Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients – a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Different types of grafts can be used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is little published data regarding skeletally immature patients. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the clinical outcomes and complications for different autograft types use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verhagen, S, Dietvorst, M, Delvaux, EJLG, van der Steen, MC, Janssen, RPA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06749-4
_version_ 1785084755678593024
author Verhagen, S
Dietvorst, M
Delvaux, EJLG
van der Steen, MC
Janssen, RPA
author_facet Verhagen, S
Dietvorst, M
Delvaux, EJLG
van der Steen, MC
Janssen, RPA
author_sort Verhagen, S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Different types of grafts can be used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is little published data regarding skeletally immature patients. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the clinical outcomes and complications for different autograft types used in all-epiphyseal, transphyseal and partial epiphyseal/hybrid ACLR in skeletally immature children and adolescents. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for literature regarding ACLR using hamstrings, quadriceps or bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts in skeletally immature patients. Studies were included if they examined at least one of the following outcomes: graft failure, return to sport(s), growth disturbance, arthrofibrosis or patient reported outcomes and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Case reports, conference abstracts and studies examining allografts and extra-articular or over-the-top ACL reconstruction techniques were excluded. Graft failure rates were pooled for each graft type using the quality effects model of MetaXL. A qualitative synthesis of secondary outcomes was performed. RESULTS: The database search identified 242 studies. In total 31 studies were included in this review, comprising of 1358 patients. Most patients (81%) were treated using hamstring autograft. The most common used surgical technique was transphyseal. The weighted, pooled failure rate for each graft type was 12% for hamstring tendon autografts, 8% for quadriceps tendon autografts and 6% for BPTB autografts. Confidence intervals were overlapping. The variability in time to graft failure was high. The qualitative analysis of the secondary outcomes showed similar results with good clinical outcomes and low complication rates across all graft types. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review it is not possible to determine a superior graft type for ACLR in skeletally immature. Of the included studies, the most common graft type used was the hamstring tendon. Overall, graft failure rates are low, and most studies show good clinical outcomes with high return to sports rates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06749-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10401849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104018492023-08-05 Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients – a systematic review Verhagen, S Dietvorst, M Delvaux, EJLG van der Steen, MC Janssen, RPA BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Different types of grafts can be used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is little published data regarding skeletally immature patients. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the clinical outcomes and complications for different autograft types used in all-epiphyseal, transphyseal and partial epiphyseal/hybrid ACLR in skeletally immature children and adolescents. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for literature regarding ACLR using hamstrings, quadriceps or bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts in skeletally immature patients. Studies were included if they examined at least one of the following outcomes: graft failure, return to sport(s), growth disturbance, arthrofibrosis or patient reported outcomes and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Case reports, conference abstracts and studies examining allografts and extra-articular or over-the-top ACL reconstruction techniques were excluded. Graft failure rates were pooled for each graft type using the quality effects model of MetaXL. A qualitative synthesis of secondary outcomes was performed. RESULTS: The database search identified 242 studies. In total 31 studies were included in this review, comprising of 1358 patients. Most patients (81%) were treated using hamstring autograft. The most common used surgical technique was transphyseal. The weighted, pooled failure rate for each graft type was 12% for hamstring tendon autografts, 8% for quadriceps tendon autografts and 6% for BPTB autografts. Confidence intervals were overlapping. The variability in time to graft failure was high. The qualitative analysis of the secondary outcomes showed similar results with good clinical outcomes and low complication rates across all graft types. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review it is not possible to determine a superior graft type for ACLR in skeletally immature. Of the included studies, the most common graft type used was the hamstring tendon. Overall, graft failure rates are low, and most studies show good clinical outcomes with high return to sports rates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06749-4. BioMed Central 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10401849/ /pubmed/37537529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06749-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Verhagen, S
Dietvorst, M
Delvaux, EJLG
van der Steen, MC
Janssen, RPA
Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients – a systematic review
title Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients – a systematic review
title_full Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients – a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients – a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients – a systematic review
title_short Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients – a systematic review
title_sort clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients – a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10401849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37537529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06749-4
work_keys_str_mv AT verhagens clinicaloutcomesofdifferentautograftsusedforallepiphysealpartialepiphysealortransphysealanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninskeletallyimmaturepatientsasystematicreview
AT dietvorstm clinicaloutcomesofdifferentautograftsusedforallepiphysealpartialepiphysealortransphysealanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninskeletallyimmaturepatientsasystematicreview
AT delvauxejlg clinicaloutcomesofdifferentautograftsusedforallepiphysealpartialepiphysealortransphysealanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninskeletallyimmaturepatientsasystematicreview
AT vandersteenmc clinicaloutcomesofdifferentautograftsusedforallepiphysealpartialepiphysealortransphysealanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninskeletallyimmaturepatientsasystematicreview
AT janssenrpa clinicaloutcomesofdifferentautograftsusedforallepiphysealpartialepiphysealortransphysealanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninskeletallyimmaturepatientsasystematicreview