Cargando…

Does green credit really increase green technology innovation?

Considering China's green credit policy (GCP) as a quasi-natural experiment, this study discusses the effect of GCP on enterprise green innovation (GI) using a difference-in-difference method based on data from Chinese listed companies from 2009 to 2020. The results indicate that green credit e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Tao, Wu, Wanwan, Du, Mingyue, Ren, Siyu, Huang, Yangping, Cifuentes-Faura, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504231191985
_version_ 1785084235994890240
author Lin, Tao
Wu, Wanwan
Du, Mingyue
Ren, Siyu
Huang, Yangping
Cifuentes-Faura, Javier
author_facet Lin, Tao
Wu, Wanwan
Du, Mingyue
Ren, Siyu
Huang, Yangping
Cifuentes-Faura, Javier
author_sort Lin, Tao
collection PubMed
description Considering China's green credit policy (GCP) as a quasi-natural experiment, this study discusses the effect of GCP on enterprise green innovation (GI) using a difference-in-difference method based on data from Chinese listed companies from 2009 to 2020. The results indicate that green credit enhances the strategic GI of heavy polluters while significantly inhibiting essential GI, thus suggesting the nonexistence of the Porter effect. In addition, the inhibition effect is attributed to an increase in financing constraints and a reduction in government subsidies, firm research and development investment, and employment scale. This disincentive effect is particularly pronounced in privately owned firms, small cities, and capital-intensive low-profitability firms. Resource misallocation caused by the GCP fails to stimulate the green transformation of heavily polluting industries through the Porter effect. Hence, governments should establish a diversified green financial system, integrate green venture capital and GI elements, and guide the flow of social capital toward green industries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10399269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103992692023-08-09 Does green credit really increase green technology innovation? Lin, Tao Wu, Wanwan Du, Mingyue Ren, Siyu Huang, Yangping Cifuentes-Faura, Javier Sci Prog Ecology & Environmental Sciences Considering China's green credit policy (GCP) as a quasi-natural experiment, this study discusses the effect of GCP on enterprise green innovation (GI) using a difference-in-difference method based on data from Chinese listed companies from 2009 to 2020. The results indicate that green credit enhances the strategic GI of heavy polluters while significantly inhibiting essential GI, thus suggesting the nonexistence of the Porter effect. In addition, the inhibition effect is attributed to an increase in financing constraints and a reduction in government subsidies, firm research and development investment, and employment scale. This disincentive effect is particularly pronounced in privately owned firms, small cities, and capital-intensive low-profitability firms. Resource misallocation caused by the GCP fails to stimulate the green transformation of heavily polluting industries through the Porter effect. Hence, governments should establish a diversified green financial system, integrate green venture capital and GI elements, and guide the flow of social capital toward green industries. SAGE Publications 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10399269/ /pubmed/37528648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504231191985 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Ecology & Environmental Sciences
Lin, Tao
Wu, Wanwan
Du, Mingyue
Ren, Siyu
Huang, Yangping
Cifuentes-Faura, Javier
Does green credit really increase green technology innovation?
title Does green credit really increase green technology innovation?
title_full Does green credit really increase green technology innovation?
title_fullStr Does green credit really increase green technology innovation?
title_full_unstemmed Does green credit really increase green technology innovation?
title_short Does green credit really increase green technology innovation?
title_sort does green credit really increase green technology innovation?
topic Ecology & Environmental Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504231191985
work_keys_str_mv AT lintao doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation
AT wuwanwan doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation
AT dumingyue doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation
AT rensiyu doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation
AT huangyangping doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation
AT cifuentesfaurajavier doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation