Cargando…

Bulbar involvement and cognitive features in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a retrospective study on 347 patients

BACKGROUND: This study aimed at clarifying the role of bulbar involvement (BI) as a risk factor for cognitive impairment (CI) in non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. METHODS: Data on N = 347 patients were retrospectively collected. Cognition was assessed via the Edinburgh Cogni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aiello, Edoardo Nicolò, Solca, Federica, Torre, Silvia, Patisso, Valerio, De Lorenzo, Alberto, Treddenti, Mauro, Colombo, Eleonora, Maranzano, Alessio, Morelli, Claudia, Doretti, Alberto, Verde, Federico, Silani, Vincenzo, Ticozzi, Nicola, Poletti, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547740
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1217080
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study aimed at clarifying the role of bulbar involvement (BI) as a risk factor for cognitive impairment (CI) in non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. METHODS: Data on N = 347 patients were retrospectively collected. Cognition was assessed via the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). On the basis of clinical records and ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores, BI was characterized as follows: (1) BI at onset—from medical history; (2) BI at testing (an ALSFRS-R-Bulbar score ≤11); (3) dysarthria (a score ≤3 on item 1 of the ALSFRS-R); (4) severity of BI (the total score on the ALSFRS-R-Bulbar); and (5) progression rate of BI (computed as 12-ALSFRS-R-Bulbar/disease duration in months). Logistic regressions were run to predict a below- vs. above-cutoff performance on each ECAS measure based on BI-related features while accounting for sex, disease duration, severity and progression rate of respiratory and spinal involvement and ECAS response modality. RESULTS: No predictors yielded significance either on the ECAS-Total and -ALS-non-specific or on ECAS-Language/-Fluency or -Visuospatial subscales. BI at testing predicted a higher probability of an abnormal performance on the ECAS-ALS-specific (p = 0.035) and ECAS-Executive Functioning (p = 0.018). Lower ALSFRS-R-Bulbar scores were associated with a defective performance on the ECAS-Memory (p = 0.025). No other BI-related features affected other ECAS performances. DISCUSSION: In ALS, the occurrence of BI itself, while neither its specific features nor its presence at onset, might selectively represent a risk factor for executive impairment, whilst its severity might be associated with memory deficits.