Cargando…

The time interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and frozen-thawed embryo transfer does not affect the reproductive outcomes

BACKGROUND: Hydrosalpinx may decrease implantation and pregnancy rates after embryo transfer. Laparoscopic tubal ligation after embryo freeze and before frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is effective at improving reproductive outcomes for hydrosalpinx patients. This study is to find out the optima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Lijuan, Li, Xiaojuan, Shi, Juanzi, Duan, Haixia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05880-3
_version_ 1785084189424484352
author Fan, Lijuan
Li, Xiaojuan
Shi, Juanzi
Duan, Haixia
author_facet Fan, Lijuan
Li, Xiaojuan
Shi, Juanzi
Duan, Haixia
author_sort Fan, Lijuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hydrosalpinx may decrease implantation and pregnancy rates after embryo transfer. Laparoscopic tubal ligation after embryo freeze and before frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is effective at improving reproductive outcomes for hydrosalpinx patients. This study is to find out the optimal interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and FET. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 259 infertile women who performed laparoscopic tubal ligation for embryo freeze and FET. Participants were divided into three groups, based on the interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and FET. Group I: <30 days; Group II: 31– 60 days; Group III: >60 days. Outcomes of cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryo FET were analyzed respectively. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate among the three groups, in both cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryo FET cycles. In cleavage-stage embryo FET cycle, singleton gestational age was significantly younger in group III (38.11 ± 2.28 weeks) compared with group I (39.29 ± 1.06 weeks, P = 0.001) and group II (38.96 ± 1.05, P = 0.026). Singleton birth weight was significantly heavier in group II (3.65 ± 0.32 Kg) compared with group I (3.38 ± 0.29 Kg, P = 0.001) and group III (3.35 ± 0.60 Kg, P = 0.004). Twin birth weight was significantly heavier in group III (2.72 ± 0.43 Kg) compared to group I (2.23 ± 0.67 Kg, P = 0.002). In blastocyst-stage embryo FET cycles, twin gestational age was significantly younger in group II (34.07 ± 3.18 weeks) compared with group I (35.56 ± 2.27 weeks, P = 0.049) and group III (36.50 ± 1.47 weeks, P = 0.005). Twin birth weight was significantly heavier in group III (2.71 ± 0.39 Kg) compared to group II (2.39 ± 0.67 Kg, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The duration of the interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and FET does not affect the reproductive outcomes; however, it may affect the neonate outcomes to some extent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10399055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103990552023-08-04 The time interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and frozen-thawed embryo transfer does not affect the reproductive outcomes Fan, Lijuan Li, Xiaojuan Shi, Juanzi Duan, Haixia BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Hydrosalpinx may decrease implantation and pregnancy rates after embryo transfer. Laparoscopic tubal ligation after embryo freeze and before frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is effective at improving reproductive outcomes for hydrosalpinx patients. This study is to find out the optimal interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and FET. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 259 infertile women who performed laparoscopic tubal ligation for embryo freeze and FET. Participants were divided into three groups, based on the interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and FET. Group I: <30 days; Group II: 31– 60 days; Group III: >60 days. Outcomes of cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryo FET were analyzed respectively. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and preterm birth rate among the three groups, in both cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryo FET cycles. In cleavage-stage embryo FET cycle, singleton gestational age was significantly younger in group III (38.11 ± 2.28 weeks) compared with group I (39.29 ± 1.06 weeks, P = 0.001) and group II (38.96 ± 1.05, P = 0.026). Singleton birth weight was significantly heavier in group II (3.65 ± 0.32 Kg) compared with group I (3.38 ± 0.29 Kg, P = 0.001) and group III (3.35 ± 0.60 Kg, P = 0.004). Twin birth weight was significantly heavier in group III (2.72 ± 0.43 Kg) compared to group I (2.23 ± 0.67 Kg, P = 0.002). In blastocyst-stage embryo FET cycles, twin gestational age was significantly younger in group II (34.07 ± 3.18 weeks) compared with group I (35.56 ± 2.27 weeks, P = 0.049) and group III (36.50 ± 1.47 weeks, P = 0.005). Twin birth weight was significantly heavier in group III (2.71 ± 0.39 Kg) compared to group II (2.39 ± 0.67 Kg, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The duration of the interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and FET does not affect the reproductive outcomes; however, it may affect the neonate outcomes to some extent. BioMed Central 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10399055/ /pubmed/37537525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05880-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fan, Lijuan
Li, Xiaojuan
Shi, Juanzi
Duan, Haixia
The time interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and frozen-thawed embryo transfer does not affect the reproductive outcomes
title The time interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and frozen-thawed embryo transfer does not affect the reproductive outcomes
title_full The time interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and frozen-thawed embryo transfer does not affect the reproductive outcomes
title_fullStr The time interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and frozen-thawed embryo transfer does not affect the reproductive outcomes
title_full_unstemmed The time interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and frozen-thawed embryo transfer does not affect the reproductive outcomes
title_short The time interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and frozen-thawed embryo transfer does not affect the reproductive outcomes
title_sort time interval between laparoscopic tubal ligation and frozen-thawed embryo transfer does not affect the reproductive outcomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05880-3
work_keys_str_mv AT fanlijuan thetimeintervalbetweenlaparoscopictuballigationandfrozenthawedembryotransferdoesnotaffectthereproductiveoutcomes
AT lixiaojuan thetimeintervalbetweenlaparoscopictuballigationandfrozenthawedembryotransferdoesnotaffectthereproductiveoutcomes
AT shijuanzi thetimeintervalbetweenlaparoscopictuballigationandfrozenthawedembryotransferdoesnotaffectthereproductiveoutcomes
AT duanhaixia thetimeintervalbetweenlaparoscopictuballigationandfrozenthawedembryotransferdoesnotaffectthereproductiveoutcomes
AT fanlijuan timeintervalbetweenlaparoscopictuballigationandfrozenthawedembryotransferdoesnotaffectthereproductiveoutcomes
AT lixiaojuan timeintervalbetweenlaparoscopictuballigationandfrozenthawedembryotransferdoesnotaffectthereproductiveoutcomes
AT shijuanzi timeintervalbetweenlaparoscopictuballigationandfrozenthawedembryotransferdoesnotaffectthereproductiveoutcomes
AT duanhaixia timeintervalbetweenlaparoscopictuballigationandfrozenthawedembryotransferdoesnotaffectthereproductiveoutcomes