Cargando…

Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for wound treatment of pressure injury: A pilot study of a randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: International guidelines for managing pressure injury (PI) and ulcers recommend that family members and caregivers should be involved in making decisions for appropriate wound care. However, the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) in the context of PI remains unknown. This study inves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Mei-Yu, Chen, Yu-Sin, Chen, Ying-Chun, Wu, Yu-Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37545793
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_256_22
_version_ 1785084333831225344
author Hsu, Mei-Yu
Chen, Yu-Sin
Chen, Ying-Chun
Wu, Yu-Lin
author_facet Hsu, Mei-Yu
Chen, Yu-Sin
Chen, Ying-Chun
Wu, Yu-Lin
author_sort Hsu, Mei-Yu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: International guidelines for managing pressure injury (PI) and ulcers recommend that family members and caregivers should be involved in making decisions for appropriate wound care. However, the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) in the context of PI remains unknown. This study investigated the efficacy of nurse-led medical SDM for PI treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a patient decision aid (PDA) for PI treatment on the basis of nursing evidence. Subsequently, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of SDM compared with that of usual care (control group, [CG]) for PI treatment. Participants with stage 3, stage 4, or unstageable PI were included and randomized into two groups. In the SDM group (SDMG), 10 participants received the SDM intervention for PI before treatment. All participants were followed up for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were measured using the nine-item SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Secondary outcomes included wound size and cost of wound management. RESULTS: The expert validity (medical professors and general population) of the PDA designed for PI was measured, and the content validity index was 0.96–0.97. A total of 20 participants were enrolled (10 received SDM and 10 received usual care). The mean age of the participants was 55.7 ± 8.8 years. No significant difference in baseline characteristics (sex, age, staging, or wound area) was observed between the two groups. The SDMG had higher SDM-Q-9 (P < 0.001) and DCS (P < 0.01) scores than did the CG. For the secondary outcomes, the SDMG had a decreased change of wound size and lower wound management costs than did the CG; nevertheless, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: We constructed a PDA for PI treatment, which can be applied in clinical care. The pilot test results revealed that the participants had a lower cost related wound treatment and decreasing wound size in SDMG than CG after the intervention of SDM-PI for 4 weeks. In the future, clinical studies should conduct large-scale randomized trials based on the results of this pilot study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10399837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103998372023-08-04 Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for wound treatment of pressure injury: A pilot study of a randomized trial Hsu, Mei-Yu Chen, Yu-Sin Chen, Ying-Chun Wu, Yu-Lin Tzu Chi Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: International guidelines for managing pressure injury (PI) and ulcers recommend that family members and caregivers should be involved in making decisions for appropriate wound care. However, the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) in the context of PI remains unknown. This study investigated the efficacy of nurse-led medical SDM for PI treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a patient decision aid (PDA) for PI treatment on the basis of nursing evidence. Subsequently, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of SDM compared with that of usual care (control group, [CG]) for PI treatment. Participants with stage 3, stage 4, or unstageable PI were included and randomized into two groups. In the SDM group (SDMG), 10 participants received the SDM intervention for PI before treatment. All participants were followed up for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were measured using the nine-item SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Secondary outcomes included wound size and cost of wound management. RESULTS: The expert validity (medical professors and general population) of the PDA designed for PI was measured, and the content validity index was 0.96–0.97. A total of 20 participants were enrolled (10 received SDM and 10 received usual care). The mean age of the participants was 55.7 ± 8.8 years. No significant difference in baseline characteristics (sex, age, staging, or wound area) was observed between the two groups. The SDMG had higher SDM-Q-9 (P < 0.001) and DCS (P < 0.01) scores than did the CG. For the secondary outcomes, the SDMG had a decreased change of wound size and lower wound management costs than did the CG; nevertheless, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: We constructed a PDA for PI treatment, which can be applied in clinical care. The pilot test results revealed that the participants had a lower cost related wound treatment and decreasing wound size in SDMG than CG after the intervention of SDM-PI for 4 weeks. In the future, clinical studies should conduct large-scale randomized trials based on the results of this pilot study. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10399837/ /pubmed/37545793 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_256_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Tzu Chi Medical Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hsu, Mei-Yu
Chen, Yu-Sin
Chen, Ying-Chun
Wu, Yu-Lin
Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for wound treatment of pressure injury: A pilot study of a randomized trial
title Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for wound treatment of pressure injury: A pilot study of a randomized trial
title_full Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for wound treatment of pressure injury: A pilot study of a randomized trial
title_fullStr Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for wound treatment of pressure injury: A pilot study of a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for wound treatment of pressure injury: A pilot study of a randomized trial
title_short Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for wound treatment of pressure injury: A pilot study of a randomized trial
title_sort nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for wound treatment of pressure injury: a pilot study of a randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37545793
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_256_22
work_keys_str_mv AT hsumeiyu nurseledcoachingofshareddecisionmakingforwoundtreatmentofpressureinjuryapilotstudyofarandomizedtrial
AT chenyusin nurseledcoachingofshareddecisionmakingforwoundtreatmentofpressureinjuryapilotstudyofarandomizedtrial
AT chenyingchun nurseledcoachingofshareddecisionmakingforwoundtreatmentofpressureinjuryapilotstudyofarandomizedtrial
AT wuyulin nurseledcoachingofshareddecisionmakingforwoundtreatmentofpressureinjuryapilotstudyofarandomizedtrial