Cargando…
Utilization of overground exoskeleton gait training during inpatient rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis
BACKGROUND: Overground exoskeleton gait training (OEGT) after neurological injury is safe, feasible, and may yield positive outcomes. However, no recommendations exist for initiation, progression, or termination of OEGT. This retrospective study highlights the clinical use and decision-making of OEG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37542322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01220-w |
_version_ | 1785084742811516928 |
---|---|
author | Gillespie, Jaime Arnold, Dannae Trammell, Molly Bennett, Monica Ochoa, Christa Driver, Simon Callender, Librada Sikka, Seema Dubiel, Rosemary Swank, Chad |
author_facet | Gillespie, Jaime Arnold, Dannae Trammell, Molly Bennett, Monica Ochoa, Christa Driver, Simon Callender, Librada Sikka, Seema Dubiel, Rosemary Swank, Chad |
author_sort | Gillespie, Jaime |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Overground exoskeleton gait training (OEGT) after neurological injury is safe, feasible, and may yield positive outcomes. However, no recommendations exist for initiation, progression, or termination of OEGT. This retrospective study highlights the clinical use and decision-making of OEGT within the physical therapy plan of care for patients after neurological injury during inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: The records of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation after stroke, spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury who participated in at least one OEGT session were retrospectively reviewed. Session details were analyzed to illustrate progress and included: “up” time, “walk” time, step count, device assistance required for limb swing, and therapist-determined settings. Surveys were completed by therapists responsible for OEGT sessions to illuminate clinical decision-making. RESULTS: On average, patients demonstrated progressive tolerance for OEGT over successive sessions as shown by increasing time upright and walking, step count, and decreased assistance required by the exoskeleton. Therapists place preference on using OEGT with patients with more functional dependency and assess feedback from the patient and device to determine when to change settings. OEGT is terminated when other gait methods yield higher step repetitions or intensities, or to prepare for discharge. CONCLUSION: Our descriptive retrospective data suggests that patients after neurological injury may benefit from OEGT during inpatient rehabilitation. As no guidelines exist, therapists’ clinical decisions are currently based on a combination of knowledge of motor recovery and experience. Future efforts should aim to develop evidence-based recommendations to facilitate functional recovery after neurological injury by leveraging OEGT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01220-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10401799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104017992023-08-05 Utilization of overground exoskeleton gait training during inpatient rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis Gillespie, Jaime Arnold, Dannae Trammell, Molly Bennett, Monica Ochoa, Christa Driver, Simon Callender, Librada Sikka, Seema Dubiel, Rosemary Swank, Chad J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Overground exoskeleton gait training (OEGT) after neurological injury is safe, feasible, and may yield positive outcomes. However, no recommendations exist for initiation, progression, or termination of OEGT. This retrospective study highlights the clinical use and decision-making of OEGT within the physical therapy plan of care for patients after neurological injury during inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: The records of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation after stroke, spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury who participated in at least one OEGT session were retrospectively reviewed. Session details were analyzed to illustrate progress and included: “up” time, “walk” time, step count, device assistance required for limb swing, and therapist-determined settings. Surveys were completed by therapists responsible for OEGT sessions to illuminate clinical decision-making. RESULTS: On average, patients demonstrated progressive tolerance for OEGT over successive sessions as shown by increasing time upright and walking, step count, and decreased assistance required by the exoskeleton. Therapists place preference on using OEGT with patients with more functional dependency and assess feedback from the patient and device to determine when to change settings. OEGT is terminated when other gait methods yield higher step repetitions or intensities, or to prepare for discharge. CONCLUSION: Our descriptive retrospective data suggests that patients after neurological injury may benefit from OEGT during inpatient rehabilitation. As no guidelines exist, therapists’ clinical decisions are currently based on a combination of knowledge of motor recovery and experience. Future efforts should aim to develop evidence-based recommendations to facilitate functional recovery after neurological injury by leveraging OEGT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01220-w. BioMed Central 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10401799/ /pubmed/37542322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01220-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Gillespie, Jaime Arnold, Dannae Trammell, Molly Bennett, Monica Ochoa, Christa Driver, Simon Callender, Librada Sikka, Seema Dubiel, Rosemary Swank, Chad Utilization of overground exoskeleton gait training during inpatient rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis |
title | Utilization of overground exoskeleton gait training during inpatient rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis |
title_full | Utilization of overground exoskeleton gait training during inpatient rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis |
title_fullStr | Utilization of overground exoskeleton gait training during inpatient rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Utilization of overground exoskeleton gait training during inpatient rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis |
title_short | Utilization of overground exoskeleton gait training during inpatient rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis |
title_sort | utilization of overground exoskeleton gait training during inpatient rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37542322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01220-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillespiejaime utilizationofovergroundexoskeletongaittrainingduringinpatientrehabilitationadescriptiveanalysis AT arnolddannae utilizationofovergroundexoskeletongaittrainingduringinpatientrehabilitationadescriptiveanalysis AT trammellmolly utilizationofovergroundexoskeletongaittrainingduringinpatientrehabilitationadescriptiveanalysis AT bennettmonica utilizationofovergroundexoskeletongaittrainingduringinpatientrehabilitationadescriptiveanalysis AT ochoachrista utilizationofovergroundexoskeletongaittrainingduringinpatientrehabilitationadescriptiveanalysis AT driversimon utilizationofovergroundexoskeletongaittrainingduringinpatientrehabilitationadescriptiveanalysis AT callenderlibrada utilizationofovergroundexoskeletongaittrainingduringinpatientrehabilitationadescriptiveanalysis AT sikkaseema utilizationofovergroundexoskeletongaittrainingduringinpatientrehabilitationadescriptiveanalysis AT dubielrosemary utilizationofovergroundexoskeletongaittrainingduringinpatientrehabilitationadescriptiveanalysis AT swankchad utilizationofovergroundexoskeletongaittrainingduringinpatientrehabilitationadescriptiveanalysis |