Cargando…
Is There a Relationship Between Part D Medication Adherence and Part C Intermediate Outcomes Star Ratings Measures?
BACKGROUND: Improvements in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) star ratings Part D medication adherence measures may affect performance in Part C intermediate outcome measures for which the Part D targeted medication classes are prescribed. OBJECTIVE: To determine if Part D medic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10397682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27348279 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.787 |
_version_ | 1785083953122639872 |
---|---|
author | Ta, Jamie T. Erickson, Sara C. Qiu, Wenyi (Amanda) Patel, Bimal V. |
author_facet | Ta, Jamie T. Erickson, Sara C. Qiu, Wenyi (Amanda) Patel, Bimal V. |
author_sort | Ta, Jamie T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improvements in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) star ratings Part D medication adherence measures may affect performance in Part C intermediate outcome measures for which the Part D targeted medication classes are prescribed. OBJECTIVE: To determine if Part D medication adherence measures are associated with corresponding Part C intermediate outcome measures. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis using the CMS 2015 star ratings report (based on 2013 benefit year plan data) for Medicare contracts. The measures of interest included the Part D adherence measures for diabetes medications, antihypertensive agents, and statins and the Part C intermediate outcome measures for controlled blood sugar, blood pressure, and cholesterol. All Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) contracts with complete data for all Part C and D measures of interest were included. Contracts with ≥ 25% of total enrollment with MA-only benefit were excluded. Linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between 2015 Part D adherence measures and Part C intermediate outcome measures (n = 366). The regression models were adjusted for low-income subsidy (LIS) beneficiary enrollment and log-transformed (natural logarithm) total contract enrollment. RESULTS: Bivariate linear regression models demonstrated moderate positive associations between each of the 2015 Part D adherence scores and related 2015 Part C measures that explained 27%-29% (R(2)) of variance. Including LIS and total contract enrollment in the regression models increased the R2 to 30%-36%. The multivariate logistic regression models showed that each percentage point of improvement in the 2015 Part D adherence measures was associated with a 4.13 to 4.69 greater odds of performing in the top quartile in corresponding 2015 Part C measures. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate positive associations were observed between the Part D and Part C scores in the same benefit year. MAPD plans may observe improved Part C intermediate outcome measures with strategies that improve Part D medication adherence measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10397682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103976822023-08-04 Is There a Relationship Between Part D Medication Adherence and Part C Intermediate Outcomes Star Ratings Measures? Ta, Jamie T. Erickson, Sara C. Qiu, Wenyi (Amanda) Patel, Bimal V. J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Improvements in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) star ratings Part D medication adherence measures may affect performance in Part C intermediate outcome measures for which the Part D targeted medication classes are prescribed. OBJECTIVE: To determine if Part D medication adherence measures are associated with corresponding Part C intermediate outcome measures. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis using the CMS 2015 star ratings report (based on 2013 benefit year plan data) for Medicare contracts. The measures of interest included the Part D adherence measures for diabetes medications, antihypertensive agents, and statins and the Part C intermediate outcome measures for controlled blood sugar, blood pressure, and cholesterol. All Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) contracts with complete data for all Part C and D measures of interest were included. Contracts with ≥ 25% of total enrollment with MA-only benefit were excluded. Linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between 2015 Part D adherence measures and Part C intermediate outcome measures (n = 366). The regression models were adjusted for low-income subsidy (LIS) beneficiary enrollment and log-transformed (natural logarithm) total contract enrollment. RESULTS: Bivariate linear regression models demonstrated moderate positive associations between each of the 2015 Part D adherence scores and related 2015 Part C measures that explained 27%-29% (R(2)) of variance. Including LIS and total contract enrollment in the regression models increased the R2 to 30%-36%. The multivariate logistic regression models showed that each percentage point of improvement in the 2015 Part D adherence measures was associated with a 4.13 to 4.69 greater odds of performing in the top quartile in corresponding 2015 Part C measures. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate positive associations were observed between the Part D and Part C scores in the same benefit year. MAPD plans may observe improved Part C intermediate outcome measures with strategies that improve Part D medication adherence measures. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10397682/ /pubmed/27348279 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.787 Text en © 2016, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ta, Jamie T. Erickson, Sara C. Qiu, Wenyi (Amanda) Patel, Bimal V. Is There a Relationship Between Part D Medication Adherence and Part C Intermediate Outcomes Star Ratings Measures? |
title | Is There a Relationship Between Part D Medication Adherence and Part C Intermediate Outcomes Star Ratings Measures? |
title_full | Is There a Relationship Between Part D Medication Adherence and Part C Intermediate Outcomes Star Ratings Measures? |
title_fullStr | Is There a Relationship Between Part D Medication Adherence and Part C Intermediate Outcomes Star Ratings Measures? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is There a Relationship Between Part D Medication Adherence and Part C Intermediate Outcomes Star Ratings Measures? |
title_short | Is There a Relationship Between Part D Medication Adherence and Part C Intermediate Outcomes Star Ratings Measures? |
title_sort | is there a relationship between part d medication adherence and part c intermediate outcomes star ratings measures? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10397682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27348279 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.787 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tajamiet istherearelationshipbetweenpartdmedicationadherenceandpartcintermediateoutcomesstarratingsmeasures AT ericksonsarac istherearelationshipbetweenpartdmedicationadherenceandpartcintermediateoutcomesstarratingsmeasures AT qiuwenyiamanda istherearelationshipbetweenpartdmedicationadherenceandpartcintermediateoutcomesstarratingsmeasures AT patelbimalv istherearelationshipbetweenpartdmedicationadherenceandpartcintermediateoutcomesstarratingsmeasures |