Cargando…

Were cancer patients worse off than the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic? A population-based study from Norway, Denmark and Iceland during the pre-vaccination era

BACKGROUND: In a population-based setting, we investigated the risks of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and developing severe COVID-19 outcomes among cancer patients compared with the general population. METHODS: In nationwide cohorts, we identified all individuals in Norway, Denmark and Iceland who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johansson, Anna L.V., Skog, Anna, Johannesen, Tom Børge, Myklebust, Tor Åge, Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel, Mørch, Lina Steinrud, Friis, Søren, Gamborg, Mads, Kristiansen, Marnar Fríðheim, Pettersson, David, Ólafsdóttir, Elínborg J., Birgisson, Helgi, Palsson, Runolfur, Eythorsson, Elias, Irenaeus, Sandra, Lambe, Mats, Ursin, Giske
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100680
_version_ 1785084087080321024
author Johansson, Anna L.V.
Skog, Anna
Johannesen, Tom Børge
Myklebust, Tor Åge
Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel
Mørch, Lina Steinrud
Friis, Søren
Gamborg, Mads
Kristiansen, Marnar Fríðheim
Pettersson, David
Ólafsdóttir, Elínborg J.
Birgisson, Helgi
Palsson, Runolfur
Eythorsson, Elias
Irenaeus, Sandra
Lambe, Mats
Ursin, Giske
author_facet Johansson, Anna L.V.
Skog, Anna
Johannesen, Tom Børge
Myklebust, Tor Åge
Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel
Mørch, Lina Steinrud
Friis, Søren
Gamborg, Mads
Kristiansen, Marnar Fríðheim
Pettersson, David
Ólafsdóttir, Elínborg J.
Birgisson, Helgi
Palsson, Runolfur
Eythorsson, Elias
Irenaeus, Sandra
Lambe, Mats
Ursin, Giske
author_sort Johansson, Anna L.V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a population-based setting, we investigated the risks of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and developing severe COVID-19 outcomes among cancer patients compared with the general population. METHODS: In nationwide cohorts, we identified all individuals in Norway, Denmark and Iceland who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 or had a severe COVID-19 outcome (hospitalisation, intensive care, and death) from March until December 2020, using data from national health registries. We estimated standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing cancer patients with the general population. FINDINGS: During the first wave of the pandemic, cancer patients in Norway and Denmark had higher risks of testing SARS-CoV-2 positive compared to the general population. Throughout 2020, recently treated cancer patients were more likely to test SARS-CoV-2 positive. In Iceland, cancer patients experienced no increased risk of testing positive. The risk of COVID-19-related hospitalisation was higher among cancer patients diagnosed within one year of hospitalisation (Norway: SIR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.89–3.09; Denmark: 2.23, 1.96–2.54) and within five years (Norway: 1.58, 1.35–1.83; Denmark: 1.54, 1.42–1.66). Risks were higher in recently treated cancer patients and in those diagnosed with haematologic malignancies, colorectal or lung cancer. Risks of COVID-19-related intensive care and death were higher among cancer patients. INTERPRETATION: Cancer patients were at increased risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the first pandemic wave when testing availability was limited, while relative risks of severe COVID-19 outcomes remained increased in cancer patients throughout 2020. Recent cancer treatment and haematologic malignancy were the strongest risk factors. FUNDING: Nordic Cancer Union.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10398597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103985972023-08-04 Were cancer patients worse off than the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic? A population-based study from Norway, Denmark and Iceland during the pre-vaccination era Johansson, Anna L.V. Skog, Anna Johannesen, Tom Børge Myklebust, Tor Åge Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel Mørch, Lina Steinrud Friis, Søren Gamborg, Mads Kristiansen, Marnar Fríðheim Pettersson, David Ólafsdóttir, Elínborg J. Birgisson, Helgi Palsson, Runolfur Eythorsson, Elias Irenaeus, Sandra Lambe, Mats Ursin, Giske Lancet Reg Health Eur Articles BACKGROUND: In a population-based setting, we investigated the risks of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and developing severe COVID-19 outcomes among cancer patients compared with the general population. METHODS: In nationwide cohorts, we identified all individuals in Norway, Denmark and Iceland who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 or had a severe COVID-19 outcome (hospitalisation, intensive care, and death) from March until December 2020, using data from national health registries. We estimated standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing cancer patients with the general population. FINDINGS: During the first wave of the pandemic, cancer patients in Norway and Denmark had higher risks of testing SARS-CoV-2 positive compared to the general population. Throughout 2020, recently treated cancer patients were more likely to test SARS-CoV-2 positive. In Iceland, cancer patients experienced no increased risk of testing positive. The risk of COVID-19-related hospitalisation was higher among cancer patients diagnosed within one year of hospitalisation (Norway: SIR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.89–3.09; Denmark: 2.23, 1.96–2.54) and within five years (Norway: 1.58, 1.35–1.83; Denmark: 1.54, 1.42–1.66). Risks were higher in recently treated cancer patients and in those diagnosed with haematologic malignancies, colorectal or lung cancer. Risks of COVID-19-related intensive care and death were higher among cancer patients. INTERPRETATION: Cancer patients were at increased risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the first pandemic wave when testing availability was limited, while relative risks of severe COVID-19 outcomes remained increased in cancer patients throughout 2020. Recent cancer treatment and haematologic malignancy were the strongest risk factors. FUNDING: Nordic Cancer Union. Elsevier 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10398597/ /pubmed/37547277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100680 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Johansson, Anna L.V.
Skog, Anna
Johannesen, Tom Børge
Myklebust, Tor Åge
Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel
Mørch, Lina Steinrud
Friis, Søren
Gamborg, Mads
Kristiansen, Marnar Fríðheim
Pettersson, David
Ólafsdóttir, Elínborg J.
Birgisson, Helgi
Palsson, Runolfur
Eythorsson, Elias
Irenaeus, Sandra
Lambe, Mats
Ursin, Giske
Were cancer patients worse off than the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic? A population-based study from Norway, Denmark and Iceland during the pre-vaccination era
title Were cancer patients worse off than the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic? A population-based study from Norway, Denmark and Iceland during the pre-vaccination era
title_full Were cancer patients worse off than the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic? A population-based study from Norway, Denmark and Iceland during the pre-vaccination era
title_fullStr Were cancer patients worse off than the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic? A population-based study from Norway, Denmark and Iceland during the pre-vaccination era
title_full_unstemmed Were cancer patients worse off than the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic? A population-based study from Norway, Denmark and Iceland during the pre-vaccination era
title_short Were cancer patients worse off than the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic? A population-based study from Norway, Denmark and Iceland during the pre-vaccination era
title_sort were cancer patients worse off than the general population during the covid-19 pandemic? a population-based study from norway, denmark and iceland during the pre-vaccination era
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100680
work_keys_str_mv AT johanssonannalv werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT skoganna werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT johannesentombørge werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT myklebusttorage werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT skovlundcharlottewessel werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT mørchlinasteinrud werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT friissøren werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT gamborgmads werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT kristiansenmarnarfriðheim werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT petterssondavid werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT olafsdottirelinborgj werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT birgissonhelgi werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT palssonrunolfur werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT eythorssonelias werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT irenaeussandra werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT lambemats werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera
AT ursingiske werecancerpatientsworseoffthanthegeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemicapopulationbasedstudyfromnorwaydenmarkandicelandduringtheprevaccinationera