Cargando…

‘It’s not just about me’: a qualitative study of couples’ narratives about home death when one of the partners is dying of cancer

BACKGROUND: Most cancer patients state a preference for home death. Care and support from primary caregivers are important to enable dying at home. A preference for home death from the perspective of couples has rarely been investigated. OBJECTIVES: To explore how a preference for home death is unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aurén-Møkleby, Margareta, Thoresen, Lisbeth, Mengshoel, Anne Marit, Solbrække, Kari N., Aasbø, Gunvor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37545874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231189517
_version_ 1785084236228722688
author Aurén-Møkleby, Margareta
Thoresen, Lisbeth
Mengshoel, Anne Marit
Solbrække, Kari N.
Aasbø, Gunvor
author_facet Aurén-Møkleby, Margareta
Thoresen, Lisbeth
Mengshoel, Anne Marit
Solbrække, Kari N.
Aasbø, Gunvor
author_sort Aurén-Møkleby, Margareta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most cancer patients state a preference for home death. Care and support from primary caregivers are important to enable dying at home. A preference for home death from the perspective of couples has rarely been investigated. OBJECTIVES: To explore how a preference for home death is understood and enacted in couples where one of the partners is dying of cancer. DESIGN: A qualitative interview research design with a narrative approach was used. METHODS: Five couples participated in dyad interviews. During the analysis, two interviews that particularly illuminated couples’ shared and individual views were chosen as the primary cases. RESULTS: The interviews show, in two highly different ways, how a preference for home death is a significant relational matter. The interviews are presented as two cases: ‘Struggles in an Unknown Terrain’ and ‘Reliance at the Kitchen Table’. They show how a preference for home death can be understood and enacted as a struggle or as reliance based on the couple’s shared biography and the partner’s ability to care for the partner during the end-of-life phase. The analysis highlighted the negotiations that underpin a preference for home death. In these negotiations, the couples drew on idealised understandings of home death. These ideas were supported by cultural values related to autonomy and independence as well as participation and citizenship. Thus, in the negotiations about being cared for and caring, legitimate dependency and the maintenance of a reciprocal relationship were balanced. The presence of healthcare professionals and medical devices in the home had to be balanced with the need to maintain a sense of self and an authentic home. CONCLUSION: A relational perspective on a preference for home death made us attentive to couples’ negotiations. These negotiations give couples the opportunity to re-evaluate and reconfirm individual and mutual needs in the end-of-life phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10399270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103992702023-08-04 ‘It’s not just about me’: a qualitative study of couples’ narratives about home death when one of the partners is dying of cancer Aurén-Møkleby, Margareta Thoresen, Lisbeth Mengshoel, Anne Marit Solbrække, Kari N. Aasbø, Gunvor Palliat Care Soc Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: Most cancer patients state a preference for home death. Care and support from primary caregivers are important to enable dying at home. A preference for home death from the perspective of couples has rarely been investigated. OBJECTIVES: To explore how a preference for home death is understood and enacted in couples where one of the partners is dying of cancer. DESIGN: A qualitative interview research design with a narrative approach was used. METHODS: Five couples participated in dyad interviews. During the analysis, two interviews that particularly illuminated couples’ shared and individual views were chosen as the primary cases. RESULTS: The interviews show, in two highly different ways, how a preference for home death is a significant relational matter. The interviews are presented as two cases: ‘Struggles in an Unknown Terrain’ and ‘Reliance at the Kitchen Table’. They show how a preference for home death can be understood and enacted as a struggle or as reliance based on the couple’s shared biography and the partner’s ability to care for the partner during the end-of-life phase. The analysis highlighted the negotiations that underpin a preference for home death. In these negotiations, the couples drew on idealised understandings of home death. These ideas were supported by cultural values related to autonomy and independence as well as participation and citizenship. Thus, in the negotiations about being cared for and caring, legitimate dependency and the maintenance of a reciprocal relationship were balanced. The presence of healthcare professionals and medical devices in the home had to be balanced with the need to maintain a sense of self and an authentic home. CONCLUSION: A relational perspective on a preference for home death made us attentive to couples’ negotiations. These negotiations give couples the opportunity to re-evaluate and reconfirm individual and mutual needs in the end-of-life phase. SAGE Publications 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10399270/ /pubmed/37545874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231189517 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Aurén-Møkleby, Margareta
Thoresen, Lisbeth
Mengshoel, Anne Marit
Solbrække, Kari N.
Aasbø, Gunvor
‘It’s not just about me’: a qualitative study of couples’ narratives about home death when one of the partners is dying of cancer
title ‘It’s not just about me’: a qualitative study of couples’ narratives about home death when one of the partners is dying of cancer
title_full ‘It’s not just about me’: a qualitative study of couples’ narratives about home death when one of the partners is dying of cancer
title_fullStr ‘It’s not just about me’: a qualitative study of couples’ narratives about home death when one of the partners is dying of cancer
title_full_unstemmed ‘It’s not just about me’: a qualitative study of couples’ narratives about home death when one of the partners is dying of cancer
title_short ‘It’s not just about me’: a qualitative study of couples’ narratives about home death when one of the partners is dying of cancer
title_sort ‘it’s not just about me’: a qualitative study of couples’ narratives about home death when one of the partners is dying of cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37545874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231189517
work_keys_str_mv AT aurenmøklebymargareta itsnotjustaboutmeaqualitativestudyofcouplesnarrativesabouthomedeathwhenoneofthepartnersisdyingofcancer
AT thoresenlisbeth itsnotjustaboutmeaqualitativestudyofcouplesnarrativesabouthomedeathwhenoneofthepartnersisdyingofcancer
AT mengshoelannemarit itsnotjustaboutmeaqualitativestudyofcouplesnarrativesabouthomedeathwhenoneofthepartnersisdyingofcancer
AT solbrækkekarin itsnotjustaboutmeaqualitativestudyofcouplesnarrativesabouthomedeathwhenoneofthepartnersisdyingofcancer
AT aasbøgunvor itsnotjustaboutmeaqualitativestudyofcouplesnarrativesabouthomedeathwhenoneofthepartnersisdyingofcancer