Cargando…

Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) costs $21 billion annually in direct health care costs, 80% of which is directly attributable to hospitalizations. The SHIFT clinical study demonstrated that ivabradine plus standard of care (SoC) reduced HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations compared with SoC alon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borer, Jeffrey S., Kansal, Anuraag R., Dorman, Emily D., Krotneva, Stanimira, Zheng, Ying, Patel, Harshali K., Tavazzi, Luigi, Komajda, Michel, Ford, Ian, Böhm, Michael, Kielhorn, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579829
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.9.1064
_version_ 1785084002357477376
author Borer, Jeffrey S.
Kansal, Anuraag R.
Dorman, Emily D.
Krotneva, Stanimira
Zheng, Ying
Patel, Harshali K.
Tavazzi, Luigi
Komajda, Michel
Ford, Ian
Böhm, Michael
Kielhorn, Adrian
author_facet Borer, Jeffrey S.
Kansal, Anuraag R.
Dorman, Emily D.
Krotneva, Stanimira
Zheng, Ying
Patel, Harshali K.
Tavazzi, Luigi
Komajda, Michel
Ford, Ian
Böhm, Michael
Kielhorn, Adrian
author_sort Borer, Jeffrey S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) costs $21 billion annually in direct health care costs, 80% of which is directly attributable to hospitalizations. The SHIFT clinical study demonstrated that ivabradine plus standard of care (SoC) reduced HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations compared with SoC alone. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact of ivabradine from a U.S. commercial payer perspective. METHODS: A budget impact model estimated the per-member-per month (PMPM) impact of introducing ivabradine to existing formularies by comparing a reference scenario (SoC) and a new drug scenario (ivabradine + SoC) in hypothetical 1 million-member commercial and Medicare Advantage plans. In both scenarios, U.S. claims data were used for the reference cumulative annual rates of hospitalizations (HF, non-HF cardiovascular [CV], and non-CV), and hospitalization rates were adjusted using SHIFT data. The model controlled for mortality risk using SHIFT and U.S. life table data, and hospitalization costs were obtained from U.S. claims data: HF-related = $37,507; non-HF CV = $28,951; and non-CV = $17,904. The annualized wholesale acquisition cost of ivabradine was $4,500, with baseline use for this new drug at 2%, increasing 2% per year. RESULTS: Based on the approved U.S. indication, approximately 2,000 commercially insured patients from a 1 million-member commercial plan were eligible to receive ivabradine. Ivabradine resulted in a PMPM cost savings of $0.01 and $0.04 in years 1 and 3 of the core model, respectively. After including the acquisition price for ivabradine, the model showed a decrease in total costs in the commercial ($991,256 and $474,499, respectively) and Medicare populations ($13,849,262 and $4,280,291, respectively) in year 1. This decrease was driven by ivabradine’s reduction in hospitalization rates. For the core model, the estimated pharmacy-only PMPM in year 1 was $0.01 for the commercial population and $0.24 for the Medicare Advantage population. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ivabradine to SoC led to lower average annual treatment costs. The negative PMPM budget impact indicates that ivabradine is an affordable option for U.S. payers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10398043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103980432023-08-04 Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States Borer, Jeffrey S. Kansal, Anuraag R. Dorman, Emily D. Krotneva, Stanimira Zheng, Ying Patel, Harshali K. Tavazzi, Luigi Komajda, Michel Ford, Ian Böhm, Michael Kielhorn, Adrian J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) costs $21 billion annually in direct health care costs, 80% of which is directly attributable to hospitalizations. The SHIFT clinical study demonstrated that ivabradine plus standard of care (SoC) reduced HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations compared with SoC alone. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact of ivabradine from a U.S. commercial payer perspective. METHODS: A budget impact model estimated the per-member-per month (PMPM) impact of introducing ivabradine to existing formularies by comparing a reference scenario (SoC) and a new drug scenario (ivabradine + SoC) in hypothetical 1 million-member commercial and Medicare Advantage plans. In both scenarios, U.S. claims data were used for the reference cumulative annual rates of hospitalizations (HF, non-HF cardiovascular [CV], and non-CV), and hospitalization rates were adjusted using SHIFT data. The model controlled for mortality risk using SHIFT and U.S. life table data, and hospitalization costs were obtained from U.S. claims data: HF-related = $37,507; non-HF CV = $28,951; and non-CV = $17,904. The annualized wholesale acquisition cost of ivabradine was $4,500, with baseline use for this new drug at 2%, increasing 2% per year. RESULTS: Based on the approved U.S. indication, approximately 2,000 commercially insured patients from a 1 million-member commercial plan were eligible to receive ivabradine. Ivabradine resulted in a PMPM cost savings of $0.01 and $0.04 in years 1 and 3 of the core model, respectively. After including the acquisition price for ivabradine, the model showed a decrease in total costs in the commercial ($991,256 and $474,499, respectively) and Medicare populations ($13,849,262 and $4,280,291, respectively) in year 1. This decrease was driven by ivabradine’s reduction in hospitalization rates. For the core model, the estimated pharmacy-only PMPM in year 1 was $0.01 for the commercial population and $0.24 for the Medicare Advantage population. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ivabradine to SoC led to lower average annual treatment costs. The negative PMPM budget impact indicates that ivabradine is an affordable option for U.S. payers. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10398043/ /pubmed/27579829 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.9.1064 Text en © 2016, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Borer, Jeffrey S.
Kansal, Anuraag R.
Dorman, Emily D.
Krotneva, Stanimira
Zheng, Ying
Patel, Harshali K.
Tavazzi, Luigi
Komajda, Michel
Ford, Ian
Böhm, Michael
Kielhorn, Adrian
Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States
title Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States
title_full Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States
title_fullStr Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States
title_short Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States
title_sort budget impact of adding ivabradine to standard of care in patients with chronic systolic heart failure in the united states
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579829
http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.9.1064
work_keys_str_mv AT borerjeffreys budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates
AT kansalanuraagr budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates
AT dormanemilyd budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates
AT krotnevastanimira budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates
AT zhengying budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates
AT patelharshalik budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates
AT tavazziluigi budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates
AT komajdamichel budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates
AT fordian budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates
AT bohmmichael budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates
AT kielhornadrian budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates