Cargando…

What is the current state of research concerning self-efficacy in exercise behaviour? Protocol for two systematic evidence maps

INTRODUCTION: Knowing about a risk factor is not sufficient to ensure corresponding behaviour as additional psychological factors play a role. Self-efficacy is one of the major factors. This also applies to physical activity and exercise behaviour, which is a major public health topic in both primar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bill, Vanessa, Wilke, Annika, Sonsmann, Flora, Rocholl, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37532475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070359
_version_ 1785084607886000128
author Bill, Vanessa
Wilke, Annika
Sonsmann, Flora
Rocholl, Marc
author_facet Bill, Vanessa
Wilke, Annika
Sonsmann, Flora
Rocholl, Marc
author_sort Bill, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Knowing about a risk factor is not sufficient to ensure corresponding behaviour as additional psychological factors play a role. Self-efficacy is one of the major factors. This also applies to physical activity and exercise behaviour, which is a major public health topic in both primary and secondary prevention. The amount of research on self-efficacy in exercise behaviour is high yet remains uncharted. This protocol presents the research design for two systematic evidence maps on self-efficacy in exercise behaviour in (1) primary prevention and (2) secondary prevention. These maps will thus provide a comprehensive overview over the current state in published empirical research as a starting point for future researchers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The databases Medline (via PubMed) and PsycINFO (via EbscoHost) will be searched using the search terms ‘self-efficacy’ and any of the search terms ‘sport’ and ‘exercise’ in titles and abstracts. All empirical research studies which have measured self-efficacy in relation to exercise behaviour will be included. The primary prevention systematic evidence map will aggregate all studies on healthy humans and the secondary prevention systematic evidence map will include all studies on humans with a pre-existing condition. We will extract and present the data points authors, title, year, sample size (N), age groups, surveyed sport and method of measuring self-efficacy in both systematic evidence maps. Moreover, we will extract and present the target group in the systematic evidence map on primary prevention and the pre-existing condition in the systematic evidence map on secondary prevention. In addition to a data table, we will create freely accessible evidence maps in the form of graphs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since this is a protocol, an ethics approval is not required for the presented and planned work. The results of the two systematic evidence maps will be disseminated via publication in international peer-reviewed journals. In addition, data will be shared in detail via the Open Science Framework platform.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10401211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104012112023-08-05 What is the current state of research concerning self-efficacy in exercise behaviour? Protocol for two systematic evidence maps Bill, Vanessa Wilke, Annika Sonsmann, Flora Rocholl, Marc BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Knowing about a risk factor is not sufficient to ensure corresponding behaviour as additional psychological factors play a role. Self-efficacy is one of the major factors. This also applies to physical activity and exercise behaviour, which is a major public health topic in both primary and secondary prevention. The amount of research on self-efficacy in exercise behaviour is high yet remains uncharted. This protocol presents the research design for two systematic evidence maps on self-efficacy in exercise behaviour in (1) primary prevention and (2) secondary prevention. These maps will thus provide a comprehensive overview over the current state in published empirical research as a starting point for future researchers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The databases Medline (via PubMed) and PsycINFO (via EbscoHost) will be searched using the search terms ‘self-efficacy’ and any of the search terms ‘sport’ and ‘exercise’ in titles and abstracts. All empirical research studies which have measured self-efficacy in relation to exercise behaviour will be included. The primary prevention systematic evidence map will aggregate all studies on healthy humans and the secondary prevention systematic evidence map will include all studies on humans with a pre-existing condition. We will extract and present the data points authors, title, year, sample size (N), age groups, surveyed sport and method of measuring self-efficacy in both systematic evidence maps. Moreover, we will extract and present the target group in the systematic evidence map on primary prevention and the pre-existing condition in the systematic evidence map on secondary prevention. In addition to a data table, we will create freely accessible evidence maps in the form of graphs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since this is a protocol, an ethics approval is not required for the presented and planned work. The results of the two systematic evidence maps will be disseminated via publication in international peer-reviewed journals. In addition, data will be shared in detail via the Open Science Framework platform. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10401211/ /pubmed/37532475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070359 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Bill, Vanessa
Wilke, Annika
Sonsmann, Flora
Rocholl, Marc
What is the current state of research concerning self-efficacy in exercise behaviour? Protocol for two systematic evidence maps
title What is the current state of research concerning self-efficacy in exercise behaviour? Protocol for two systematic evidence maps
title_full What is the current state of research concerning self-efficacy in exercise behaviour? Protocol for two systematic evidence maps
title_fullStr What is the current state of research concerning self-efficacy in exercise behaviour? Protocol for two systematic evidence maps
title_full_unstemmed What is the current state of research concerning self-efficacy in exercise behaviour? Protocol for two systematic evidence maps
title_short What is the current state of research concerning self-efficacy in exercise behaviour? Protocol for two systematic evidence maps
title_sort what is the current state of research concerning self-efficacy in exercise behaviour? protocol for two systematic evidence maps
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37532475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070359
work_keys_str_mv AT billvanessa whatisthecurrentstateofresearchconcerningselfefficacyinexercisebehaviourprotocolfortwosystematicevidencemaps
AT wilkeannika whatisthecurrentstateofresearchconcerningselfefficacyinexercisebehaviourprotocolfortwosystematicevidencemaps
AT sonsmannflora whatisthecurrentstateofresearchconcerningselfefficacyinexercisebehaviourprotocolfortwosystematicevidencemaps
AT rochollmarc whatisthecurrentstateofresearchconcerningselfefficacyinexercisebehaviourprotocolfortwosystematicevidencemaps