Cargando…

DENOISING DIFFUSION MRI: CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ANALYSIS

Development of diffusion MRI (dMRI) denoising approaches has experienced considerable growth over the last years. As noise can inherently reduce accuracy and precision in measurements, its effects have been well characterised both in terms of uncertainty increase in dMRI-derived features and in term...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manzano-Patron, Jose-Pedro, Moeller, Steen, Andersson, Jesper L.R., Ugurbil, Kamil, Yacoub, Essa, Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.550348
_version_ 1785084793589858304
author Manzano-Patron, Jose-Pedro
Moeller, Steen
Andersson, Jesper L.R.
Ugurbil, Kamil
Yacoub, Essa
Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N.
author_facet Manzano-Patron, Jose-Pedro
Moeller, Steen
Andersson, Jesper L.R.
Ugurbil, Kamil
Yacoub, Essa
Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N.
author_sort Manzano-Patron, Jose-Pedro
collection PubMed
description Development of diffusion MRI (dMRI) denoising approaches has experienced considerable growth over the last years. As noise can inherently reduce accuracy and precision in measurements, its effects have been well characterised both in terms of uncertainty increase in dMRI-derived features and in terms of biases caused by the noise floor, the smallest measurable signal given the noise level. However, gaps in our knowledge still exist in objectively characterising dMRI denoising approaches in terms of both of these effects and assessing their efficacy. In this work, we reconsider what a denoising method should and should not do and we accordingly define criteria to characterise the performance. We propose a comprehensive set of evaluations, including i) benefits in improving signal quality and reducing noise variance, ii) gains in reducing biases and the noise floor and improving, iii) preservation of spatial resolution, iv) agreement of denoised data against a gold standard, v) gains in downstream parameter estimation (precision and accuracy), vi) efficacy in enabling noise-prone applications, such as ultra-high-resolution imaging. We further provide newly acquired complex datasets (magnitude and phase) with multiple repeats that sample different SNR regimes to highlight performance differences under different scenarios. Without loss of generality, we subsequently apply a number of exemplar patch-based denoising algorithms to these datasets, including Non-Local Means, Marchenko-Pastur PCA (MPPCA) in the magnitude and complex domain and NORDIC, and compare them with respect to the above criteria and against a gold standard complex average of multiple repeats. We demonstrate that all tested denoising approaches reduce noise-related variance, but not always biases from the elevated noise floor. They all induce a spatial resolution penalty, but its extent can vary depending on the method and the implementation. Some denoising approaches agree with the gold standard more than others and we demonstrate challenges in even defining such a standard. Overall, we show that dMRI denoising performed in the complex domain is advantageous to magnitude domain denoising with respect to all the above criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10402048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104020482023-08-05 DENOISING DIFFUSION MRI: CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ANALYSIS Manzano-Patron, Jose-Pedro Moeller, Steen Andersson, Jesper L.R. Ugurbil, Kamil Yacoub, Essa Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N. bioRxiv Article Development of diffusion MRI (dMRI) denoising approaches has experienced considerable growth over the last years. As noise can inherently reduce accuracy and precision in measurements, its effects have been well characterised both in terms of uncertainty increase in dMRI-derived features and in terms of biases caused by the noise floor, the smallest measurable signal given the noise level. However, gaps in our knowledge still exist in objectively characterising dMRI denoising approaches in terms of both of these effects and assessing their efficacy. In this work, we reconsider what a denoising method should and should not do and we accordingly define criteria to characterise the performance. We propose a comprehensive set of evaluations, including i) benefits in improving signal quality and reducing noise variance, ii) gains in reducing biases and the noise floor and improving, iii) preservation of spatial resolution, iv) agreement of denoised data against a gold standard, v) gains in downstream parameter estimation (precision and accuracy), vi) efficacy in enabling noise-prone applications, such as ultra-high-resolution imaging. We further provide newly acquired complex datasets (magnitude and phase) with multiple repeats that sample different SNR regimes to highlight performance differences under different scenarios. Without loss of generality, we subsequently apply a number of exemplar patch-based denoising algorithms to these datasets, including Non-Local Means, Marchenko-Pastur PCA (MPPCA) in the magnitude and complex domain and NORDIC, and compare them with respect to the above criteria and against a gold standard complex average of multiple repeats. We demonstrate that all tested denoising approaches reduce noise-related variance, but not always biases from the elevated noise floor. They all induce a spatial resolution penalty, but its extent can vary depending on the method and the implementation. Some denoising approaches agree with the gold standard more than others and we demonstrate challenges in even defining such a standard. Overall, we show that dMRI denoising performed in the complex domain is advantageous to magnitude domain denoising with respect to all the above criteria. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10402048/ /pubmed/37546835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.550348 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Manzano-Patron, Jose-Pedro
Moeller, Steen
Andersson, Jesper L.R.
Ugurbil, Kamil
Yacoub, Essa
Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N.
DENOISING DIFFUSION MRI: CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ANALYSIS
title DENOISING DIFFUSION MRI: CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ANALYSIS
title_full DENOISING DIFFUSION MRI: CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ANALYSIS
title_fullStr DENOISING DIFFUSION MRI: CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed DENOISING DIFFUSION MRI: CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ANALYSIS
title_short DENOISING DIFFUSION MRI: CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ANALYSIS
title_sort denoising diffusion mri: considerations and implications for analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.550348
work_keys_str_mv AT manzanopatronjosepedro denoisingdiffusionmriconsiderationsandimplicationsforanalysis
AT moellersteen denoisingdiffusionmriconsiderationsandimplicationsforanalysis
AT anderssonjesperlr denoisingdiffusionmriconsiderationsandimplicationsforanalysis
AT ugurbilkamil denoisingdiffusionmriconsiderationsandimplicationsforanalysis
AT yacoubessa denoisingdiffusionmriconsiderationsandimplicationsforanalysis
AT sotiropoulosstamatiosn denoisingdiffusionmriconsiderationsandimplicationsforanalysis