdulsamet KARAKAŞ, Özlem GÜVEN, Serdar Can ARMAĞAN, Berkan ŞAHİNER, Enes Seyda İNAN, Osman KURTİPEK, Ali Can GEMCİOĞLU, Emin KARAAHMETOĞLU, Selma TURAN, Sema İZDEŞ, Seval ERDEM, Deniz AYPAK, Adalet AYHAN, Müge AKINCI, Esragül BODUR, Hürrem GÜNER, Rahmet OMMA, Ahmet ATEŞ, İhsan |
author_sort | KÜÇÜKŞAHİN, Orhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIM: Studies regarding effectiveness of anakinra and tocilizumab treatments in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have contradictory results. Furthermore, there is scarce comparative data regarding superiority of any agent. To further elucidate any superiority between these two agents, we retrospectively investigated and compared outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients of our inpatient cohort who received anakinra or tocilizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study. Hospitalized patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 who had Brescia-COVID respiratory severity scale score ≥3 and hyperinflammation (defined as elevation of C reactive protein ≥50 g/L or ferritin ≥700 ng/mL) and received anakinra or tocilizumab in addition to standard care were enrolled in the study. Length of hospital stay after initiation of antiinflammatory treatment, need for mechanical ventilation, need for intensive care unit admission, mortality were set as primary outcomes and compared between tocilizumab and anakinra recipients after propensity score matching. RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were placed in each group after propensity score matching. In the anakinra group, relative risk reduction for intensive care unit admission was 50% when compared to the tocilizumab group and the number needed to treat to avert an intensive care unit admission was 3 (95% CI, 2–5). In terms of mortality, a 52% relative risk reduction was observed with anakinra treatment and the number needed to treat to avert an intensive care unit admission was 8 (95% CI, 4–50). Significantly more patients were observed to receive glucocorticoids in the anakinra group. CONCLUSION: Anakinra administration in severe COVID-19 patients was significantly associated with better survival and greater clinical improvement compared to the tocilizumab administration in our study. Increased rate of glucocorticoid use in the anakinra group might have contributed to better outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10395730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103957302023-08-03 Comparison of anakinra and tocilizumab in management of severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study KÜÇÜKŞAHİN, Orhan ERDEN, Abdulsamet KARAKAŞ, Özlem GÜVEN, Serdar Can ARMAĞAN, Berkan ŞAHİNER, Enes Seyda İNAN, Osman KURTİPEK, Ali Can GEMCİOĞLU, Emin KARAAHMETOĞLU, Selma TURAN, Sema İZDEŞ, Seval ERDEM, Deniz AYPAK, Adalet AYHAN, Müge AKINCI, Esragül BODUR, Hürrem GÜNER, Rahmet OMMA, Ahmet ATEŞ, İhsan Turk J Med Sci Research Article BACKGROUND/AIM: Studies regarding effectiveness of anakinra and tocilizumab treatments in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have contradictory results. Furthermore, there is scarce comparative data regarding superiority of any agent. To further elucidate any superiority between these two agents, we retrospectively investigated and compared outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients of our inpatient cohort who received anakinra or tocilizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study. Hospitalized patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 who had Brescia-COVID respiratory severity scale score ≥3 and hyperinflammation (defined as elevation of C reactive protein ≥50 g/L or ferritin ≥700 ng/mL) and received anakinra or tocilizumab in addition to standard care were enrolled in the study. Length of hospital stay after initiation of antiinflammatory treatment, need for mechanical ventilation, need for intensive care unit admission, mortality were set as primary outcomes and compared between tocilizumab and anakinra recipients after propensity score matching. RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were placed in each group after propensity score matching. In the anakinra group, relative risk reduction for intensive care unit admission was 50% when compared to the tocilizumab group and the number needed to treat to avert an intensive care unit admission was 3 (95% CI, 2–5). In terms of mortality, a 52% relative risk reduction was observed with anakinra treatment and the number needed to treat to avert an intensive care unit admission was 8 (95% CI, 4–50). Significantly more patients were observed to receive glucocorticoids in the anakinra group. CONCLUSION: Anakinra administration in severe COVID-19 patients was significantly associated with better survival and greater clinical improvement compared to the tocilizumab administration in our study. Increased rate of glucocorticoid use in the anakinra group might have contributed to better outcomes. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) 2022-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10395730/ /pubmed/36422492 http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5487 Text en © TÜBİTAK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article KÜÇÜKŞAHİN, Orhan ERDEN, Abdulsamet KARAKAŞ, Özlem GÜVEN, Serdar Can ARMAĞAN, Berkan ŞAHİNER, Enes Seyda İNAN, Osman KURTİPEK, Ali Can GEMCİOĞLU, Emin KARAAHMETOĞLU, Selma TURAN, Sema İZDEŞ, Seval ERDEM, Deniz AYPAK, Adalet AYHAN, Müge AKINCI, Esragül BODUR, Hürrem GÜNER, Rahmet OMMA, Ahmet ATEŞ, İhsan Comparison of anakinra and tocilizumab in management of severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Comparison of anakinra and tocilizumab in management of severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Comparison of anakinra and tocilizumab in management of severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of anakinra and tocilizumab in management of severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of anakinra and tocilizumab in management of severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Comparison of anakinra and tocilizumab in management of severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | comparison of anakinra and tocilizumab in management of severe covid-19: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36422492 http://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kucuksahinorhan comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT erdenabdulsamet comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT karakasozlem comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT guvenserdarcan comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT armaganberkan comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT sahinerenesseyda comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT inanosman comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT kurtipekalican comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT gemciogluemin comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT karaahmetogluselma comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT turansema comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT izdesseval comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT erdemdeniz comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT aypakadalet comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT ayhanmuge comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT akinciesragul comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT bodurhurrem comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT gunerrahmet comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT ommaahmet comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy AT atesihsan comparisonofanakinraandtocilizumabinmanagementofseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy |