Cargando…

Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study

Radiation therapy (RT) is typically applied using one of two standard approaches for preoperative treatment of resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): short-course RT (SC-RT) alone or long-course RT (LC-RT) with concurrent fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The Phase II single-arm KROG 11-0...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SENYUREK, SUKRAN, SAGLAM, SEZER, SAGLAM, ESRA KAYTAN, YANAR, HAKAN, GOK, KAAN, TASTEKIN, DIDEM, AKBAS, CANAN KOKSAL, SAKIN, NERGIZ DAGOGLU, KARTAL, GULBIZ DAGOGLU, BALIK, EMRE, KESKIN, METIN, SANLI, YASEMIN, GULLUOGLU, MINE, AKGUN, ZULEYHA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tech Science Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547762
http://dx.doi.org/10.32604/or.2023.030351
_version_ 1785084045984530432
author SENYUREK, SUKRAN
SAGLAM, SEZER
SAGLAM, ESRA KAYTAN
YANAR, HAKAN
GOK, KAAN
TASTEKIN, DIDEM
AKBAS, CANAN KOKSAL
SAKIN, NERGIZ DAGOGLU
KARTAL, GULBIZ DAGOGLU
BALIK, EMRE
KESKIN, METIN
SANLI, YASEMIN
GULLUOGLU, MINE
AKGUN, ZULEYHA
author_facet SENYUREK, SUKRAN
SAGLAM, SEZER
SAGLAM, ESRA KAYTAN
YANAR, HAKAN
GOK, KAAN
TASTEKIN, DIDEM
AKBAS, CANAN KOKSAL
SAKIN, NERGIZ DAGOGLU
KARTAL, GULBIZ DAGOGLU
BALIK, EMRE
KESKIN, METIN
SANLI, YASEMIN
GULLUOGLU, MINE
AKGUN, ZULEYHA
author_sort SENYUREK, SUKRAN
collection PubMed
description Radiation therapy (RT) is typically applied using one of two standard approaches for preoperative treatment of resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): short-course RT (SC-RT) alone or long-course RT (LC-RT) with concurrent fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The Phase II single-arm KROG 11-02 study using intermediate-course (IC) (33 Gy (Gray)/10 fr (fraction) with concurrent capecitabine) preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) demonstrated a pathologically complete response rate and a sphincter-sparing rate that were close to those of LC-CRT. The current trial aim to compare the pathological/oncological outcomes, toxicity, and quality of life results of LC-CRT and IC-CRT in cases of LARC. The prescribed dose was 33 Gy/10 fr for the IC-CRT group and 50.4 Gy/28 fr for the LC-CRT group. Concurrent chronomodulated capecitabine (Brunch regimen) 1650 mg/m(2)/daily chemotherapy treatment was applied in both groups. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-CR29) was administered at baseline and at three and six months after CRT. A total of 60 patients with LARC randomized to receive IC-CRT (n = 30) or LC-CRT (n = 30) were included in this phase II randomized trial. No significant difference was noted between groups in terms of pathological outcomes, including pathological response rates (ypT0N0-complete response: 23.3% vs. 16.7%, respectively, and ypT0-2N0-downstaging: 50% for each; p = 0.809) and Dworak score-based pathological tumor regression grade (Grade 4-complete response: 23.3 vs. 16.7%, p = 0.839). The 5-year overall survival (73.3 vs. 86.7%, p = 0.173) rate was also similar. The acute radiation dermatitis (p < 0.001) and any hematological toxicity (p = 0.004) rates were significantly higher in the LC-CRT group, while no significant difference was noted between treatment groups in terms of baseline, third month, and sixth month EORTC QLQ-CR29 scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10398395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Tech Science Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103983952023-08-04 Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study SENYUREK, SUKRAN SAGLAM, SEZER SAGLAM, ESRA KAYTAN YANAR, HAKAN GOK, KAAN TASTEKIN, DIDEM AKBAS, CANAN KOKSAL SAKIN, NERGIZ DAGOGLU KARTAL, GULBIZ DAGOGLU BALIK, EMRE KESKIN, METIN SANLI, YASEMIN GULLUOGLU, MINE AKGUN, ZULEYHA Oncol Res Article Radiation therapy (RT) is typically applied using one of two standard approaches for preoperative treatment of resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): short-course RT (SC-RT) alone or long-course RT (LC-RT) with concurrent fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The Phase II single-arm KROG 11-02 study using intermediate-course (IC) (33 Gy (Gray)/10 fr (fraction) with concurrent capecitabine) preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) demonstrated a pathologically complete response rate and a sphincter-sparing rate that were close to those of LC-CRT. The current trial aim to compare the pathological/oncological outcomes, toxicity, and quality of life results of LC-CRT and IC-CRT in cases of LARC. The prescribed dose was 33 Gy/10 fr for the IC-CRT group and 50.4 Gy/28 fr for the LC-CRT group. Concurrent chronomodulated capecitabine (Brunch regimen) 1650 mg/m(2)/daily chemotherapy treatment was applied in both groups. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-CR29) was administered at baseline and at three and six months after CRT. A total of 60 patients with LARC randomized to receive IC-CRT (n = 30) or LC-CRT (n = 30) were included in this phase II randomized trial. No significant difference was noted between groups in terms of pathological outcomes, including pathological response rates (ypT0N0-complete response: 23.3% vs. 16.7%, respectively, and ypT0-2N0-downstaging: 50% for each; p = 0.809) and Dworak score-based pathological tumor regression grade (Grade 4-complete response: 23.3 vs. 16.7%, p = 0.839). The 5-year overall survival (73.3 vs. 86.7%, p = 0.173) rate was also similar. The acute radiation dermatitis (p < 0.001) and any hematological toxicity (p = 0.004) rates were significantly higher in the LC-CRT group, while no significant difference was noted between treatment groups in terms of baseline, third month, and sixth month EORTC QLQ-CR29 scores. Tech Science Press 2023-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10398395/ /pubmed/37547762 http://dx.doi.org/10.32604/or.2023.030351 Text en © 2023 Senyurek et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
SENYUREK, SUKRAN
SAGLAM, SEZER
SAGLAM, ESRA KAYTAN
YANAR, HAKAN
GOK, KAAN
TASTEKIN, DIDEM
AKBAS, CANAN KOKSAL
SAKIN, NERGIZ DAGOGLU
KARTAL, GULBIZ DAGOGLU
BALIK, EMRE
KESKIN, METIN
SANLI, YASEMIN
GULLUOGLU, MINE
AKGUN, ZULEYHA
Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study
title Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study
title_full Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study
title_short Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study
title_sort neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in t3-4/n0+ rectal cancer: istanbul r-02 phase ii randomized study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547762
http://dx.doi.org/10.32604/or.2023.030351
work_keys_str_mv AT senyureksukran neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT saglamsezer neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT saglamesrakaytan neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT yanarhakan neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT gokkaan neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT tastekindidem neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT akbascanankoksal neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT sakinnergizdagoglu neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT kartalgulbizdagoglu neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT balikemre neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT keskinmetin neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT sanliyasemin neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT gulluoglumine neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy
AT akgunzuleyha neoadjuvantintermediatecourseversuslongcoursechemoradiotherapyint34n0rectalcanceristanbulr02phaseiirandomizedstudy