Cargando…

Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design

KEY MESSAGE: Training sets produced by maximizing the number of parent lines, each involved in one cross, had the highest prediction accuracy for H0 hybrids, but lowest for H1 and H2 hybrids. ABSTRACT: Genomic prediction holds great promise for hybrid breeding but optimum composition of the training...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melchinger, Albrecht E., Fernando, Rohan, Stricker, Christian, Schön, Chris-Carolin, Auinger, Hans-Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10397156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37532821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04413-y
_version_ 1785083857930813440
author Melchinger, Albrecht E.
Fernando, Rohan
Stricker, Christian
Schön, Chris-Carolin
Auinger, Hans-Jürgen
author_facet Melchinger, Albrecht E.
Fernando, Rohan
Stricker, Christian
Schön, Chris-Carolin
Auinger, Hans-Jürgen
author_sort Melchinger, Albrecht E.
collection PubMed
description KEY MESSAGE: Training sets produced by maximizing the number of parent lines, each involved in one cross, had the highest prediction accuracy for H0 hybrids, but lowest for H1 and H2 hybrids. ABSTRACT: Genomic prediction holds great promise for hybrid breeding but optimum composition of the training set (TS) as determined by the number of parents (n(TS)) and crosses per parent (c) has received little attention. Our objective was to examine prediction accuracy ([Formula: see text] ) of GCA for lines used as parents of the TS (I1 lines) or not (I0 lines), and H0, H1 and H2 hybrids, comprising crosses of type I0 × I0, I1 × I0 and I1 × I1, respectively, as function of n(TS) and c. In the theory, we developed estimates for [Formula: see text] of GBLUPs for hybrids: (i)[Formula: see text] based on the expected prediction accuracy, and (ii) [Formula: see text] based on [Formula: see text] of GBLUPs of GCA and SCA effects. In the simulation part, hybrid populations were generated using molecular data from two experimental maize data sets. Additive and dominance effects of QTL borrowed from literature were used to simulate six scenarios of traits differing in the proportion (τ(SCA) = 1%, 6%, 22%) of SCA variance in σ(G)(2) and heritability (h(2) = 0.4, 0.8). Values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] closely agreed with [Formula: see text] for hybrids. For given size N(TS) = n(TS) × c of TS, [Formula: see text] of H0 hybrids and GCA of I0 lines was highest for c = 1. Conversely, for GCA of I1 lines and H1 and H2 hybrids, c = 1 yielded lowest [Formula: see text] with concordant results across all scenarios for both data sets. In view of these opposite trends, the optimum choice of c for maximizing selection response across all types of hybrids depends on the size and resources of the breeding program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00122-023-04413-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10397156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103971562023-08-04 Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design Melchinger, Albrecht E. Fernando, Rohan Stricker, Christian Schön, Chris-Carolin Auinger, Hans-Jürgen Theor Appl Genet Original Article KEY MESSAGE: Training sets produced by maximizing the number of parent lines, each involved in one cross, had the highest prediction accuracy for H0 hybrids, but lowest for H1 and H2 hybrids. ABSTRACT: Genomic prediction holds great promise for hybrid breeding but optimum composition of the training set (TS) as determined by the number of parents (n(TS)) and crosses per parent (c) has received little attention. Our objective was to examine prediction accuracy ([Formula: see text] ) of GCA for lines used as parents of the TS (I1 lines) or not (I0 lines), and H0, H1 and H2 hybrids, comprising crosses of type I0 × I0, I1 × I0 and I1 × I1, respectively, as function of n(TS) and c. In the theory, we developed estimates for [Formula: see text] of GBLUPs for hybrids: (i)[Formula: see text] based on the expected prediction accuracy, and (ii) [Formula: see text] based on [Formula: see text] of GBLUPs of GCA and SCA effects. In the simulation part, hybrid populations were generated using molecular data from two experimental maize data sets. Additive and dominance effects of QTL borrowed from literature were used to simulate six scenarios of traits differing in the proportion (τ(SCA) = 1%, 6%, 22%) of SCA variance in σ(G)(2) and heritability (h(2) = 0.4, 0.8). Values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] closely agreed with [Formula: see text] for hybrids. For given size N(TS) = n(TS) × c of TS, [Formula: see text] of H0 hybrids and GCA of I0 lines was highest for c = 1. Conversely, for GCA of I1 lines and H1 and H2 hybrids, c = 1 yielded lowest [Formula: see text] with concordant results across all scenarios for both data sets. In view of these opposite trends, the optimum choice of c for maximizing selection response across all types of hybrids depends on the size and resources of the breeding program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00122-023-04413-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-08-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10397156/ /pubmed/37532821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04413-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Melchinger, Albrecht E.
Fernando, Rohan
Stricker, Christian
Schön, Chris-Carolin
Auinger, Hans-Jürgen
Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design
title Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design
title_full Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design
title_fullStr Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design
title_full_unstemmed Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design
title_short Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design
title_sort genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: i. optimizing the training set design
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10397156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37532821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04413-y
work_keys_str_mv AT melchingeralbrechte genomicpredictioninhybridbreedingioptimizingthetrainingsetdesign
AT fernandorohan genomicpredictioninhybridbreedingioptimizingthetrainingsetdesign
AT strickerchristian genomicpredictioninhybridbreedingioptimizingthetrainingsetdesign
AT schonchriscarolin genomicpredictioninhybridbreedingioptimizingthetrainingsetdesign
AT auingerhansjurgen genomicpredictioninhybridbreedingioptimizingthetrainingsetdesign