Cargando…
Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine
BACKGROUND: Fexofenadine emerged as one of the most representative second generation histamine H1 antagonist drugs since the 1990s, with an outstanding efficacy and appreciable safety for the treatment of allergic patients. While allergic rhino-conjunctivitis represents the most frequent atopic dise...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
World Allergy Organization
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100795 |
_version_ | 1785084638808506368 |
---|---|
author | Gómez, René Maximiliano Moreno, Pablo Compalati, Enrico Canonica, Giorgio Walter Ansotegui Zubeldia, Ignacio Javier |
author_facet | Gómez, René Maximiliano Moreno, Pablo Compalati, Enrico Canonica, Giorgio Walter Ansotegui Zubeldia, Ignacio Javier |
author_sort | Gómez, René Maximiliano |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fexofenadine emerged as one of the most representative second generation histamine H1 antagonist drugs since the 1990s, with an outstanding efficacy and appreciable safety for the treatment of allergic patients. While allergic rhino-conjunctivitis represents the most frequent atopic disease globally, an update of fexofenadine efficacy and safety on this entity was proposed as a surrogate of allergic condition. METHODS: Double blind, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine for the treatment of Allergic Rhinitis were searched in 5 major global databases. Eligibility criteria and characteristics, risk of bias, and validity assessment, data extraction and heterogeneity evaluation are described. Primary outcome selected corresponded to 12-reflective and instantaneous total symptom scores (TSS), besides morning instantaneous TSS and the frequency of reported adverse events (AEs); analysis was planned on the intention-to-treat population. Standardized mean differences of scoring systems were analyzed, and Cochran's Q statistic test and the I(2) test were assessed for heterogeneity. RESULTS: From the initial 83 identified records, 12 eligible studies were selected. In the evaluated patients, individuals receiving fexofenadine (1910) showed a significant reduction of TSS compared with those who received placebo (1777), change from baseline: standardized mean difference (SMD) –0.33; 95% CI–0.47 to −0.18, p < 0.0001. Morning instantaneous TSS also demonstrated lower symptoms (change from baseline: SMS -1.42; 95% CI -2.22 to −0.62, p = 0.0005). Heterogeneity was found across selected studies. Frequency of AEs was similar compared to placebo (OR = 1.04; 0.88–1.21), with no detection of heterogeneity across these 12 studies. CONCLUSIONS: According to this new evidence, fexofenadine maintains its beneficial profile on signs and symptoms of patients with allergic conditions, as well as its attributes as one of the major candidates for an ideal antihistamine medication (including special conditions such as pregnancy and pre-school age), providing support to its over-the-counter condition in several countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10401337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | World Allergy Organization |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104013372023-08-05 Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine Gómez, René Maximiliano Moreno, Pablo Compalati, Enrico Canonica, Giorgio Walter Ansotegui Zubeldia, Ignacio Javier World Allergy Organ J Full Length Article BACKGROUND: Fexofenadine emerged as one of the most representative second generation histamine H1 antagonist drugs since the 1990s, with an outstanding efficacy and appreciable safety for the treatment of allergic patients. While allergic rhino-conjunctivitis represents the most frequent atopic disease globally, an update of fexofenadine efficacy and safety on this entity was proposed as a surrogate of allergic condition. METHODS: Double blind, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine for the treatment of Allergic Rhinitis were searched in 5 major global databases. Eligibility criteria and characteristics, risk of bias, and validity assessment, data extraction and heterogeneity evaluation are described. Primary outcome selected corresponded to 12-reflective and instantaneous total symptom scores (TSS), besides morning instantaneous TSS and the frequency of reported adverse events (AEs); analysis was planned on the intention-to-treat population. Standardized mean differences of scoring systems were analyzed, and Cochran's Q statistic test and the I(2) test were assessed for heterogeneity. RESULTS: From the initial 83 identified records, 12 eligible studies were selected. In the evaluated patients, individuals receiving fexofenadine (1910) showed a significant reduction of TSS compared with those who received placebo (1777), change from baseline: standardized mean difference (SMD) –0.33; 95% CI–0.47 to −0.18, p < 0.0001. Morning instantaneous TSS also demonstrated lower symptoms (change from baseline: SMS -1.42; 95% CI -2.22 to −0.62, p = 0.0005). Heterogeneity was found across selected studies. Frequency of AEs was similar compared to placebo (OR = 1.04; 0.88–1.21), with no detection of heterogeneity across these 12 studies. CONCLUSIONS: According to this new evidence, fexofenadine maintains its beneficial profile on signs and symptoms of patients with allergic conditions, as well as its attributes as one of the major candidates for an ideal antihistamine medication (including special conditions such as pregnancy and pre-school age), providing support to its over-the-counter condition in several countries. World Allergy Organization 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10401337/ /pubmed/37546236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100795 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Full Length Article Gómez, René Maximiliano Moreno, Pablo Compalati, Enrico Canonica, Giorgio Walter Ansotegui Zubeldia, Ignacio Javier Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine |
title | Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine |
title_full | Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine |
title_fullStr | Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine |
title_full_unstemmed | Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine |
title_short | Update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine |
title_sort | update meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety issues of fexofenadine |
topic | Full Length Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100795 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomezrenemaximiliano updatemetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyissuesoffexofenadine AT morenopablo updatemetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyissuesoffexofenadine AT compalatienrico updatemetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyissuesoffexofenadine AT canonicagiorgiowalter updatemetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyissuesoffexofenadine AT ansoteguizubeldiaignaciojavier updatemetaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyissuesoffexofenadine |