Cargando…

An approach to difficult airway in infants: Comparison of GlideScope(®) Spectrum LoPro, GlideScope(®) Spectrum Miller and conventional Macintosh and Miller blades in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence performed by 90 anesthesiologists

BACKGROUND: Airway management can be challenging in neonates and infants. The Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a condition characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis and airway obstruction. The airway management of these patients poses great challenges for anesthesiologists and pediatricians alike. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irouschek, Andrea, Moritz, Andreas, Kremer, Sven, Fuchte, Tobias, Danzl, Anja, Schmidt, Joachim, Golditz, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37535590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288816
_version_ 1785084318520967168
author Irouschek, Andrea
Moritz, Andreas
Kremer, Sven
Fuchte, Tobias
Danzl, Anja
Schmidt, Joachim
Golditz, Tobias
author_facet Irouschek, Andrea
Moritz, Andreas
Kremer, Sven
Fuchte, Tobias
Danzl, Anja
Schmidt, Joachim
Golditz, Tobias
author_sort Irouschek, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Airway management can be challenging in neonates and infants. The Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a condition characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis and airway obstruction. The airway management of these patients poses great challenges for anesthesiologists and pediatricians alike. To date, there has been no direct comparison of the hyperangulated GlideScope(®) Spectrum LoPro (GLP), the straight GlideScope(®) Spectrum Miller (GSM), a conventional Macintosh (MC) and a conventional Miller blade (ML) in patients with PRS. METHODS: For this purpose, 90 anesthesiologists (43 with limited experience, 47 with extensive experience) performed orotracheal intubation on an Air-Sim(®) Pierre Robin X manikin using GLP, GSM, MC and ML in randomized order. ‘Time-to-vocal-cords’, ‘time-to-intubate’, ‘time-to-ventilate’, the severity of oral-soft-tissue-trauma and the subjective evaluation of each device were recorded. RESULTS: A significantly faster and better view of the vocal cords and lower oral-soft-tissue-trauma was achieved using the GLP (p<0.001). Though, there were no significant differences in the ‘time-to-intubate’ or ‘time-to-ventilate’. The highest intubation success rate was found with GSM and the lowest with GLP (GSM 100%, ML 97.8%, MC 96.7%, GLP 93.3%). When using the videolaryngoscopes, there were no undetected esophageal intubations but in six cases prolonged attempts of intubation (>120s) with the GLP. In the sub-group with extensive experience, we found significantly shorter intubation times for the GSM and ML. The GLP was the tool of choice for most participants, while the conventional MC received the lowest rating. CONCLUSIONS: Videolaryngoscopy leads to increased safety for the prevention of undetected esophageal intubation in the airway management in a PRS manikin. Hyperangulated blades may ensure a good and fast view of the vocal cords and low oral-soft-tissue-trauma but pose a challenge during the placement of the tube. Specific skills and handling seem to be necessary to ensure a safe tube placement with this sort of blades.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10399777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103997772023-08-04 An approach to difficult airway in infants: Comparison of GlideScope(®) Spectrum LoPro, GlideScope(®) Spectrum Miller and conventional Macintosh and Miller blades in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence performed by 90 anesthesiologists Irouschek, Andrea Moritz, Andreas Kremer, Sven Fuchte, Tobias Danzl, Anja Schmidt, Joachim Golditz, Tobias PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Airway management can be challenging in neonates and infants. The Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a condition characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis and airway obstruction. The airway management of these patients poses great challenges for anesthesiologists and pediatricians alike. To date, there has been no direct comparison of the hyperangulated GlideScope(®) Spectrum LoPro (GLP), the straight GlideScope(®) Spectrum Miller (GSM), a conventional Macintosh (MC) and a conventional Miller blade (ML) in patients with PRS. METHODS: For this purpose, 90 anesthesiologists (43 with limited experience, 47 with extensive experience) performed orotracheal intubation on an Air-Sim(®) Pierre Robin X manikin using GLP, GSM, MC and ML in randomized order. ‘Time-to-vocal-cords’, ‘time-to-intubate’, ‘time-to-ventilate’, the severity of oral-soft-tissue-trauma and the subjective evaluation of each device were recorded. RESULTS: A significantly faster and better view of the vocal cords and lower oral-soft-tissue-trauma was achieved using the GLP (p<0.001). Though, there were no significant differences in the ‘time-to-intubate’ or ‘time-to-ventilate’. The highest intubation success rate was found with GSM and the lowest with GLP (GSM 100%, ML 97.8%, MC 96.7%, GLP 93.3%). When using the videolaryngoscopes, there were no undetected esophageal intubations but in six cases prolonged attempts of intubation (>120s) with the GLP. In the sub-group with extensive experience, we found significantly shorter intubation times for the GSM and ML. The GLP was the tool of choice for most participants, while the conventional MC received the lowest rating. CONCLUSIONS: Videolaryngoscopy leads to increased safety for the prevention of undetected esophageal intubation in the airway management in a PRS manikin. Hyperangulated blades may ensure a good and fast view of the vocal cords and low oral-soft-tissue-trauma but pose a challenge during the placement of the tube. Specific skills and handling seem to be necessary to ensure a safe tube placement with this sort of blades. Public Library of Science 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10399777/ /pubmed/37535590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288816 Text en © 2023 Irouschek et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Irouschek, Andrea
Moritz, Andreas
Kremer, Sven
Fuchte, Tobias
Danzl, Anja
Schmidt, Joachim
Golditz, Tobias
An approach to difficult airway in infants: Comparison of GlideScope(®) Spectrum LoPro, GlideScope(®) Spectrum Miller and conventional Macintosh and Miller blades in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence performed by 90 anesthesiologists
title An approach to difficult airway in infants: Comparison of GlideScope(®) Spectrum LoPro, GlideScope(®) Spectrum Miller and conventional Macintosh and Miller blades in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence performed by 90 anesthesiologists
title_full An approach to difficult airway in infants: Comparison of GlideScope(®) Spectrum LoPro, GlideScope(®) Spectrum Miller and conventional Macintosh and Miller blades in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence performed by 90 anesthesiologists
title_fullStr An approach to difficult airway in infants: Comparison of GlideScope(®) Spectrum LoPro, GlideScope(®) Spectrum Miller and conventional Macintosh and Miller blades in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence performed by 90 anesthesiologists
title_full_unstemmed An approach to difficult airway in infants: Comparison of GlideScope(®) Spectrum LoPro, GlideScope(®) Spectrum Miller and conventional Macintosh and Miller blades in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence performed by 90 anesthesiologists
title_short An approach to difficult airway in infants: Comparison of GlideScope(®) Spectrum LoPro, GlideScope(®) Spectrum Miller and conventional Macintosh and Miller blades in a simulated Pierre Robin sequence performed by 90 anesthesiologists
title_sort approach to difficult airway in infants: comparison of glidescope(®) spectrum lopro, glidescope(®) spectrum miller and conventional macintosh and miller blades in a simulated pierre robin sequence performed by 90 anesthesiologists
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37535590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288816
work_keys_str_mv AT irouschekandrea anapproachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT moritzandreas anapproachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT kremersven anapproachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT fuchtetobias anapproachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT danzlanja anapproachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT schmidtjoachim anapproachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT golditztobias anapproachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT irouschekandrea approachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT moritzandreas approachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT kremersven approachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT fuchtetobias approachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT danzlanja approachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT schmidtjoachim approachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists
AT golditztobias approachtodifficultairwayininfantscomparisonofglidescopespectrumloproglidescopespectrummillerandconventionalmacintoshandmillerbladesinasimulatedpierrerobinsequenceperformedby90anesthesiologists