Cargando…

Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS)

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic knee pain is increasing. Osteoarthritis (OA) and persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) are two important causes of knee pain. Chronic knee pain is primarily treated with medications, physiotherapy, life-style changes and intra-articular infiltrations. A radiofre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanneste, Thibaut, Belba, Amy, van Kuijk, Sander, Kimman, Merel, Bellemans, Johan, Bonhomme, Vincent, Sommer, Micha, Emans, Pieter, Vankrunkelsven, Patrik, Tartaglia, Katrien, Van Zundert, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37532482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073949
_version_ 1785084610745466880
author Vanneste, Thibaut
Belba, Amy
van Kuijk, Sander
Kimman, Merel
Bellemans, Johan
Bonhomme, Vincent
Sommer, Micha
Emans, Pieter
Vankrunkelsven, Patrik
Tartaglia, Katrien
Van Zundert, Jan
author_facet Vanneste, Thibaut
Belba, Amy
van Kuijk, Sander
Kimman, Merel
Bellemans, Johan
Bonhomme, Vincent
Sommer, Micha
Emans, Pieter
Vankrunkelsven, Patrik
Tartaglia, Katrien
Van Zundert, Jan
author_sort Vanneste, Thibaut
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic knee pain is increasing. Osteoarthritis (OA) and persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) are two important causes of knee pain. Chronic knee pain is primarily treated with medications, physiotherapy, life-style changes and intra-articular infiltrations. A radiofrequency treatment (RF) of the genicular nerves is a therapeutical option for refractory knee pain. This study investigates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conventional and cooled RF in patients suffering from chronic, therapy resistant, moderate to severe knee pain due to OA and PPSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The COGENIUS trial is a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Patients and outcome assessors are blinded. Patients will be recruited and treated in Belgium and the Netherlands. All PPSP after a total knee prothesis and OA patients (grades 2–4) will undergo a run-in period of 1–3 months where conservative treatment will be optimised. After the run-in period, 200 patient per group will be randomised to conventional RF, cooled RF or a sham procedure following a 2:2:1 ratio. The analysis will include a comparison of the effectiveness of each RF treatment with the sham procedure and secondarily between conventional and cooled RF. All comparisons will be made for each indication separately. The primary outcome is the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at 6 months. Other outcomes include knee pain, physical functionality, health-related quality of life, emotional health, medication use, healthcare and societal cost and adverse events up to 24 months postintervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Antwerp (Number Project ID 3069-Edge 002190-BUN B3002022000025), the Ethics committee of Maastricht University (Number NL80503.068.22-METC22-023) and the Ethics committee of all participating hospitals. Results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05407610.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10401223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104012232023-08-05 Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS) Vanneste, Thibaut Belba, Amy van Kuijk, Sander Kimman, Merel Bellemans, Johan Bonhomme, Vincent Sommer, Micha Emans, Pieter Vankrunkelsven, Patrik Tartaglia, Katrien Van Zundert, Jan BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic knee pain is increasing. Osteoarthritis (OA) and persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) are two important causes of knee pain. Chronic knee pain is primarily treated with medications, physiotherapy, life-style changes and intra-articular infiltrations. A radiofrequency treatment (RF) of the genicular nerves is a therapeutical option for refractory knee pain. This study investigates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conventional and cooled RF in patients suffering from chronic, therapy resistant, moderate to severe knee pain due to OA and PPSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The COGENIUS trial is a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Patients and outcome assessors are blinded. Patients will be recruited and treated in Belgium and the Netherlands. All PPSP after a total knee prothesis and OA patients (grades 2–4) will undergo a run-in period of 1–3 months where conservative treatment will be optimised. After the run-in period, 200 patient per group will be randomised to conventional RF, cooled RF or a sham procedure following a 2:2:1 ratio. The analysis will include a comparison of the effectiveness of each RF treatment with the sham procedure and secondarily between conventional and cooled RF. All comparisons will be made for each indication separately. The primary outcome is the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at 6 months. Other outcomes include knee pain, physical functionality, health-related quality of life, emotional health, medication use, healthcare and societal cost and adverse events up to 24 months postintervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Antwerp (Number Project ID 3069-Edge 002190-BUN B3002022000025), the Ethics committee of Maastricht University (Number NL80503.068.22-METC22-023) and the Ethics committee of all participating hospitals. Results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05407610. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10401223/ /pubmed/37532482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073949 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Vanneste, Thibaut
Belba, Amy
van Kuijk, Sander
Kimman, Merel
Bellemans, Johan
Bonhomme, Vincent
Sommer, Micha
Emans, Pieter
Vankrunkelsven, Patrik
Tartaglia, Katrien
Van Zundert, Jan
Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS)
title Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS)
title_full Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS)
title_fullStr Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS)
title_short Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS)
title_sort comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (cogenius)
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37532482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073949
work_keys_str_mv AT vannestethibaut comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius
AT belbaamy comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius
AT vankuijksander comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius
AT kimmanmerel comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius
AT bellemansjohan comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius
AT bonhommevincent comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius
AT sommermicha comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius
AT emanspieter comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius
AT vankrunkelsvenpatrik comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius
AT tartagliakatrien comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius
AT vanzundertjan comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius