Cargando…

Real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA: results from the COURAGE Study

BACKGROUND: Individuals using onabotulinumtoxinA as a preventive migraine treatment often use acute treatments for breakthrough attacks. Data on real-world effectiveness of the small-molecule calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist ubrogepant in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manack Adams, Aubrey, Hutchinson, Susan, Engstrom, Ella, Ayasse, Nicolai D., Serrano, Daniel, Davis, Linda, Sommer, Katherine, Contreras-De Lama, Janette, Lipton, Richard B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01622-0
_version_ 1785084158250319872
author Manack Adams, Aubrey
Hutchinson, Susan
Engstrom, Ella
Ayasse, Nicolai D.
Serrano, Daniel
Davis, Linda
Sommer, Katherine
Contreras-De Lama, Janette
Lipton, Richard B.
author_facet Manack Adams, Aubrey
Hutchinson, Susan
Engstrom, Ella
Ayasse, Nicolai D.
Serrano, Daniel
Davis, Linda
Sommer, Katherine
Contreras-De Lama, Janette
Lipton, Richard B.
author_sort Manack Adams, Aubrey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals using onabotulinumtoxinA as a preventive migraine treatment often use acute treatments for breakthrough attacks. Data on real-world effectiveness of the small-molecule calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist ubrogepant in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA are limited. METHODS: COURAGE, a prospective, multiple attack, observational study, evaluated the real-world effectiveness of ubrogepant (50 or 100 mg) for acute treatment of migraine in people receiving onabotulinumtoxinA, an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody (mAb), or both. This analysis focused only on onabotulinumtoxinA users. The Migraine Buddy app was used to identify eligible participants and track response to treated attacks. For each ubrogepant-treated attack, meaningful pain relief (MPR) and return to normal function (RNF) at 2 and 4 h post-dose over 30 days was assessed. MPR was defined as a level of relief that is meaningful to the participant, usually occurring before the pain is all gone. After 30 days, satisfaction was reported on a 7-point scale and overall acute treatment optimization was evaluated using the migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire-4 (mTOQ-4). RESULTS: This analysis included 122 participants who received ubrogepant and onabotulinumtoxinA and reported on 599 ubrogepant-treated attacks. Following the first ubrogepant-treated attack, MPR was achieved in 53.3% of participants 2 h post-dose and in 76.2% of participants 4 h post-dose. RNF was achieved in 25.4% of participants 2 h post-dose and in 45.9% of participants 4 h post-dose. MPR and RNF results were similar across up to 10 ubrogepant-treated attacks. After 30 days, satisfaction with ubrogepant in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA was reported by 69.8% of participants and acute treatment optimization (defined as mTOQ-4 score ≥ 4) was achieved in 77.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective real-world effectiveness study, ubrogepant treatment in onabotulinumtoxinA users with self-identified migraine was associated with high rates of MPR and RNF at 2 and 4 h as well as satisfaction and acute treatment optimization. Although the lack of a contemporaneous control group limits causal inference, these findings demonstrate the feasibility of using a novel, app-based design to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and satisfaction of treatments. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01622-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10399003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103990032023-08-04 Real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA: results from the COURAGE Study Manack Adams, Aubrey Hutchinson, Susan Engstrom, Ella Ayasse, Nicolai D. Serrano, Daniel Davis, Linda Sommer, Katherine Contreras-De Lama, Janette Lipton, Richard B. J Headache Pain Research BACKGROUND: Individuals using onabotulinumtoxinA as a preventive migraine treatment often use acute treatments for breakthrough attacks. Data on real-world effectiveness of the small-molecule calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist ubrogepant in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA are limited. METHODS: COURAGE, a prospective, multiple attack, observational study, evaluated the real-world effectiveness of ubrogepant (50 or 100 mg) for acute treatment of migraine in people receiving onabotulinumtoxinA, an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody (mAb), or both. This analysis focused only on onabotulinumtoxinA users. The Migraine Buddy app was used to identify eligible participants and track response to treated attacks. For each ubrogepant-treated attack, meaningful pain relief (MPR) and return to normal function (RNF) at 2 and 4 h post-dose over 30 days was assessed. MPR was defined as a level of relief that is meaningful to the participant, usually occurring before the pain is all gone. After 30 days, satisfaction was reported on a 7-point scale and overall acute treatment optimization was evaluated using the migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire-4 (mTOQ-4). RESULTS: This analysis included 122 participants who received ubrogepant and onabotulinumtoxinA and reported on 599 ubrogepant-treated attacks. Following the first ubrogepant-treated attack, MPR was achieved in 53.3% of participants 2 h post-dose and in 76.2% of participants 4 h post-dose. RNF was achieved in 25.4% of participants 2 h post-dose and in 45.9% of participants 4 h post-dose. MPR and RNF results were similar across up to 10 ubrogepant-treated attacks. After 30 days, satisfaction with ubrogepant in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA was reported by 69.8% of participants and acute treatment optimization (defined as mTOQ-4 score ≥ 4) was achieved in 77.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective real-world effectiveness study, ubrogepant treatment in onabotulinumtoxinA users with self-identified migraine was associated with high rates of MPR and RNF at 2 and 4 h as well as satisfaction and acute treatment optimization. Although the lack of a contemporaneous control group limits causal inference, these findings demonstrate the feasibility of using a novel, app-based design to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and satisfaction of treatments. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01622-0. Springer Milan 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10399003/ /pubmed/37537578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01622-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Manack Adams, Aubrey
Hutchinson, Susan
Engstrom, Ella
Ayasse, Nicolai D.
Serrano, Daniel
Davis, Linda
Sommer, Katherine
Contreras-De Lama, Janette
Lipton, Richard B.
Real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA: results from the COURAGE Study
title Real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA: results from the COURAGE Study
title_full Real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA: results from the COURAGE Study
title_fullStr Real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA: results from the COURAGE Study
title_full_unstemmed Real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA: results from the COURAGE Study
title_short Real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxinA: results from the COURAGE Study
title_sort real-world effectiveness, satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in combination with onabotulinumtoxina: results from the courage study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01622-0
work_keys_str_mv AT manackadamsaubrey realworldeffectivenesssatisfactionandoptimizationofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineincombinationwithonabotulinumtoxinaresultsfromthecouragestudy
AT hutchinsonsusan realworldeffectivenesssatisfactionandoptimizationofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineincombinationwithonabotulinumtoxinaresultsfromthecouragestudy
AT engstromella realworldeffectivenesssatisfactionandoptimizationofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineincombinationwithonabotulinumtoxinaresultsfromthecouragestudy
AT ayassenicolaid realworldeffectivenesssatisfactionandoptimizationofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineincombinationwithonabotulinumtoxinaresultsfromthecouragestudy
AT serranodaniel realworldeffectivenesssatisfactionandoptimizationofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineincombinationwithonabotulinumtoxinaresultsfromthecouragestudy
AT davislinda realworldeffectivenesssatisfactionandoptimizationofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineincombinationwithonabotulinumtoxinaresultsfromthecouragestudy
AT sommerkatherine realworldeffectivenesssatisfactionandoptimizationofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineincombinationwithonabotulinumtoxinaresultsfromthecouragestudy
AT contrerasdelamajanette realworldeffectivenesssatisfactionandoptimizationofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineincombinationwithonabotulinumtoxinaresultsfromthecouragestudy
AT liptonrichardb realworldeffectivenesssatisfactionandoptimizationofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineincombinationwithonabotulinumtoxinaresultsfromthecouragestudy