Cargando…

Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine

BACKGROUND: Fexofenadine emerged as one of the most representative second generation histamine H1 antagonist drugs since the 1990s, with an outstanding efficacy and appreciable safety for the treatment of allergic patients. While allergic rhino-conjunctivitis represents the most frequent atopic dise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gómez, René Maximiliano, Moreno, Pablo, Compalati, Enrico, Canonica, Giorgio Walter, Ansotegui Zubeldia, Ignacio Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Allergy Organization 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100795
_version_ 1785084638808506368
author Gómez, René Maximiliano
Moreno, Pablo
Compalati, Enrico
Canonica, Giorgio Walter
Ansotegui Zubeldia, Ignacio Javier
author_facet Gómez, René Maximiliano
Moreno, Pablo
Compalati, Enrico
Canonica, Giorgio Walter
Ansotegui Zubeldia, Ignacio Javier
author_sort Gómez, René Maximiliano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fexofenadine emerged as one of the most representative second generation histamine H1 antagonist drugs since the 1990s, with an outstanding efficacy and appreciable safety for the treatment of allergic patients. While allergic rhino-conjunctivitis represents the most frequent atopic disease globally, an update of fexofenadine efficacy and safety on this entity was proposed as a surrogate of allergic condition. METHODS: Double blind, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine for the treatment of Allergic Rhinitis were searched in 5 major global databases. Eligibility criteria and characteristics, risk of bias, and validity assessment, data extraction and heterogeneity evaluation are described. Primary outcome selected corresponded to 12-reflective and instantaneous total symptom scores (TSS), besides morning instantaneous TSS and the frequency of reported adverse events (AEs); analysis was planned on the intention-to-treat population. Standardized mean differences of scoring systems were analyzed, and Cochran's Q statistic test and the I(2) test were assessed for heterogeneity. RESULTS: From the initial 83 identified records, 12 eligible studies were selected. In the evaluated patients, individuals receiving fexofenadine (1910) showed a significant reduction of TSS compared with those who received placebo (1777), change from baseline: standardized mean difference (SMD) –0.33; 95% CI–0.47 to −0.18, p < 0.0001. Morning instantaneous TSS also demonstrated lower symptoms (change from baseline: SMS -1.42; 95% CI -2.22 to −0.62, p = 0.0005). Heterogeneity was found across selected studies. Frequency of AEs was similar compared to placebo (OR = 1.04; 0.88–1.21), with no detection of heterogeneity across these 12 studies. CONCLUSIONS: According to this new evidence, fexofenadine maintains its beneficial profile on signs and symptoms of patients with allergic conditions, as well as its attributes as one of the major candidates for an ideal antihistamine medication (including special conditions such as pregnancy and pre-school age), providing support to its over-the-counter condition in several countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10401337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher World Allergy Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104013372023-08-05 Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine Gómez, René Maximiliano Moreno, Pablo Compalati, Enrico Canonica, Giorgio Walter Ansotegui Zubeldia, Ignacio Javier World Allergy Organ J Full Length Article BACKGROUND: Fexofenadine emerged as one of the most representative second generation histamine H1 antagonist drugs since the 1990s, with an outstanding efficacy and appreciable safety for the treatment of allergic patients. While allergic rhino-conjunctivitis represents the most frequent atopic disease globally, an update of fexofenadine efficacy and safety on this entity was proposed as a surrogate of allergic condition. METHODS: Double blind, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine for the treatment of Allergic Rhinitis were searched in 5 major global databases. Eligibility criteria and characteristics, risk of bias, and validity assessment, data extraction and heterogeneity evaluation are described. Primary outcome selected corresponded to 12-reflective and instantaneous total symptom scores (TSS), besides morning instantaneous TSS and the frequency of reported adverse events (AEs); analysis was planned on the intention-to-treat population. Standardized mean differences of scoring systems were analyzed, and Cochran's Q statistic test and the I(2) test were assessed for heterogeneity. RESULTS: From the initial 83 identified records, 12 eligible studies were selected. In the evaluated patients, individuals receiving fexofenadine (1910) showed a significant reduction of TSS compared with those who received placebo (1777), change from baseline: standardized mean difference (SMD) –0.33; 95% CI–0.47 to −0.18, p < 0.0001. Morning instantaneous TSS also demonstrated lower symptoms (change from baseline: SMS -1.42; 95% CI -2.22 to −0.62, p = 0.0005). Heterogeneity was found across selected studies. Frequency of AEs was similar compared to placebo (OR = 1.04; 0.88–1.21), with no detection of heterogeneity across these 12 studies. CONCLUSIONS: According to this new evidence, fexofenadine maintains its beneficial profile on signs and symptoms of patients with allergic conditions, as well as its attributes as one of the major candidates for an ideal antihistamine medication (including special conditions such as pregnancy and pre-school age), providing support to its over-the-counter condition in several countries. World Allergy Organization 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10401337/ /pubmed/37546236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100795 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Gómez, René Maximiliano
Moreno, Pablo
Compalati, Enrico
Canonica, Giorgio Walter
Ansotegui Zubeldia, Ignacio Javier
Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine
title Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine
title_full Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine
title_fullStr Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine
title_full_unstemmed Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine
title_short Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine
title_sort update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100795
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezrenemaximiliano updatemetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyissuesoffexofenadine
AT morenopablo updatemetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyissuesoffexofenadine
AT compalatienrico updatemetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyissuesoffexofenadine
AT canonicagiorgiowalter updatemetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyissuesoffexofenadine
AT ansoteguizubeldiaignaciojavier updatemetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyissuesoffexofenadine