Cargando…

Comparison of DNA concentration and bacterial pathogen PCR detection when using two DNA extraction kits for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples

INTRODUCTION: Several important human pathogens that cause life-threatening infections are asymptomatically carried in the Nasopharynx/Oropharynx (NP/OP). DNA extraction is a prerequisite for most culture-independent techniques used to identify pathogens in the NP/OP. However, components of DNA extr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Dam, Thomas, Shola-Able, Tientcheu, Peggy-Estelle, Suso, Sambou M. S., Dupont, Christopher, Kwambana-Adams, Brenda, Mohammed, Nuredin Ibrahim, Nicol, Mark P., Antonio, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37535692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289557
_version_ 1785084344622120960
author Khan, Dam
Thomas, Shola-Able
Tientcheu, Peggy-Estelle
Suso, Sambou M. S.
Dupont, Christopher
Kwambana-Adams, Brenda
Mohammed, Nuredin Ibrahim
Nicol, Mark P.
Antonio, Martin
author_facet Khan, Dam
Thomas, Shola-Able
Tientcheu, Peggy-Estelle
Suso, Sambou M. S.
Dupont, Christopher
Kwambana-Adams, Brenda
Mohammed, Nuredin Ibrahim
Nicol, Mark P.
Antonio, Martin
author_sort Khan, Dam
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Several important human pathogens that cause life-threatening infections are asymptomatically carried in the Nasopharynx/Oropharynx (NP/OP). DNA extraction is a prerequisite for most culture-independent techniques used to identify pathogens in the NP/OP. However, components of DNA extraction kits differ thereby giving rise to differences in performance. We compared the DNA concentration and the detection of three pathogens in the NP/OP using the discontinued DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (Kit DP) and the DNeasy PowerLyzer PowerSoil Kit (Kit DPP). METHODS: DNA was extracted from the same set of 103 NP/OP samples using the two kits. DNA concentration was measured using the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer. Real-time Polymerase Chain reaction (RT-PCR) was done using the QuantStudio 7-flex system to detect three pathogens: S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and N. meningitidis. Bland-Altman statistics and plots were used to determine the threshold cycle (Ct) value agreement for the two kits. RESULTS: The average DNA concentration from kit DPP was higher than Kit DP; 1235.6 ng/ml (SD = 1368.3) vs 884.9 ng/ml (SD = 1095.3), p = 0.002. Using a Ct value cutoff of 40 for positivity, the concordance for the presence of S. pneumoniae was 82% (84/102); 94%(96/103) for N. meningitidis and 92%(95/103) for H. influenzae. Kit DP proportionately resulted in higher Ct values than Kit DPP for all pathogens. The Ct value bias of measurement for S. pneumoniae was +2.4 (95% CI, 1.9–3.0), +1.4 (95% CI, 0.9–1.9) for N. meningitidis and +1.4 (95% CI, 0.2–2.5) for H. influenzae. CONCLUSION: The higher DNA concentration obtained using kit DPP could increase the chances of recovering low abundant bacteria. The PCR results were reproducible for more than 90% of the samples for the gram-negative H. influenzae and N. meningitidis. Ct value variations of the kits must be taken into consideration when comparing studies that have used the two kits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10399880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103998802023-08-04 Comparison of DNA concentration and bacterial pathogen PCR detection when using two DNA extraction kits for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples Khan, Dam Thomas, Shola-Able Tientcheu, Peggy-Estelle Suso, Sambou M. S. Dupont, Christopher Kwambana-Adams, Brenda Mohammed, Nuredin Ibrahim Nicol, Mark P. Antonio, Martin PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Several important human pathogens that cause life-threatening infections are asymptomatically carried in the Nasopharynx/Oropharynx (NP/OP). DNA extraction is a prerequisite for most culture-independent techniques used to identify pathogens in the NP/OP. However, components of DNA extraction kits differ thereby giving rise to differences in performance. We compared the DNA concentration and the detection of three pathogens in the NP/OP using the discontinued DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (Kit DP) and the DNeasy PowerLyzer PowerSoil Kit (Kit DPP). METHODS: DNA was