Cargando…
Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS)
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic knee pain is increasing. Osteoarthritis (OA) and persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) are two important causes of knee pain. Chronic knee pain is primarily treated with medications, physiotherapy, life-style changes and intra-articular infiltrations. A radiofre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37532482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073949 |
_version_ | 1785084610745466880 |
---|---|
author | Vanneste, Thibaut Belba, Amy van Kuijk, Sander Kimman, Merel Bellemans, Johan Bonhomme, Vincent Sommer, Micha Emans, Pieter Vankrunkelsven, Patrik Tartaglia, Katrien Van Zundert, Jan |
author_facet | Vanneste, Thibaut Belba, Amy van Kuijk, Sander Kimman, Merel Bellemans, Johan Bonhomme, Vincent Sommer, Micha Emans, Pieter Vankrunkelsven, Patrik Tartaglia, Katrien Van Zundert, Jan |
author_sort | Vanneste, Thibaut |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic knee pain is increasing. Osteoarthritis (OA) and persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) are two important causes of knee pain. Chronic knee pain is primarily treated with medications, physiotherapy, life-style changes and intra-articular infiltrations. A radiofrequency treatment (RF) of the genicular nerves is a therapeutical option for refractory knee pain. This study investigates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conventional and cooled RF in patients suffering from chronic, therapy resistant, moderate to severe knee pain due to OA and PPSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The COGENIUS trial is a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Patients and outcome assessors are blinded. Patients will be recruited and treated in Belgium and the Netherlands. All PPSP after a total knee prothesis and OA patients (grades 2–4) will undergo a run-in period of 1–3 months where conservative treatment will be optimised. After the run-in period, 200 patient per group will be randomised to conventional RF, cooled RF or a sham procedure following a 2:2:1 ratio. The analysis will include a comparison of the effectiveness of each RF treatment with the sham procedure and secondarily between conventional and cooled RF. All comparisons will be made for each indication separately. The primary outcome is the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at 6 months. Other outcomes include knee pain, physical functionality, health-related quality of life, emotional health, medication use, healthcare and societal cost and adverse events up to 24 months postintervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Antwerp (Number Project ID 3069-Edge 002190-BUN B3002022000025), the Ethics committee of Maastricht University (Number NL80503.068.22-METC22-023) and the Ethics committee of all participating hospitals. Results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05407610. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10401223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104012232023-08-05 Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS) Vanneste, Thibaut Belba, Amy van Kuijk, Sander Kimman, Merel Bellemans, Johan Bonhomme, Vincent Sommer, Micha Emans, Pieter Vankrunkelsven, Patrik Tartaglia, Katrien Van Zundert, Jan BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic knee pain is increasing. Osteoarthritis (OA) and persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) are two important causes of knee pain. Chronic knee pain is primarily treated with medications, physiotherapy, life-style changes and intra-articular infiltrations. A radiofrequency treatment (RF) of the genicular nerves is a therapeutical option for refractory knee pain. This study investigates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conventional and cooled RF in patients suffering from chronic, therapy resistant, moderate to severe knee pain due to OA and PPSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The COGENIUS trial is a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Patients and outcome assessors are blinded. Patients will be recruited and treated in Belgium and the Netherlands. All PPSP after a total knee prothesis and OA patients (grades 2–4) will undergo a run-in period of 1–3 months where conservative treatment will be optimised. After the run-in period, 200 patient per group will be randomised to conventional RF, cooled RF or a sham procedure following a 2:2:1 ratio. The analysis will include a comparison of the effectiveness of each RF treatment with the sham procedure and secondarily between conventional and cooled RF. All comparisons will be made for each indication separately. The primary outcome is the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at 6 months. Other outcomes include knee pain, physical functionality, health-related quality of life, emotional health, medication use, healthcare and societal cost and adverse events up to 24 months postintervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Antwerp (Number Project ID 3069-Edge 002190-BUN B3002022000025), the Ethics committee of Maastricht University (Number NL80503.068.22-METC22-023) and the Ethics committee of all participating hospitals. Results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05407610. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10401223/ /pubmed/37532482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073949 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Anaesthesia Vanneste, Thibaut Belba, Amy van Kuijk, Sander Kimman, Merel Bellemans, Johan Bonhomme, Vincent Sommer, Micha Emans, Pieter Vankrunkelsven, Patrik Tartaglia, Katrien Van Zundert, Jan Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS) |
title | Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS) |
title_full | Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS) |
title_short | Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS) |
title_sort | comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (cogenius) |
topic | Anaesthesia |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37532482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073949 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vannestethibaut comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius AT belbaamy comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius AT vankuijksander comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius AT kimmanmerel comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius AT bellemansjohan comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius AT bonhommevincent comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius AT sommermicha comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius AT emanspieter comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius AT vankrunkelsvenpatrik comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius AT tartagliakatrien comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius AT vanzundertjan comparisonofconventionalandcooledradiofrequencytreatmentofthegenicularnervesversusshamprocedureforpatientswithchronickneepainprotocolforamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrialcogenius |