Cargando…

Does Hepatitis C Treatment Adherence Affect Risk of Liver Transplantation? A Historical Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the primary cause of liver failure leading to transplantation, and medication adherence is essential to the therapeutic efficacy of HCV treatments. While there is evidence linking poor adherence with increased utilization and cost, published literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ems, Derek, Racsa, Patrick, Anderson, Chris, Gregory, Fran, Worley, Karen, Brill, Joel V., Holt, Worthe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10397588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27348286
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.863
_version_ 1785083943302725632
author Ems, Derek
Racsa, Patrick
Anderson, Chris
Gregory, Fran
Worley, Karen
Brill, Joel V.
Holt, Worthe
author_facet Ems, Derek
Racsa, Patrick
Anderson, Chris
Gregory, Fran
Worley, Karen
Brill, Joel V.
Holt, Worthe
author_sort Ems, Derek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the primary cause of liver failure leading to transplantation, and medication adherence is essential to the therapeutic efficacy of HCV treatments. While there is evidence linking poor adherence with increased utilization and cost, published literature lacks examination of the association between medication adherence and risk of liver transplant. In addition, the impact of HCV treatment on total costs of liver transplantation is not well documented. OBJECTIVES: To compare (a) the relative risk of liver transplant by adherence in patients treated for HCV and (b) the total health care costs in treated and untreated patients who require liver transplant. METHODS: This observational, historical cohort study was conducted using administrative data from the Humana Research Database. To be included, patients were required to have a documented HCV diagnosis or treatment between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2013. Patients were excluded if they had a hepatitis B diagnosis, were not fully insured by a commercial or Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plan, or were outside the age range of 19-89 years. No minimum pre- or post-index enrollment period was required, and patients were followed for their entire post-index enrollment through December 31, 2013. The study population was divided into treated and untreated groups and then subdivided by presence or absence of a liver transplant. Date of liver transplant was defined as the index date for untreated liver transplant patients; otherwise, the index date was defined as either the date of first observed HCV treatment or diagnosis date (if no treatment or liver transplant). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk of liver transplant by level of treatment adherence (> 80%, 50%-79%, and < 50%) based on proportion of days covered. General linearized models with log link and gamma distribution were used to compare median total health care costs from index date until end of study period (or death/disenrollment, whichever came first) between treated and untreated liver transplant patients. All costs were converted to 2013 U.S. dollars and reported as total costs per patient and per patient per month (PPPM) to account for varying follow-up periods. RESULTS: Of the 53,423 patients identified with HCV, 10,377 met exclusion criteria, leaving 43,046 patients (primarily Caucasian, males, mean age of 58 years) in the initial cohort. Only 6.29% (n = 2,708) of the total HCV cohort received HCV treatment, and less than 1% (n = 366, 0.8%) received a liver transplant. Although there were no significant differences in the risk of liver transplant by adherence level, there was an upwards trend in the rate of liver transplant as adherence worsened (> 80%: 1.25%; 50%-79%: 1.30%; and < 50%: 1.99%), and the average days to liver transplant was longer with higher adherence (> 80%: 683; 50%-79%: 623; < 50%: 454). Only 48 (13.11%) patients who received a liver transplant were treated for HCV. Adjusted median total and PPPM health care costs measured from index date until end of the study period were significantly higher for patients who received HCV treatment compared with those who did not (total=$231,139 vs. $86,167, adjusted P < 0.001; PPPM=$20,583 vs. $5,778, adjusted P = 0.008), driven by HCV-related medical costs and total pharmacy costs. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence with HCV regimens did not affect risk of liver transplant, underscoring the need for further evidence linking treatment adherence to future liver transplant risk. HCV-treated patients who required liver transplant incurred significantly higher health care costs than those without HCV treatment before liver transplant. Introduction of newer all-oral direct-acting antiviral regimens, with higher acquisition costs, will require further research to more accurately assess medication adherence and its relationship with transplantation, as well as with total health care costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10397588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103975882023-08-04 Does Hepatitis C Treatment Adherence Affect Risk of Liver Transplantation? A Historical Cohort Study Ems, Derek Racsa, Patrick Anderson, Chris Gregory, Fran Worley, Karen Brill, Joel V. Holt, Worthe J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the primary cause of liver failure leading to transplantation, and medication adherence is essential to the therapeutic efficacy of HCV treatments. While there is evidence linking poor adherence with increased utilization and cost, published literature lacks examination of the association between medication adherence and risk of liver transplant. In addition, the impact of HCV treatment on total costs of liver transplantation is not well documented. OBJECTIVES: To compare (a) the relative risk of liver transplant by adherence in patients treated for HCV and (b) the total health care costs in treated and untreated patients who require liver transplant. METHODS: This observational, historical cohort study was conducted using administrative data from the Humana Research Database. To be included, patients were required to have a documented HCV diagnosis or treatment between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2013. Patients were excluded if they had a hepatitis B diagnosis, were not fully insured by a commercial or Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plan, or were outside the age range of 19-89 years. No minimum pre- or post-index enrollment period was required, and patients were followed for their entire post-index enrollment through December 31, 2013. The study population was divided into treated and untreated groups and then subdivided by presence or absence of a liver transplant. Date of liver transplant was defined as the index date for untreated liver transplant patients; otherwise, the index date was defined as either the date of first observed HCV treatment or diagnosis date (if no treatment or liver transplant). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk of liver transplant by level of treatment adherence (> 80%, 50%-79%, and < 50%) based on proportion of days covered. General linearized models with log link and gamma distribution were used to compare median total health care costs from index date until end of study period (or death/disenrollment, whichever came first) between treated and untreated liver transplant patients. All costs were converted to 2013 U.S. dollars and reported as total costs per patient and per patient per month (PPPM) to account for varying follow-up periods. RESULTS: Of the 53,423 patients identified with HCV, 10,377 met exclusion criteria, leaving 43,046 patients (primarily Caucasian, males, mean age of 58 years) in the initial cohort. Only 6.29% (n = 2,708) of the total HCV cohort received HCV treatment, and less than 1% (n = 366, 0.8%) received a liver transplant. Although there were no significant differences in the risk of liver transplant by adherence level, there was an upwards trend in the rate of liver transplant as adherence worsened (> 80%: 1.25%; 50%-79%: 1.30%; and < 50%: 1.99%), and the average days to liver transplant was longer with higher adherence (> 80%: 683; 50%-79%: 623; < 50%: 454). Only 48 (13.11%) patients who received a liver transplant were treated for HCV. Adjusted median total and PPPM health care costs measured from index date until end of the study period were significantly higher for patients who received HCV treatment compared with those who did not (total=$231,139 vs. $86,167, adjusted P < 0.001; PPPM=$20,583 vs. $5,778, adjusted P = 0.008), driven by HCV-related medical costs and total pharmacy costs. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence with HCV regimens did not affect risk of liver transplant, underscoring the need for further evidence linking treatment adherence to future liver transplant risk. HCV-treated patients who required liver transplant incurred significantly higher health care costs than those without HCV treatment before liver transplant. Introduction of newer all-oral direct-acting antiviral regimens, with higher acquisition costs, will require further research to more accurately assess medication adherence and its relationship with transplantation, as well as with total health care costs. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10397588/ /pubmed/27348286 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.863 Text en © 2016, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Ems, Derek
Racsa, Patrick
Anderson, Chris
Gregory, Fran
Worley, Karen
Brill, Joel V.
Holt, Worthe
Does Hepatitis C Treatment Adherence Affect Risk of Liver Transplantation? A Historical Cohort Study
title Does Hepatitis C Treatment Adherence Affect Risk of Liver Transplantation? A Historical Cohort Study
title_full Does Hepatitis C Treatment Adherence Affect Risk of Liver Transplantation? A Historical Cohort Study
title_fullStr Does Hepatitis C Treatment Adherence Affect Risk of Liver Transplantation? A Historical Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Does Hepatitis C Treatment Adherence Affect Risk of Liver Transplantation? A Historical Cohort Study
title_short Does Hepatitis C Treatment Adherence Affect Risk of Liver Transplantation? A Historical Cohort Study
title_sort does hepatitis c treatment adherence affect risk of liver transplantation? a historical cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10397588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27348286
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.863
work_keys_str_mv AT emsderek doeshepatitisctreatmentadherenceaffectriskoflivertransplantationahistoricalcohortstudy
AT racsapatrick doeshepatitisctreatmentadherenceaffectriskoflivertransplantationahistoricalcohortstudy
AT andersonchris doeshepatitisctreatmentadherenceaffectriskoflivertransplantationahistoricalcohortstudy
AT gregoryfran doeshepatitisctreatmentadherenceaffectriskoflivertransplantationahistoricalcohortstudy
AT worleykaren doeshepatitisctreatmentadherenceaffectriskoflivertransplantationahistoricalcohortstudy
AT brilljoelv doeshepatitisctreatmentadherenceaffectriskoflivertransplantationahistoricalcohortstudy
AT holtworthe doeshepatitisctreatmentadherenceaffectriskoflivertransplantationahistoricalcohortstudy