Cargando…

Costo-efectividad del tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en México

BACKGROUND: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2) is a public health and socioeconomic problem, generating direct medical costs for its treatment. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of monotherapy and bitherapy treatments in patients with DM2. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness, observational, ambispect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Lozano, Diana L., Camarillo-Nava, Víctor Manuel, Juárez-Zepeda, Tarsila Elizabeth, Andrade-Pineda, José Elpidio, Pérez-López, Danae, Reyes-Pacheco, Jorge Armando, Lucho-Gutiérrez, Zuley Margarita, Carmona-Aparicio, Liliana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10396055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37201213
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2) is a public health and socioeconomic problem, generating direct medical costs for its treatment. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of monotherapy and bitherapy treatments in patients with DM2. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness, observational, ambispective, cross-sectional and analytical analysis of files in a first level medical unit. The data in the cost matrix was executed with the Office Excel 2010 program; the most prescribed drug was identified and compared with monotherapy and bitherapy. RESULTS: The annual direct medical costs of the total population were drug cost $118,561.70MN, hospitalization cost $243,756.00MN, consultation cost $327,414.00MN and clinical trial cost $2416.79MN, obtaining an annual total of $692,148.58MN. metformin was the most indicated in monotherapy (88.4%) and as standard therapy it has higher cost-effectiveness compared to glibenclamide. In bitherapy it was metformin/glibenclamide (35.7%) versus the therapeutics of metformin/NPH insulin, metformin/insulin glargine and metformin/dapagliflozin, which had a better cost-effective result, with an incremental cost effectiveness of -$1,128,428.50MN, -$34,365.00 MN, -$119,848.97MN respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin presented a better cost-effectiveness ratio in monotherapy, while in bitherapy it was the metformin/NPH insulin association.