Cargando…

Use of complementary and integrative health in Finland: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Population based studies have shown large differences in the estimated prevalence of complementary and integrative health (CIH) usage between studies. This is in part due to there being no golden standard definition for CIH. In Finland, an updated and internationally comparable study on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pyykkönen, Maija, Aarva, Pauliina, Ahola, Salla, Pasanen, Matti, Helin, Kaija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37542306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04088-4
_version_ 1785084744060370944
author Pyykkönen, Maija
Aarva, Pauliina
Ahola, Salla
Pasanen, Matti
Helin, Kaija
author_facet Pyykkönen, Maija
Aarva, Pauliina
Ahola, Salla
Pasanen, Matti
Helin, Kaija
author_sort Pyykkönen, Maija
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Population based studies have shown large differences in the estimated prevalence of complementary and integrative health (CIH) usage between studies. This is in part due to there being no golden standard definition for CIH. In Finland, an updated and internationally comparable study on the prevalence of CIH usage is needed. In the present study, a modified Finnish version of the International Questionnaire to Measure Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-QFI) was utilised to examine prevalence of use of different CIH modalities and their experienced helpfulness in the general Finnish population. METHODS: Respondents aged 16 and above were invited to take part in this descriptive cross-sectional study through an online panel in December 2022. The usage of CIH and the experienced helpfulness were calculated with SPSS (v28) as the proportion of users per each modality. The data were weighted based on gender, age and place of residence. RESULTS: A total of 3244 respondents completed the survey. CIH was used by 51.1% (95%CI: 49.4–52.8) of the respondents in the 12 months prior to the survey. Self-help practices were the most used category of CIH (28.8%; 95%CI: 27.3–30.4). The prevalence of usage of CIH natural remedies excluding vitamins and minerals was 27.0% (95%CI: 25.5–28.6). CIH providers were visited by 20.4% of the respondents (95%CI: 19.0–21.8). Getting help for a long-term illness or improvement of well-being were often mentioned as the most important reason for the use of different CIH modalities. CIH was generally used more by women compared to men. The large majority found the modalities they used helpful. CONCLUSIONS: The results increase current understanding on CIH usage in Finland. As the majority of users experience CIH as helpful, there is a need to study CIH in the context of public health policies. The estimates of CIH usage are highly dependent on what is considered as CIH, and this should be paid attention to in future studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-023-04088-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10401804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104018042023-08-05 Use of complementary and integrative health in Finland: a cross-sectional survey Pyykkönen, Maija Aarva, Pauliina Ahola, Salla Pasanen, Matti Helin, Kaija BMC Complement Med Ther Research BACKGROUND: Population based studies have shown large differences in the estimated prevalence of complementary and integrative health (CIH) usage between studies. This is in part due to there being no golden standard definition for CIH. In Finland, an updated and internationally comparable study on the prevalence of CIH usage is needed. In the present study, a modified Finnish version of the International Questionnaire to Measure Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-QFI) was utilised to examine prevalence of use of different CIH modalities and their experienced helpfulness in the general Finnish population. METHODS: Respondents aged 16 and above were invited to take part in this descriptive cross-sectional study through an online panel in December 2022. The usage of CIH and the experienced helpfulness were calculated with SPSS (v28) as the proportion of users per each modality. The data were weighted based on gender, age and place of residence. RESULTS: A total of 3244 respondents completed the survey. CIH was used by 51.1% (95%CI: 49.4–52.8) of the respondents in the 12 months prior to the survey. Self-help practices were the most used category of CIH (28.8%; 95%CI: 27.3–30.4). The prevalence of usage of CIH natural remedies excluding vitamins and minerals was 27.0% (95%CI: 25.5–28.6). CIH providers were visited by 20.4% of the respondents (95%CI: 19.0–21.8). Getting help for a long-term illness or improvement of well-being were often mentioned as the most important reason for the use of different CIH modalities. CIH was generally used more by women compared to men. The large majority found the modalities they used helpful. CONCLUSIONS: The results increase current understanding on CIH usage in Finland. As the majority of users experience CIH as helpful, there is a need to study CIH in the context of public health policies. The estimates of CIH usage are highly dependent on what is considered as CIH, and this should be paid attention to in future studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-023-04088-4. BioMed Central 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10401804/ /pubmed/37542306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04088-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pyykkönen, Maija
Aarva, Pauliina
Ahola, Salla
Pasanen, Matti
Helin, Kaija
Use of complementary and integrative health in Finland: a cross-sectional survey
title Use of complementary and integrative health in Finland: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Use of complementary and integrative health in Finland: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Use of complementary and integrative health in Finland: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Use of complementary and integrative health in Finland: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Use of complementary and integrative health in Finland: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort use of complementary and integrative health in finland: a cross-sectional survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37542306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04088-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pyykkonenmaija useofcomplementaryandintegrativehealthinfinlandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT aarvapauliina useofcomplementaryandintegrativehealthinfinlandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT aholasalla useofcomplementaryandintegrativehealthinfinlandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT pasanenmatti useofcomplementaryandintegrativehealthinfinlandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT helinkaija useofcomplementaryandintegrativehealthinfinlandacrosssectionalsurvey