Cargando…

Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, elderly patients represent a significant number of accesses to the Emergency Department (ED). Working rhythms do not allow to perform complete cognitive analysis, which would, however, be useful for the health care. This study aims to define the optimal cut-off values of the si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salis, Francesco, Pili, Daniela, Collu, Manuel, Serchisu, Luca, Laconi, Rosanna, Mandas, Antonella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1186502
_version_ 1785084620434309120
author Salis, Francesco
Pili, Daniela
Collu, Manuel
Serchisu, Luca
Laconi, Rosanna
Mandas, Antonella
author_facet Salis, Francesco
Pili, Daniela
Collu, Manuel
Serchisu, Luca
Laconi, Rosanna
Mandas, Antonella
author_sort Salis, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nowadays, elderly patients represent a significant number of accesses to the Emergency Department (ED). Working rhythms do not allow to perform complete cognitive analysis, which would, however, be useful for the health care. This study aims to define the optimal cut-off values of the six-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) as a cognitive screening tool in ED. METHODS: This study included 215 subjects, evaluated at the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy, from July to December 2021. The accuracy of 6-CIT as a cognitive screening tool was assessed by comparison with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between the two tests was −0.836 (CI: −0.87 to −0.79; p < 0.0001), and 6-CIT showed AUC = 0.947 (CI: 0.908–0.973; p < 0.0001). The 8/9 6-CIT cut-off score presented 86.76% sensitivity (CI: 76.4–93.8) and 91.84% specificity (CI: 86.2–95.7), and Youden index for this score was 0.786. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that 6-CIT is a reliable cognitive screening tool in ED, offering excellent sensitivity and specificity with a 8/9 points cut-off score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10401263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104012632023-08-05 Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting Salis, Francesco Pili, Daniela Collu, Manuel Serchisu, Luca Laconi, Rosanna Mandas, Antonella Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Nowadays, elderly patients represent a significant number of accesses to the Emergency Department (ED). Working rhythms do not allow to perform complete cognitive analysis, which would, however, be useful for the health care. This study aims to define the optimal cut-off values of the six-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) as a cognitive screening tool in ED. METHODS: This study included 215 subjects, evaluated at the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy, from July to December 2021. The accuracy of 6-CIT as a cognitive screening tool was assessed by comparison with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between the two tests was −0.836 (CI: −0.87 to −0.79; p < 0.0001), and 6-CIT showed AUC = 0.947 (CI: 0.908–0.973; p < 0.0001). The 8/9 6-CIT cut-off score presented 86.76% sensitivity (CI: 76.4–93.8) and 91.84% specificity (CI: 86.2–95.7), and Youden index for this score was 0.786. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that 6-CIT is a reliable cognitive screening tool in ED, offering excellent sensitivity and specificity with a 8/9 points cut-off score. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10401263/ /pubmed/37547596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1186502 Text en Copyright © 2023 Salis, Pili, Collu, Serchisu, Laconi and Mandas. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Salis, Francesco
Pili, Daniela
Collu, Manuel
Serchisu, Luca
Laconi, Rosanna
Mandas, Antonella
Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting
title Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting
title_full Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting
title_fullStr Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting
title_full_unstemmed Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting
title_short Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting
title_sort six-item cognitive impairment test (6-cit)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1186502
work_keys_str_mv AT salisfrancesco sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting
AT pilidaniela sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting
AT collumanuel sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting
AT serchisuluca sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting
AT laconirosanna sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting
AT mandasantonella sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting