Cargando…
Does green credit really increase green technology innovation?
Considering China's green credit policy (GCP) as a quasi-natural experiment, this study discusses the effect of GCP on enterprise green innovation (GI) using a difference-in-difference method based on data from Chinese listed companies from 2009 to 2020. The results indicate that green credit e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504231191985 |
_version_ | 1785084235994890240 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Tao Wu, Wanwan Du, Mingyue Ren, Siyu Huang, Yangping Cifuentes-Faura, Javier |
author_facet | Lin, Tao Wu, Wanwan Du, Mingyue Ren, Siyu Huang, Yangping Cifuentes-Faura, Javier |
author_sort | Lin, Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Considering China's green credit policy (GCP) as a quasi-natural experiment, this study discusses the effect of GCP on enterprise green innovation (GI) using a difference-in-difference method based on data from Chinese listed companies from 2009 to 2020. The results indicate that green credit enhances the strategic GI of heavy polluters while significantly inhibiting essential GI, thus suggesting the nonexistence of the Porter effect. In addition, the inhibition effect is attributed to an increase in financing constraints and a reduction in government subsidies, firm research and development investment, and employment scale. This disincentive effect is particularly pronounced in privately owned firms, small cities, and capital-intensive low-profitability firms. Resource misallocation caused by the GCP fails to stimulate the green transformation of heavily polluting industries through the Porter effect. Hence, governments should establish a diversified green financial system, integrate green venture capital and GI elements, and guide the flow of social capital toward green industries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10399269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103992692023-08-09 Does green credit really increase green technology innovation? Lin, Tao Wu, Wanwan Du, Mingyue Ren, Siyu Huang, Yangping Cifuentes-Faura, Javier Sci Prog Ecology & Environmental Sciences Considering China's green credit policy (GCP) as a quasi-natural experiment, this study discusses the effect of GCP on enterprise green innovation (GI) using a difference-in-difference method based on data from Chinese listed companies from 2009 to 2020. The results indicate that green credit enhances the strategic GI of heavy polluters while significantly inhibiting essential GI, thus suggesting the nonexistence of the Porter effect. In addition, the inhibition effect is attributed to an increase in financing constraints and a reduction in government subsidies, firm research and development investment, and employment scale. This disincentive effect is particularly pronounced in privately owned firms, small cities, and capital-intensive low-profitability firms. Resource misallocation caused by the GCP fails to stimulate the green transformation of heavily polluting industries through the Porter effect. Hence, governments should establish a diversified green financial system, integrate green venture capital and GI elements, and guide the flow of social capital toward green industries. SAGE Publications 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10399269/ /pubmed/37528648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504231191985 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Ecology & Environmental Sciences Lin, Tao Wu, Wanwan Du, Mingyue Ren, Siyu Huang, Yangping Cifuentes-Faura, Javier Does green credit really increase green technology innovation? |
title | Does green credit really increase green technology innovation? |
title_full | Does green credit really increase green technology innovation? |
title_fullStr | Does green credit really increase green technology innovation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does green credit really increase green technology innovation? |
title_short | Does green credit really increase green technology innovation? |
title_sort | does green credit really increase green technology innovation? |
topic | Ecology & Environmental Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504231191985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lintao doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation AT wuwanwan doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation AT dumingyue doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation AT rensiyu doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation AT huangyangping doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation AT cifuentesfaurajavier doesgreencreditreallyincreasegreentechnologyinnovation |