Cargando…

Administration and Burden of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in U.S. and Canadian Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND: Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) is the only available treatment that alters the natural course of allergies and has possible disease-modifying effects. AIT is administered primarily via subcutaneous injection delivered in a physician’s office. Few studies have been conducted in the United St...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blume, Steven W., Yeomans, Karen, Allen-Ramey, Felicia, Smith, Nancy, Kim, Harold, Lockey, Richard F., Nichol, Michael B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10397750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26521110
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.11.982
_version_ 1785083962874396672
author Blume, Steven W.
Yeomans, Karen
Allen-Ramey, Felicia
Smith, Nancy
Kim, Harold
Lockey, Richard F.
Nichol, Michael B.
author_facet Blume, Steven W.
Yeomans, Karen
Allen-Ramey, Felicia
Smith, Nancy
Kim, Harold
Lockey, Richard F.
Nichol, Michael B.
author_sort Blume, Steven W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) is the only available treatment that alters the natural course of allergies and has possible disease-modifying effects. AIT is administered primarily via subcutaneous injection delivered in a physician’s office. Few studies have been conducted in the United States or Canada to evaluate the costs of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). OBJECTIVES: To (a) describe SCIT administration processes, resources, and costs and (b) characterize the patient population receiving SCIT. METHODS: A multisite, prospective, observational time and motion study was conducted. Injection and wait times were collected by a third-party observer on 1 visit for each patient. Extract preparation processes were also observed. Site staff reported on treatment protocols, administrative time, supplies, and patient medical history. Patients responded to questionnaires on demographics, reasons for treatment, medication use, productivity, and travel time. Costs were estimated by applying unit costs to the time observations and the patient- and staff-reported data. RESULTS: A total of 670 SCIT patients were enrolled at 6 sites in the United States and 6 sites in Canada. Average age in the United States was 41 years (SD = 18) and 44 years (15) in Canada, with 10% of the patients aged ≥ 65 years. Annual incomes were over $100,000 for 40% of U.S. patients and 30% of Canadian patients. U.S. patients had over 4 times as many different allergens in their SCIT treatments as Canadian patients, with a mean of 18 versus 4. The most common reasons reported for starting SCIT was a “desire to cure allergies once and for all” (73%) and that “symptoms are not improved by allergy medications” (60%). Percentages of patients taking allergy medications in the 4 weeks prior to observation were 86% in the United States and 66% in Canada: antihistamines 75% United States, 54% Canada; inhaled corticosteroids 32% United States, 22% Canada. The predominant comorbidity was asthma, 43% United States, 24% Canada. Site protocols for build-up treatment phases were 1 to 2 injections per week for an average of 25 weeks (range 12-52). Maintenance phases were 1 injection every 3 to 4 weeks for an average of 4 years (range 2.5-5). Eight of the sites had total mean staff times per injection visit of 7 to 22 minutes; 1 site averaged fewer minutes, and 3 sites averaged more. Total direct medical costs were an average of $30 for Canadian patients per visit and $32 per visit for U.S. patients, half accounted for by the cost of the extract. Pre- and postinjection administrative tasks were the second largest driver of direct costs. Total injection visit-related time for patients, including round-trip travel time, averaged about 80 minutes per visit in the United States and in Canada. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses revealed substantial variation in SCIT regimens among sites, but the sites had commonalities in the injection process components. SCIT requires patient commitment to a long-term treatment regimen involving numerous clinic visits and resources for administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10397750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103977502023-08-04 Administration and Burden of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in U.S. and Canadian Clinical Practice Blume, Steven W. Yeomans, Karen Allen-Ramey, Felicia Smith, Nancy Kim, Harold Lockey, Richard F. Nichol, Michael B. J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) is the only available treatment that alters the natural course of allergies and has possible disease-modifying effects. AIT is administered primarily via subcutaneous injection delivered in a physician’s office. Few studies have been conducted in the United States or Canada to evaluate the costs of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). OBJECTIVES: To (a) describe SCIT administration processes, resources, and costs and (b) characterize the patient population receiving SCIT. METHODS: A multisite, prospective, observational time and motion study was conducted. Injection and wait times were collected by a third-party observer on 1 visit for each patient. Extract preparation processes were also observed. Site staff reported on treatment protocols, administrative time, supplies, and patient medical history. Patients responded to questionnaires on demographics, reasons for treatment, medication use, productivity, and travel time. Costs were estimated by applying unit costs to the time observations and the patient- and staff-reported data. RESULTS: A total of 670 SCIT patients were enrolled at 6 sites in the United States and 6 sites in Canada. Average age in the United States was 41 years (SD = 18) and 44 years (15) in Canada, with 10% of the patients aged ≥ 65 years. Annual incomes were over $100,000 for 40% of U.S. patients and 30% of Canadian patients. U.S. patients had over 4 times as many different allergens in their SCIT treatments as Canadian patients, with a mean of 18 versus 4. The most common reasons reported for starting SCIT was a “desire to cure allergies once and for all” (73%) and that “symptoms are not improved by allergy medications” (60%). Percentages of patients taking allergy medications in the 4 weeks prior to observation were 86% in the United States and 66% in Canada: antihistamines 75% United States, 54% Canada; inhaled corticosteroids 32% United States, 22% Canada. The predominant comorbidity was asthma, 43% United States, 24% Canada. Site protocols for build-up treatment phases were 1 to 2 injections per week for an average of 25 weeks (range 12-52). Maintenance phases were 1 injection every 3 to 4 weeks for an average of 4 years (range 2.5-5). Eight of the sites had total mean staff times per injection visit of 7 to 22 minutes; 1 site averaged fewer minutes, and 3 sites averaged more. Total direct medical costs were an average of $30 for Canadian patients per visit and $32 per visit for U.S. patients, half accounted for by the cost of the extract. Pre- and postinjection administrative tasks were the second largest driver of direct costs. Total injection visit-related time for patients, including round-trip travel time, averaged about 80 minutes per visit in the United States and in Canada. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses revealed substantial variation in SCIT regimens among sites, but the sites had commonalities in the injection process components. SCIT requires patient commitment to a long-term treatment regimen involving numerous clinic visits and resources for administration. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2015-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10397750/ /pubmed/26521110 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.11.982 Text en © 2015, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Blume, Steven W.
Yeomans, Karen
Allen-Ramey, Felicia
Smith, Nancy
Kim, Harold
Lockey, Richard F.
Nichol, Michael B.
Administration and Burden of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in U.S. and Canadian Clinical Practice
title Administration and Burden of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in U.S. and Canadian Clinical Practice
title_full Administration and Burden of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in U.S. and Canadian Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Administration and Burden of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in U.S. and Canadian Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Administration and Burden of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in U.S. and Canadian Clinical Practice
title_short Administration and Burden of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis in U.S. and Canadian Clinical Practice
title_sort administration and burden of subcutaneous immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis in u.s. and canadian clinical practice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10397750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26521110
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.11.982
work_keys_str_mv AT blumestevenw administrationandburdenofsubcutaneousimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisinusandcanadianclinicalpractice
AT yeomanskaren administrationandburdenofsubcutaneousimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisinusandcanadianclinicalpractice
AT allenrameyfelicia administrationandburdenofsubcutaneousimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisinusandcanadianclinicalpractice
AT smithnancy administrationandburdenofsubcutaneousimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisinusandcanadianclinicalpractice
AT kimharold administrationandburdenofsubcutaneousimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisinusandcanadianclinicalpractice
AT lockeyrichardf administrationandburdenofsubcutaneousimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisinusandcanadianclinicalpractice
AT nicholmichaelb administrationandburdenofsubcutaneousimmunotherapyforallergicrhinitisinusandcanadianclinicalpractice