Cargando…

Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm

INTRODUCTION: Social psychological research on collective action and intergroup harm has yet to adequately consider the potential role of cancel culture or feelings of collective validation in motivating collective action. The current research will begin to fill this gap and may broaden our understa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Traversa, Marissa, Tian, Ying, Wright, Stephen C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546434
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181872
_version_ 1785084299581587456
author Traversa, Marissa
Tian, Ying
Wright, Stephen C.
author_facet Traversa, Marissa
Tian, Ying
Wright, Stephen C.
author_sort Traversa, Marissa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Social psychological research on collective action and intergroup harm has yet to adequately consider the potential role of cancel culture or feelings of collective validation in motivating collective action. The current research will begin to fill this gap and may broaden our understanding of the psychological mechanisms that inspire and maintain collective action in response to intergroup harm. To our knowledge, this research is the first social psychological analysis of the impact of cancel culture on collective action and as means for producing feelings of collective validation. METHODS: In two experimental studies, participants read a story describing an event of discrimination against their group followed by a manipulation of the presence or absence of an episode of cancel culture. Study 1 samples woman university students (N = 520) and focuses on their responses to a sexist incident on campus. Study 2 (pre-registered) assesses the generality of the model in a racism context with a community sample of East Asian Canadians and Americans (N = 237). RESULTS: Study 1 showed that an episode of cancel culture had an indirect positive effect on collective action intentions mediated by feelings of collective validation and collective empowerment. Study 2 showed the indirect effect of cancel culture on collective action intentions mediated by feelings of collective validation and collective anger and contempt. DISCUSSION: The current research offers a novel theoretical and empirical introduction to the concept of collective validation and the understudied context of cancel culture to the existing social psychological research and theory on collective action. Further, cancel culture has been criticized as problematic. However, this perspective centres those in positions of power. Through this research, we hope to shift the focus onto marginalized groups’ perspectives of episodes of cancel culture. This research shows that groups who experience harm find these episodes of cancel culture validating in ways that have yet to be fully explored by intergroup relations research. Further, these findings suggest that collective validation does mediate the relationship between cancel culture and collective action; thus, cancel culture becomes an important contributor to resistance by marginalized groups through collective validation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10399695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103996952023-08-04 Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm Traversa, Marissa Tian, Ying Wright, Stephen C. Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: Social psychological research on collective action and intergroup harm has yet to adequately consider the potential role of cancel culture or feelings of collective validation in motivating collective action. The current research will begin to fill this gap and may broaden our understanding of the psychological mechanisms that inspire and maintain collective action in response to intergroup harm. To our knowledge, this research is the first social psychological analysis of the impact of cancel culture on collective action and as means for producing feelings of collective validation. METHODS: In two experimental studies, participants read a story describing an event of discrimination against their group followed by a manipulation of the presence or absence of an episode of cancel culture. Study 1 samples woman university students (N = 520) and focuses on their responses to a sexist incident on campus. Study 2 (pre-registered) assesses the generality of the model in a racism context with a community sample of East Asian Canadians and Americans (N = 237). RESULTS: Study 1 showed that an episode of cancel culture had an indirect positive effect on collective action intentions mediated by feelings of collective validation and collective empowerment. Study 2 showed the indirect effect of cancel culture on collective action intentions mediated by feelings of collective validation and collective anger and contempt. DISCUSSION: The current research offers a novel theoretical and empirical introduction to the concept of collective validation and the understudied context of cancel culture to the existing social psychological research and theory on collective action. Further, cancel culture has been criticized as problematic. However, this perspective centres those in positions of power. Through this research, we hope to shift the focus onto marginalized groups’ perspectives of episodes of cancel culture. This research shows that groups who experience harm find these episodes of cancel culture validating in ways that have yet to be fully explored by intergroup relations research. Further, these findings suggest that collective validation does mediate the relationship between cancel culture and collective action; thus, cancel culture becomes an important contributor to resistance by marginalized groups through collective validation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10399695/ /pubmed/37546434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181872 Text en Copyright © 2023 Traversa, Tian and Wright. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Traversa, Marissa
Tian, Ying
Wright, Stephen C.
Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm
title Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm
title_full Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm
title_fullStr Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm
title_full_unstemmed Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm
title_short Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm
title_sort cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546434
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181872
work_keys_str_mv AT traversamarissa cancelculturecanbecollectivelyvalidatingforgroupsexperiencingharm
AT tianying cancelculturecanbecollectivelyvalidatingforgroupsexperiencingharm
AT wrightstephenc cancelculturecanbecollectivelyvalidatingforgroupsexperiencingharm