Cargando…

Life cycle complexity and body mass drive erratic changes in climate vulnerability across ontogeny in a seasonally migrating butterfly

Physiological traits are often used for vulnerability assessments of organismal responses to climate change. Trait values can change dramatically over the life cycle of organisms but are typically assessed at a single developmental stage. Reconciling ontogenetic changes in physiological traits with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medina-Báez, Osmary A, Lenard, Angie, Muzychuk, Rut A, da Silva, Carmen R B, Diamond, Sarah E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coad058
_version_ 1785084572250144768
author Medina-Báez, Osmary A
Lenard, Angie
Muzychuk, Rut A
da Silva, Carmen R B
Diamond, Sarah E
author_facet Medina-Báez, Osmary A
Lenard, Angie
Muzychuk, Rut A
da Silva, Carmen R B
Diamond, Sarah E
author_sort Medina-Báez, Osmary A
collection PubMed
description Physiological traits are often used for vulnerability assessments of organismal responses to climate change. Trait values can change dramatically over the life cycle of organisms but are typically assessed at a single developmental stage. Reconciling ontogenetic changes in physiological traits with vulnerability assessments often reveals early life-stage vulnerabilities. The degree to which ontogenetic changes in physiological traits are due to changes in body mass over development versus stage-specific responses determines the degree to which mass can be used as a proxy for vulnerability. Here, we use the painted lady butterfly, Vanessa cardui, to test ontogenetic changes in two physiological traits, the acute thermal sensitivity of routine metabolic rate (RMR Q(10)) and the critical thermal maximum (CT(max)). RMR Q(10) generally followed ontogenetic changes in body mass, with stages characterized by smaller body mass exhibiting lower acute thermal sensitivity. However, CT(max) was largely decoupled from ontogenetic changes in body mass. In contrast with trends from other studies showing increasing vulnerability among progressively earlier developmental stages, our study revealed highly erratic patterns of vulnerability across ontogeny. Specifically, we found the lowest joint-trait vulnerability (both RMR Q(10) and CT(max)) in the earliest developmental stage we tested (3rd instar larvae), the highest vulnerabilities in the next two developmental stages (4th and 5th instar larvae), and reduced vulnerability into the pupal and adult stages. Our study supports growing evidence of mechanistic decoupling of physiology across developmental stages and suggests that body mass is not a universal proxy for all physiological trait indicators of climate vulnerability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10401068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104010682023-08-05 Life cycle complexity and body mass drive erratic changes in climate vulnerability across ontogeny in a seasonally migrating butterfly Medina-Báez, Osmary A Lenard, Angie Muzychuk, Rut A da Silva, Carmen R B Diamond, Sarah E Conserv Physiol Research Article Physiological traits are often used for vulnerability assessments of organismal responses to climate change. Trait values can change dramatically over the life cycle of organisms but are typically assessed at a single developmental stage. Reconciling ontogenetic changes in physiological traits with vulnerability assessments often reveals early life-stage vulnerabilities. The degree to which ontogenetic changes in physiological traits are due to changes in body mass over development versus stage-specific responses determines the degree to which mass can be used as a proxy for vulnerability. Here, we use the painted lady butterfly, Vanessa cardui, to test ontogenetic changes in two physiological traits, the acute thermal sensitivity of routine metabolic rate (RMR Q(10)) and the critical thermal maximum (CT(max)). RMR Q(10) generally followed ontogenetic changes in body mass, with stages characterized by smaller body mass exhibiting lower acute thermal sensitivity. However, CT(max) was largely decoupled from ontogenetic changes in body mass. In contrast with trends from other studies showing increasing vulnerability among progressively earlier developmental stages, our study revealed highly erratic patterns of vulnerability across ontogeny. Specifically, we found the lowest joint-trait vulnerability (both RMR Q(10) and CT(max)) in the earliest developmental stage we tested (3rd instar larvae), the highest vulnerabilities in the next two developmental stages (4th and 5th instar larvae), and reduced vulnerability into the pupal and adult stages. Our study supports growing evidence of mechanistic decoupling of physiology across developmental stages and suggests that body mass is not a universal proxy for all physiological trait indicators of climate vulnerability. Oxford University Press 2023-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10401068/ /pubmed/37547363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coad058 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Medina-Báez, Osmary A
Lenard, Angie
Muzychuk, Rut A
da Silva, Carmen R B
Diamond, Sarah E
Life cycle complexity and body mass drive erratic changes in climate vulnerability across ontogeny in a seasonally migrating butterfly
title Life cycle complexity and body mass drive erratic changes in climate vulnerability across ontogeny in a seasonally migrating butterfly
title_full Life cycle complexity and body mass drive erratic changes in climate vulnerability across ontogeny in a seasonally migrating butterfly
title_fullStr Life cycle complexity and body mass drive erratic changes in climate vulnerability across ontogeny in a seasonally migrating butterfly
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle complexity and body mass drive erratic changes in climate vulnerability across ontogeny in a seasonally migrating butterfly
title_short Life cycle complexity and body mass drive erratic changes in climate vulnerability across ontogeny in a seasonally migrating butterfly
title_sort life cycle complexity and body mass drive erratic changes in climate vulnerability across ontogeny in a seasonally migrating butterfly
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coad058
work_keys_str_mv AT medinabaezosmarya lifecyclecomplexityandbodymassdriveerraticchangesinclimatevulnerabilityacrossontogenyinaseasonallymigratingbutterfly
AT lenardangie lifecyclecomplexityandbodymassdriveerraticchangesinclimatevulnerabilityacrossontogenyinaseasonallymigratingbutterfly
AT muzychukruta lifecyclecomplexityandbodymassdriveerraticchangesinclimatevulnerabilityacrossontogenyinaseasonallymigratingbutterfly
AT dasilvacarmenrb lifecyclecomplexityandbodymassdriveerraticchangesinclimatevulnerabilityacrossontogenyinaseasonallymigratingbutterfly
AT diamondsarahe lifecyclecomplexityandbodymassdriveerraticchangesinclimatevulnerabilityacrossontogenyinaseasonallymigratingbutterfly