Cargando…
Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) costs $21 billion annually in direct health care costs, 80% of which is directly attributable to hospitalizations. The SHIFT clinical study demonstrated that ivabradine plus standard of care (SoC) reduced HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations compared with SoC alon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579829 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.9.1064 |
_version_ | 1785084002357477376 |
---|---|
author | Borer, Jeffrey S. Kansal, Anuraag R. Dorman, Emily D. Krotneva, Stanimira Zheng, Ying Patel, Harshali K. Tavazzi, Luigi Komajda, Michel Ford, Ian Böhm, Michael Kielhorn, Adrian |
author_facet | Borer, Jeffrey S. Kansal, Anuraag R. Dorman, Emily D. Krotneva, Stanimira Zheng, Ying Patel, Harshali K. Tavazzi, Luigi Komajda, Michel Ford, Ian Böhm, Michael Kielhorn, Adrian |
author_sort | Borer, Jeffrey S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) costs $21 billion annually in direct health care costs, 80% of which is directly attributable to hospitalizations. The SHIFT clinical study demonstrated that ivabradine plus standard of care (SoC) reduced HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations compared with SoC alone. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact of ivabradine from a U.S. commercial payer perspective. METHODS: A budget impact model estimated the per-member-per month (PMPM) impact of introducing ivabradine to existing formularies by comparing a reference scenario (SoC) and a new drug scenario (ivabradine + SoC) in hypothetical 1 million-member commercial and Medicare Advantage plans. In both scenarios, U.S. claims data were used for the reference cumulative annual rates of hospitalizations (HF, non-HF cardiovascular [CV], and non-CV), and hospitalization rates were adjusted using SHIFT data. The model controlled for mortality risk using SHIFT and U.S. life table data, and hospitalization costs were obtained from U.S. claims data: HF-related = $37,507; non-HF CV = $28,951; and non-CV = $17,904. The annualized wholesale acquisition cost of ivabradine was $4,500, with baseline use for this new drug at 2%, increasing 2% per year. RESULTS: Based on the approved U.S. indication, approximately 2,000 commercially insured patients from a 1 million-member commercial plan were eligible to receive ivabradine. Ivabradine resulted in a PMPM cost savings of $0.01 and $0.04 in years 1 and 3 of the core model, respectively. After including the acquisition price for ivabradine, the model showed a decrease in total costs in the commercial ($991,256 and $474,499, respectively) and Medicare populations ($13,849,262 and $4,280,291, respectively) in year 1. This decrease was driven by ivabradine’s reduction in hospitalization rates. For the core model, the estimated pharmacy-only PMPM in year 1 was $0.01 for the commercial population and $0.24 for the Medicare Advantage population. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ivabradine to SoC led to lower average annual treatment costs. The negative PMPM budget impact indicates that ivabradine is an affordable option for U.S. payers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10398043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103980432023-08-04 Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States Borer, Jeffrey S. Kansal, Anuraag R. Dorman, Emily D. Krotneva, Stanimira Zheng, Ying Patel, Harshali K. Tavazzi, Luigi Komajda, Michel Ford, Ian Böhm, Michael Kielhorn, Adrian J Manag Care Spec Pharm Research BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) costs $21 billion annually in direct health care costs, 80% of which is directly attributable to hospitalizations. The SHIFT clinical study demonstrated that ivabradine plus standard of care (SoC) reduced HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations compared with SoC alone. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact of ivabradine from a U.S. commercial payer perspective. METHODS: A budget impact model estimated the per-member-per month (PMPM) impact of introducing ivabradine to existing formularies by comparing a reference scenario (SoC) and a new drug scenario (ivabradine + SoC) in hypothetical 1 million-member commercial and Medicare Advantage plans. In both scenarios, U.S. claims data were used for the reference cumulative annual rates of hospitalizations (HF, non-HF cardiovascular [CV], and non-CV), and hospitalization rates were adjusted using SHIFT data. The model controlled for mortality risk using SHIFT and U.S. life table data, and hospitalization costs were obtained from U.S. claims data: HF-related = $37,507; non-HF CV = $28,951; and non-CV = $17,904. The annualized wholesale acquisition cost of ivabradine was $4,500, with baseline use for this new drug at 2%, increasing 2% per year. RESULTS: Based on the approved U.S. indication, approximately 2,000 commercially insured patients from a 1 million-member commercial plan were eligible to receive ivabradine. Ivabradine resulted in a PMPM cost savings of $0.01 and $0.04 in years 1 and 3 of the core model, respectively. After including the acquisition price for ivabradine, the model showed a decrease in total costs in the commercial ($991,256 and $474,499, respectively) and Medicare populations ($13,849,262 and $4,280,291, respectively) in year 1. This decrease was driven by ivabradine’s reduction in hospitalization rates. For the core model, the estimated pharmacy-only PMPM in year 1 was $0.01 for the commercial population and $0.24 for the Medicare Advantage population. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ivabradine to SoC led to lower average annual treatment costs. The negative PMPM budget impact indicates that ivabradine is an affordable option for U.S. payers. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10398043/ /pubmed/27579829 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.9.1064 Text en © 2016, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Borer, Jeffrey S. Kansal, Anuraag R. Dorman, Emily D. Krotneva, Stanimira Zheng, Ying Patel, Harshali K. Tavazzi, Luigi Komajda, Michel Ford, Ian Böhm, Michael Kielhorn, Adrian Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States |
title | Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States |
title_full | Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States |
title_fullStr | Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States |
title_short | Budget Impact of Adding Ivabradine to Standard of Care in Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in the United States |
title_sort | budget impact of adding ivabradine to standard of care in patients with chronic systolic heart failure in the united states |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579829 http://dx.doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.9.1064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borerjeffreys budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates AT kansalanuraagr budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates AT dormanemilyd budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates AT krotnevastanimira budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates AT zhengying budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates AT patelharshalik budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates AT tavazziluigi budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates AT komajdamichel budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates AT fordian budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates AT bohmmichael budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates AT kielhornadrian budgetimpactofaddingivabradinetostandardofcareinpatientswithchronicsystolicheartfailureintheunitedstates |