extracted from the same set of 103 NP/OP samples using the two kits. DNA concentration was measured using the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer. Real-time Polymerase Chain reaction (RT-PCR) was done using the QuantStudio 7-flex system to detect three pathogens: S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and N. meningitidis. Bland-Altman statistics and plots were used to determine the threshold cycle (Ct) value agreement for the two kits. RESULTS: The average DNA concentration from kit DPP was higher than Kit DP; 1235.6 ng/ml (SD = 1368.3) vs 884.9 ng/ml (SD = 1095.3), p = 0.002. Using a Ct value cutoff of 40 for positivity, the concordance for the presence of S. pneumoniae was 82% (84/102); 94%(96/103) for N. meningitidis and 92%(95/103) for H. influenzae. Kit DP proportionately resulted in higher Ct values than Kit DPP for all pathogens. The Ct value bias of measurement for S. pneumoniae was +2.4 (95% CI, 1.9–3.0), +1.4 (95% CI, 0.9–1.9) for N. meningitidis and +1.4 (95% CI, 0.2–2.5) for H. influenzae. CONCLUSION: The higher DNA concentration obtained using kit DPP could increase the chances of recovering low abundant bacteria. The PCR results were reproducible for more than 90% of the samples for the gram-negative H. influenzae and N. meningitidis. Ct value variations of the kits must be taken into consideration when comparing studies that have used the two kits. Public Library of Science 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10399880/ /pubmed/37535692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289557 Text en © 2023 Khan et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khan, Dam
Thomas, Shola-Able
Tientcheu, Peggy-Estelle
Suso, Sambou M. S.
Dupont, Christopher
Kwambana-Adams, Brenda
Mohammed, Nuredin Ibrahim
Nicol, Mark P.
Antonio, Martin
Comparison of DNA concentration and bacterial pathogen PCR detection when using two DNA extraction kits for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples
title Comparison of DNA concentration and bacterial pathogen PCR detection when using two DNA extraction kits for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples
title_full Comparison of DNA concentration and bacterial pathogen PCR detection when using two DNA extraction kits for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples
title_fullStr Comparison of DNA concentration and bacterial pathogen PCR detection when using two DNA extraction kits for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of DNA concentration and bacterial pathogen PCR detection when using two DNA extraction kits for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples
title_short Comparison of DNA concentration and bacterial pathogen PCR detection when using two DNA extraction kits for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples
title_sort comparison of dna concentration and bacterial pathogen pcr detection when using two dna extraction kits for nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37535692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289557
work_keys_str_mv AT khandam comparisonofdnaconcentrationandbacterialpathogenpcrdetectionwhenusingtwodnaextractionkitsfornasopharyngealoropharyngealsamples
AT thomassholaable comparisonofdnaconcentrationandbacterialpathogenpcrdetectionwhenusingtwodnaextractionkitsfornasopharyngealoropharyngealsamples
AT tientcheupeggyestelle comparisonofdnaconcentrationandbacterialpathogenpcrdetectionwhenusingtwodnaextractionkitsfornasopharyngealoropharyngealsamples
AT susosamboums comparisonofdnaconcentrationandbacterialpathogenpcrdetectionwhenusingtwodnaextractionkitsfornasopharyngealoropharyngealsamples
AT dupontchristopher comparisonofdnaconcentrationandbacterialpathogenpcrdetectionwhenusingtwodnaextractionkitsfornasopharyngealoropharyngealsamples
AT kwambanaadamsbrenda comparisonofdnaconcentrationandbacterialpathogenpcrdetectionwhenusingtwodnaextractionkitsfornasopharyngealoropharyngealsamples
AT mohammednuredinibrahim comparisonofdnaconcentrationandbacterialpathogenpcrdetectionwhenusingtwodnaextractionkitsfornasopharyngealoropharyngealsamples
AT nicolmarkp comparisonofdnaconcentrationandbacterialpathogenpcrdetectionwhenusingtwodnaextractionkitsfornasopharyngealoropharyngealsamples
AT antoniomartin comparisonofdnaconcentrationandbacterialpathogenpcrdetectionwhenusingtwodnaextractionkitsfornasopharyngealoropharyngealsamples