Cargando…

Scientists’ deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation

This paper investigates the relationship between scientists’ communication experience and attitudes towards misinformation and their intention to correct misinformation. Specifically, the study focuses on two correction strategies: source-based correction and relational approaches. Source-based appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Sera, Anderson, Ashley A., Cagle, Shelby, Long, Marilee, Kelp, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37531388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287870
_version_ 1785083680490782720
author Choi, Sera
Anderson, Ashley A.
Cagle, Shelby
Long, Marilee
Kelp, Nicole
author_facet Choi, Sera
Anderson, Ashley A.
Cagle, Shelby
Long, Marilee
Kelp, Nicole
author_sort Choi, Sera
collection PubMed
description This paper investigates the relationship between scientists’ communication experience and attitudes towards misinformation and their intention to correct misinformation. Specifically, the study focuses on two correction strategies: source-based correction and relational approaches. Source-based approaches combatting misinformation prioritize sharing accurate information from trustworthy sources to encourage audiences to trust reliable information over false information. On the other hand, relational approaches give priority to developing relationships or promoting dialogue as a means of addressing misinformation. In this study, we surveyed 416 scientists from U.S. land-grant universities using a self-report questionnaire. We find that scientists’ engagement in science communication activities is positively related to their intention to correct misinformation using both strategies. Moreover, the scientists’ attitude towards misinformation mediates the relationship between engagement in communication activities and intention to correct misinformation. The study also finds that the deficit model perception–that is, the assumption that scientists only need to transmit scientific knowledge to an ignorant public in order to increase understanding and support for science–moderates the indirect effect of engagement in science communication activities on behavioral intention to correct misinformation using relational strategies through attitude towards misinformation. Thus, the deficit model perception is a barrier to engaging in relational strategies to correct misinformation. We suggest that addressing the deficit model perception and providing science communication training that promotes inclusive worldviews and relational approaches would increase scientists’ behavioral intentions to address misinformation. The study concludes that scientists should recognize their dual positionality as scientists and members of their community and engage in respectful conversations with community members about science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10395896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103958962023-08-03 Scientists’ deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation Choi, Sera Anderson, Ashley A. Cagle, Shelby Long, Marilee Kelp, Nicole PLoS One Research Article This paper investigates the relationship between scientists’ communication experience and attitudes towards misinformation and their intention to correct misinformation. Specifically, the study focuses on two correction strategies: source-based correction and relational approaches. Source-based approaches combatting misinformation prioritize sharing accurate information from trustworthy sources to encourage audiences to trust reliable information over false information. On the other hand, relational approaches give priority to developing relationships or promoting dialogue as a means of addressing misinformation. In this study, we surveyed 416 scientists from U.S. land-grant universities using a self-report questionnaire. We find that scientists’ engagement in science communication activities is positively related to their intention to correct misinformation using both strategies. Moreover, the scientists’ attitude towards misinformation mediates the relationship between engagement in communication activities and intention to correct misinformation. The study also finds that the deficit model perception–that is, the assumption that scientists only need to transmit scientific knowledge to an ignorant public in order to increase understanding and support for science–moderates the indirect effect of engagement in science communication activities on behavioral intention to correct misinformation using relational strategies through attitude towards misinformation. Thus, the deficit model perception is a barrier to engaging in relational strategies to correct misinformation. We suggest that addressing the deficit model perception and providing science communication training that promotes inclusive worldviews and relational approaches would increase scientists’ behavioral intentions to address misinformation. The study concludes that scientists should recognize their dual positionality as scientists and members of their community and engage in respectful conversations with community members about science. Public Library of Science 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10395896/ /pubmed/37531388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287870 Text en © 2023 Choi et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Choi, Sera
Anderson, Ashley A.
Cagle, Shelby
Long, Marilee
Kelp, Nicole
Scientists’ deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation
title Scientists’ deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation
title_full Scientists’ deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation
title_fullStr Scientists’ deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation
title_full_unstemmed Scientists’ deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation
title_short Scientists’ deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation
title_sort scientists’ deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37531388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287870
work_keys_str_mv AT choisera scientistsdeficitperceptionofthepublicimpedestheirbehavioralintentionstocorrectmisinformation
AT andersonashleya scientistsdeficitperceptionofthepublicimpedestheirbehavioralintentionstocorrectmisinformation
AT cagleshelby scientistsdeficitperceptionofthepublicimpedestheirbehavioralintentionstocorrectmisinformation
AT longmarilee scientistsdeficitperceptionofthepublicimpedestheirbehavioralintentionstocorrectmisinformation
AT kelpnicole scientistsdeficitperceptionofthepublicimpedestheirbehavioralintentionstocorrectmisinformation