Cargando…
Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting
BACKGROUND: Nowadays, elderly patients represent a significant number of accesses to the Emergency Department (ED). Working rhythms do not allow to perform complete cognitive analysis, which would, however, be useful for the health care. This study aims to define the optimal cut-off values of the si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1186502 |
_version_ | 1785084620434309120 |
---|---|
author | Salis, Francesco Pili, Daniela Collu, Manuel Serchisu, Luca Laconi, Rosanna Mandas, Antonella |
author_facet | Salis, Francesco Pili, Daniela Collu, Manuel Serchisu, Luca Laconi, Rosanna Mandas, Antonella |
author_sort | Salis, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nowadays, elderly patients represent a significant number of accesses to the Emergency Department (ED). Working rhythms do not allow to perform complete cognitive analysis, which would, however, be useful for the health care. This study aims to define the optimal cut-off values of the six-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) as a cognitive screening tool in ED. METHODS: This study included 215 subjects, evaluated at the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy, from July to December 2021. The accuracy of 6-CIT as a cognitive screening tool was assessed by comparison with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between the two tests was −0.836 (CI: −0.87 to −0.79; p < 0.0001), and 6-CIT showed AUC = 0.947 (CI: 0.908–0.973; p < 0.0001). The 8/9 6-CIT cut-off score presented 86.76% sensitivity (CI: 76.4–93.8) and 91.84% specificity (CI: 86.2–95.7), and Youden index for this score was 0.786. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that 6-CIT is a reliable cognitive screening tool in ED, offering excellent sensitivity and specificity with a 8/9 points cut-off score. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10401263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104012632023-08-05 Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting Salis, Francesco Pili, Daniela Collu, Manuel Serchisu, Luca Laconi, Rosanna Mandas, Antonella Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Nowadays, elderly patients represent a significant number of accesses to the Emergency Department (ED). Working rhythms do not allow to perform complete cognitive analysis, which would, however, be useful for the health care. This study aims to define the optimal cut-off values of the six-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) as a cognitive screening tool in ED. METHODS: This study included 215 subjects, evaluated at the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy, from July to December 2021. The accuracy of 6-CIT as a cognitive screening tool was assessed by comparison with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between the two tests was −0.836 (CI: −0.87 to −0.79; p < 0.0001), and 6-CIT showed AUC = 0.947 (CI: 0.908–0.973; p < 0.0001). The 8/9 6-CIT cut-off score presented 86.76% sensitivity (CI: 76.4–93.8) and 91.84% specificity (CI: 86.2–95.7), and Youden index for this score was 0.786. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that 6-CIT is a reliable cognitive screening tool in ED, offering excellent sensitivity and specificity with a 8/9 points cut-off score. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10401263/ /pubmed/37547596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1186502 Text en Copyright © 2023 Salis, Pili, Collu, Serchisu, Laconi and Mandas. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Salis, Francesco Pili, Daniela Collu, Manuel Serchisu, Luca Laconi, Rosanna Mandas, Antonella Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting |
title | Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting |
title_full | Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting |
title_fullStr | Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting |
title_short | Six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting |
title_sort | six-item cognitive impairment test (6-cit)’s accuracy as a cognitive screening tool: best cut-off levels in emergency department setting |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1186502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salisfrancesco sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting AT pilidaniela sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting AT collumanuel sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting AT serchisuluca sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting AT laconirosanna sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting AT mandasantonella sixitemcognitiveimpairmenttest6citsaccuracyasacognitivescreeningtoolbestcutofflevelsinemergencydepartmentsetting |