Cargando…

Efficacy of azilsartan on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared with candesartan: J-TASTE randomized controlled trial

Characterized by ventricular and vascular stiffness, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has led to high morbidity and mortality. As azilsartan is an angiotensin receptor blocker with the highest myocardial and vascular affinities, azilsartan may improve the left ventricular (LV)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ito, Shin, Takahama, Hiroyuki, Asakura, Masanori, Abe, Yukio, Ajioka, Masayoshi, Anzai, Toshihisa, Arikawa, Takuo, Hayashi, Takaharu, Higashino, Yorihiko, Hiramitsu, Shinya, Iwahashi, Noriaki, Izumi, Chisato, Kimura, Kazuo, Kinugawa, Koichiro, Kioka, Hidetaka, Lim, Young-Jae, Matsuoka, Ken, Matsuoka, Satoshi, Motoki, Hirohiko, Nakamura, Sunao, Nakayama, Takafumi, Nomura, Akihiro, Sasaoka, Taishi, Takiuchi, Shin, Toyoda, Shigeru, Ueda, Tomoya, Watanabe, Tetsuya, Yamada, Akira, Yamamoto, Masayoshi, Sozu, Takashi, Kitakaze, Masafumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10397297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37532820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39779-y
_version_ 1785083884763873280
author Ito, Shin
Takahama, Hiroyuki
Asakura, Masanori
Abe, Yukio
Ajioka, Masayoshi
Anzai, Toshihisa
Arikawa, Takuo
Hayashi, Takaharu
Higashino, Yorihiko
Hiramitsu, Shinya
Iwahashi, Noriaki
Izumi, Chisato
Kimura, Kazuo
Kinugawa, Koichiro
Kioka, Hidetaka
Lim, Young-Jae
Matsuoka, Ken
Matsuoka, Satoshi
Motoki, Hirohiko
Nakamura, Sunao
Nakayama, Takafumi
Nomura, Akihiro
Sasaoka, Taishi
Takiuchi, Shin
Toyoda, Shigeru
Ueda, Tomoya
Watanabe, Tetsuya
Yamada, Akira
Yamamoto, Masayoshi
Sozu, Takashi
Kitakaze, Masafumi
author_facet Ito, Shin
Takahama, Hiroyuki
Asakura, Masanori
Abe, Yukio
Ajioka, Masayoshi
Anzai, Toshihisa
Arikawa, Takuo
Hayashi, Takaharu
Higashino, Yorihiko
Hiramitsu, Shinya
Iwahashi, Noriaki
Izumi, Chisato
Kimura, Kazuo
Kinugawa, Koichiro
Kioka, Hidetaka
Lim, Young-Jae
Matsuoka, Ken
Matsuoka, Satoshi
Motoki, Hirohiko
Nakamura, Sunao
Nakayama, Takafumi
Nomura, Akihiro
Sasaoka, Taishi
Takiuchi, Shin
Toyoda, Shigeru
Ueda, Tomoya
Watanabe, Tetsuya
Yamada, Akira
Yamamoto, Masayoshi
Sozu, Takashi
Kitakaze, Masafumi
author_sort Ito, Shin
collection PubMed
description Characterized by ventricular and vascular stiffness, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has led to high morbidity and mortality. As azilsartan is an angiotensin receptor blocker with the highest myocardial and vascular affinities, azilsartan may improve the left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients with hypertension and either HFpEF or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) more than candesartan. In this randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned 193 hypertensive patients with HF and LV ejection fraction ≥ 45% to 20 mg of azilsartan (n = 95) or 8 mg of candesartan (n = 98), once daily for 48 weeks. After the initiation of treatment, changes in the doses of the study drugs were permitted based on the patient’s conditions, including blood pressure (median dose at 48 weeks: azilsartan 20.0 mg/day, candesartan 8.0 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in the ratio of peak early diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E) to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e′) (E/e′). Adjusted least-squares mean (LSM) change in E/e′ was − 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] − 1.49 to − 0.04) in the azilsartan group and 0.2 (95% CI − 0.49 to 0.94) in the candesartan group, providing the LSM differences of − 1.0 (95% CI − 2.01 to 0.03, P = 0.057). The median change in left atrial volume index was – 2.7 mL/m(2) with azilsartan vs 1.4 mL/m(2) with candesartan (P = 0.091). The frequency of adverse events related to hypotension and hyperkalemia did not differ between the groups. The current study did not provide strong evidence that azilsartan improves LV diastolic dysfunction, and further confirmatory study is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10397297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103972972023-08-04 Efficacy of azilsartan on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared with candesartan: J-TASTE randomized controlled trial Ito, Shin Takahama, Hiroyuki Asakura, Masanori Abe, Yukio Ajioka, Masayoshi Anzai, Toshihisa Arikawa, Takuo Hayashi, Takaharu Higashino, Yorihiko Hiramitsu, Shinya Iwahashi, Noriaki Izumi, Chisato Kimura, Kazuo Kinugawa, Koichiro Kioka, Hidetaka Lim, Young-Jae Matsuoka, Ken Matsuoka, Satoshi Motoki, Hirohiko Nakamura, Sunao Nakayama, Takafumi Nomura, Akihiro Sasaoka, Taishi Takiuchi, Shin Toyoda, Shigeru Ueda, Tomoya Watanabe, Tetsuya Yamada, Akira Yamamoto, Masayoshi Sozu, Takashi Kitakaze, Masafumi Sci Rep Article Characterized by ventricular and vascular stiffness, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has led to high morbidity and mortality. As azilsartan is an angiotensin receptor blocker with the highest myocardial and vascular affinities, azilsartan may improve the left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients with hypertension and either HFpEF or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) more than candesartan. In this randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned 193 hypertensive patients with HF and LV ejection fraction ≥ 45% to 20 mg of azilsartan (n = 95) or 8 mg of candesartan (n = 98), once daily for 48 weeks. After the initiation of treatment, changes in the doses of the study drugs were permitted based on the patient’s conditions, including blood pressure (median dose at 48 weeks: azilsartan 20.0 mg/day, candesartan 8.0 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in the ratio of peak early diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E) to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e′) (E/e′). Adjusted least-squares mean (LSM) change in E/e′ was − 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] − 1.49 to − 0.04) in the azilsartan group and 0.2 (95% CI − 0.49 to 0.94) in the candesartan group, providing the LSM differences of − 1.0 (95% CI − 2.01 to 0.03, P = 0.057). The median change in left atrial volume index was – 2.7 mL/m(2) with azilsartan vs 1.4 mL/m(2) with candesartan (P = 0.091). The frequency of adverse events related to hypotension and hyperkalemia did not differ between the groups. The current study did not provide strong evidence that azilsartan improves LV diastolic dysfunction, and further confirmatory study is required. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10397297/ /pubmed/37532820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39779-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ito, Shin
Takahama, Hiroyuki
Asakura, Masanori
Abe, Yukio
Ajioka, Masayoshi
Anzai, Toshihisa
Arikawa, Takuo
Hayashi, Takaharu
Higashino, Yorihiko
Hiramitsu, Shinya
Iwahashi, Noriaki
Izumi, Chisato
Kimura, Kazuo
Kinugawa, Koichiro
Kioka, Hidetaka
Lim, Young-Jae
Matsuoka, Ken
Matsuoka, Satoshi
Motoki, Hirohiko
Nakamura, Sunao
Nakayama, Takafumi
Nomura, Akihiro
Sasaoka, Taishi
Takiuchi, Shin
Toyoda, Shigeru
Ueda, Tomoya
Watanabe, Tetsuya
Yamada, Akira
Yamamoto, Masayoshi
Sozu, Takashi
Kitakaze, Masafumi
Efficacy of azilsartan on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared with candesartan: J-TASTE randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of azilsartan on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared with candesartan: J-TASTE randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of azilsartan on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared with candesartan: J-TASTE randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of azilsartan on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared with candesartan: J-TASTE randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of azilsartan on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared with candesartan: J-TASTE randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of azilsartan on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared with candesartan: J-TASTE randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of azilsartan on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared with candesartan: j-taste randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10397297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37532820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39779-y
work_keys_str_mv AT itoshin efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT takahamahiroyuki efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT asakuramasanori efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abeyukio efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ajiokamasayoshi efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT anzaitoshihisa efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT arikawatakuo efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hayashitakaharu efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT higashinoyorihiko efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hiramitsushinya efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT iwahashinoriaki efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT izumichisato efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimurakazuo efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kinugawakoichiro efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kiokahidetaka efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT limyoungjae efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT matsuokaken efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT matsuokasatoshi efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT motokihirohiko efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nakamurasunao efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nakayamatakafumi efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nomuraakihiro efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sasaokataishi efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT takiuchishin efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT toyodashigeru efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT uedatomoya efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT watanabetetsuya efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yamadaakira efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yamamotomasayoshi efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sozutakashi efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kitakazemasafumi efficacyofazilsartanonleftventriculardiastolicdysfunctioncomparedwithcandesartanjtasterandomizedcontrolledtrial